Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Largest, US Sexuality Survey In History Shows Gays Far More Likely To Engage In Criminal Activities
LifeSite ^ | June 13, 2005

Posted on 06/14/2005 8:21:44 AM PDT by NYer

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO., June 13, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A forty-eight page study to be published two weeks from now in the peer-reviewed journal, Psychological Reports, compares extensive and newly released Center for Disease Control (CDC) data, concluding that homosexuals are far more likely to engage in illegal and socially dangerous behaviour than heterosexuals. In fact, according to the study, homosexuals are over 12% more likely to have been booked for illegal activity than heterosexuals.

Dr. James Cameron of the Family Research Institute led and penned the report, which is based upon data gathered in 1996 by the CDC.

The National Household Survey of Drug Abuse (NHSDA) asked 12,381 respondents between the ages of 18 and 59, forty-six highly personal questions, spanning their age, race, and extensive details about their lifestyle and past history. In an interview with lifesitenews.com Dr. Cameron called the survey “the largest, most elegant sexuality survey in the history of the United states”. He estimated the cost of conducting the study at $13 million.

The most remarkable thing about the NHSDA with its huge price-tag and its resultant controversial data, says Dr. Cameron, is that it hasn’t become public until now. In fact, according to Cameron the CDC, by law, was supposed to release the results of the survey, but didn’t. When Cameron got wind of it and personally hunted down the data “The National Center for Health Statistics had been sitting on it for a year.”

Even now that this data has quietly become public “The CDC has essentially neglected it” remarked Cameron. In fact, only one minor paper on the whole survey has so far been published. “It’s a shame that the largest and best sexuality study in the history of the United States is just sort of gathering dust on the shelf.”

In a press release put out by his institute Cameron alleges that the study “was withheld from the general public because of its explosive content.”

By conducting and publishing his study entitled, “Homosexual Sex As Harmful as Drug Abuse, Prostitution Or Smoking”, Cameron set out to put the data to its intended use. “You’d have to have a gob of money [to conduct such a study],” said Cameron. “We couldn’t have done it, and what is most impressive is that this is the CDC. They won’t deny that they did the study, and they won’t deny the data. Here’s the CDC, staunchly homosexual,” collecting data which proves the dangerous nature of homosexuality.

In order to make the study as scientific, comprehensive and as hard-hitting as possible, the study also compares the results of the current survey with other similar surveys, all of which, with minor exceptions, correspond to the Family Research Institute report.

The CDC itself compiled the data so as to compare the activities of those who engaged in the so-called “four recreations” (homosexuality, prostitution, illegal drug use and smoking) and those who had not.  The Family Research Institute then compared this data accordingly, concluding that “Those who engaged in homosexuality were similar to those who used illegal drugs, participated in prostitution, or regularly smoked in disturbances of public health and social order. That is, similar patterns in the differences were evident in criminality, dangerousness, use of illegal substances, problems with substance use, mental health, and health costs.”

The data for criminality indicated that 22.8% of homosexuals have been booked for committing a crime, compared to 11% of heterosexuals. This statistic held true for both gays and lesbians. “That’s noteworthy,” said Cameron, “It shows a rebellion, an unwillingness to go along with society.”

The study also indicated an increase in the use of illegal substances, driving while intoxicated, and dangerous sexual practices, including intercourse with multiple and HIV+ partners. 

Speaking on the import of his research Cameron remarked that “The scripture of the realm of modernity is scientific literature. And we want the Christian community to understand that the science is really very consistent, and highly concordant with the historic Christian position on homosexuality.”

Dr. Cameron has long been a controversial character in the sociological/psychological world for his outspoken belief in the inherent dangers and immorality of homosexual behaviour. Some have asserted that his personal beliefs have influenced his research. Cameron, however, stands firmly behind his work and the scientific purity of his methods and conclusions.

Indeed, despite the taboo which certain pro-gay institutions, including the highly pro-gay American Psychological Association (APA), have attempted to attach to Cameron, the extent of his work into the subject has attracted a great deal of attention in the last number of years and his research has been widely cited.

In fact a Wall Street Journal article from April of this year reports that the journal in which Cameron publishes his work, Psychological Report, gives the necessary nod to the opinion of the APA and increases the number of peer reviewers from the usual four to as many as twenty-one before agreeing to publish his work. Following this extraordinary and unusual level of scientific rigour, Cameron’s studies continue to be printed in the journal as perfectly acceptable work in the realm of comparative sexual research.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cameron; cdc; criminals; drjamescameron; drpaulcameron; drugs; gay; homosexualagenda; jamescameron; nhsda; paulcameron; sociology; sodomites; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: NYer

Bump.


81 posted on 06/15/2005 12:31:33 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Democrats: The other white meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Highly interesting article. Although the writer gets it wrong in the first paragraph - homosexuals are twice as likely to be engaged in illegal activity. Read the thread, too.

So the CDC had this info for a year and sat on it. Anyone surprised?

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


82 posted on 06/15/2005 6:22:24 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Someone probably already told you, but it's an increase of 100%. Twice as likely. That IS significant.


83 posted on 06/15/2005 6:25:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Note to self - read the whole thread before making unnecessary comments!

Sorry!


84 posted on 06/15/2005 6:26:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma
It seems to me that if a man is willing to get excited by another mans rear, and act on it, then that doesn't leave many things to fall into the realm of something they wouldn't do. Why would someone think illegal activities would be excluded?

Yes!

85 posted on 06/15/2005 11:06:59 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Not to quibble

Stop quibbling.

86 posted on 06/15/2005 11:08:13 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I'll join in the quibbling. The survey is based on self-reporting, not a document background check.

So gays appear to be twice as likely to admit to having been booked, unless the study followed up and did a records check to see if the self-reports were true.


87 posted on 06/20/2005 6:40:31 PM PDT by DBrow (www.maps.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
I'll join in the quibbling. The survey is based on self-reporting, not a document background check.

Homosexuality is based upon self-reporting -are you suggesting any study involving the advancement of the homosexual agenda is necessarily flawed!

88 posted on 09/10/2005 7:14:42 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Two words - Svend Robinson


89 posted on 09/10/2005 7:20:46 PM PDT by Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Hmmm, well, yes. It would be easy to exaggerate, wouldn't it, if there were no objective test?

But homosexuality is not only detected by self-report. If someone, "X", told me that they had observed "Y" in homosexual behaviour, or had been approached for homosexual favors, that would be subjective, but third-party- not a self-report.

Then there's homosexual rape that goes to trial and a conviction is issued- pretty objective but not 100% certain.

And, while trying to avoid being too graphic, there are lots of Web pictures that show physical consequences of repeated homosexual relations.

Medical and court records and third-party testimonials can lend some objectivity. Relying on someone to report their own status is IMO unreliable.
90 posted on 09/11/2005 8:20:05 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson