[DBeers]

I'll join in the quibbling. The survey is based on self-reporting, not a document background check.

Homosexuality is based upon self-reporting -are you suggesting any study involving the advancement of the homosexual agenda is necessarily flawed!

[DBrow]

Hmmm, well, yes. It would be easy to exaggerate, wouldn't it, if there were no objective test?

But homosexuality is not only detected by self-report. If someone, "X", told me that they had observed "Y" in homosexual behaviour, or had been approached for homosexual favors, that would be subjective, but third-party- not a self-report.

Then there's homosexual rape that goes to trial and a conviction is issued- pretty objective but not 100% certain.

And, while trying to avoid being too graphic, there are lots of Web pictures that show physical consequences of repeated homosexual relations.

Medical and court records and third-party testimonials can lend some objectivity. Relying on someone to report their own status is IMO unreliable.