Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
Just breaking...
Point taken. I get a bit PO'd when people condemn a whole state, because of a few idiots and that state is usually California.
And if it's hard for Mommies to let their boys go to Neverland in the future, then those next victims are named Prince I and Prince II. When the 8 year old is 14 and tossed out of bed, the 3 year old will be 8 and ready to go. Sad.
I think she was saying that a mother...any mother would NOT do that...inotherwords...the mother knows it didn't happen or she would of gotten OUT and called the police instead of running to a lawyer.
Wait a minute--I just got home and am reading--
A JUROR, was condemning a mother for letting her child be with Jackson, but she voted to set him free?
In other words, the mother shouldn't have let him, so it makes her guilty, not Michael?
There you go---bogus, bogus verdict...who all got paid, or blackmailed, or threatened?
Since I can't seem to get away from MJ today, I may as well put in my 2 cents worth. I haven't followed this trial a wit, except for the couple seconds it takes for me to change channels, but we knew that this was going to be the inevitable result. The system is rigged in favor of black celebrities (especially if they're rich). The prosecution has everything stacked against them, regardless of evidence.
I wonder how many parents are going to line up to sacrifice their children at the MJ altar for money... and you know there will be plenty.
They degrees on paper... They attend classes and pass tests. Doesn't mean they are intelligent at all.
WHO CARES WHAT SHE LOOKED LIKE
HOW ABOUT THE FACTS!!!! / rant >
that last alternate might have voted differently. :)
And they are all ignorant! They didn't even believe the other victims according to Fox News! They have no bad feelings for Michael Jackson!!! He sleeps with LITTLE BOYS! That's a fact they can't ignore!
Most folks that are selected for jury trials are not the cutting edge of "Brain Power"
As have most FReepers. Who in their right mind lets a kid face the kind of risk this mother did? Hell, I don't know if MJ is a molester or not, but I think he's too weird to trust with my dog.
EXACTLY!!
You made my point, MJ had those guys sleep over but they were rich and famous kids at the time, so of course he would not touch THEM!
He touches poor kids from %%%ked up familes.
He is a predator. He knows what to do.
The State didn't have a choice about the mother testifying. If the State didn't, the defense would. Snedden did what he could.
I blame the jurors.
The parents were dancing in front of the gate when mj returned. I expected to see them throwing the kids in the windows of the vans.
Well, the giggling of the other 11 might keep them up.
I, too, blame the jurors.
Sadly, from what I saw of the jurors in their post-verdict interview, they'll have no trouble sleeping tonight. They didn't strike me as very thoughtful people, to say the least. They'll have no trouble justifying what they've done.
I think I agree. At the very least she wasn't vetted very well. Couldn't they tell she was a drama queen? It's pretty hard to hide those inclinations.
What pedophiles learn at some point is that it's safer to leave no witnesses. Either Jackson's bodyguards will see to it that the pesky kid has an accident, or Jackson will make so much money on his overseas tour that he can afford to pay megamillions to his victims's families. Also, Europe pays less attention to child molestation. If he decides to move there, he'll feel right at home.
The jurors will get rich from this though, that makes it even more sickening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.