Posted on 06/13/2005 12:36:01 PM PDT by Dog
LOL it's dum'b'ed but you are right. No critical thinking skills to be found.
"...in other news, Michael Jackson injured his back while having sex with an 12-year old boy atop a limo in the parking lot of the Santa Maria court building today. Jackson fans who witnessed the incident blamed the boy. 'Michael wasn't doin' nuffin' wrong,' said fan La'ShaniQa Johnson. 'Da boy was squirmin' too much.' And in sports today..."
MICHAEL SAYS: I BEAT IT!!
I know, THAT was outragous. And the prosecutors still had a few jurors they were permitted to dismiss when the jury selection process was over.
Acquitted because he is young, "gifted," black, and rich.
There are several here who think they know more about the case than the jurors who sat through every shred of evidence. Their blind conviction will not allow them to believe that the right verdict may have been made.
I have to agree....this was not the best witness for the prosecution-a woman who had falsely accused K-Mart security of molesting her in the past and who kept changing her story. This still reeks, though.
Nope. He will be raking it in with all the guest appearances and book deals from this.
Yup, and next stop: Oprah, the Today Show, The View... ugh
I would be interested in what the jury has to say.
Right about now Whorealdo is doing a happy dance.
Yep...
"That DA better start looking for a new job today... My guess he'll be unemployed tomorrow."
Writing his book and choosing between Oprah and Montel ...
Shame on this jury is right! GOD help future children from this freak!
Good post, I agree. The man is weird, undeniably so. But I too am not sure if he's guilty. There was definitely reasonable doubt, and he had to be found not guilty and I'm glad that he was. If there's reasonable doubt, it MUST be not guilty. I've seen too many instances of people being found guilty based on reputation but without credible evidence, and they probably were guilty I guess, but it's always bothered me.
OMG!! NOW THAT'S FUNNY!!!
No smiles coming out of the courtroom.... Greta VS looked like she had a stuned beeber.
Wow, how many of you watched the entire trial?
How many of you were in the jury room during deliberations?
It looks to me like these people took their time, discussed, and then came back with a thoroughly considered verdict.
Was reasonable doubt what did it? What do you expect juries to do?
They can't all be morons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.