Posted on 06/13/2005 10:08:34 AM PDT by jmc813
That was the creepy thing about the 2000 presidential election. When things stalled out, they called out James Baker and Warren Christopher, both of whom are big time CFR/Trilateralists to referee the results.
I really think we came that close (holding my fingers an inch apart) to a Constitutional crisis in 2000. When the CFR cabal openly trots out guys of that caliber to make sure things work out the way they wanted.
There appears to be two "schools" among the CFR members. One group favors an EU/Socialist model of governance. That's the Clinton/Carter school of "Internationalism." The folks who have come to be known as "neo-cons" are globalists who favor a model based on the US/Democratic model, although centralized through a UN-style world government. Neither Reagan or Bush "43" were CFR members, but their administrations were full of appointees with CFR ties. All the other presidents going back to Wilson were members of either the CFR or the Trilateral Commission (since the 1970s), or both.
They want to get this UN-reform stuff in place before 2008, because if that election is close, there is a strong chance that those UN troops might be needed to restore order. All you'd need is a candidate who refused to concede and we'd have civil war. (Think Hillary...)
I have a wonderful idea. How about we cut off funding either way, whether the UN adopts the reforms or not?
Next thing ya know they will be advocation silencing critics
and call it 'Campaign Finance Reform'
Maybe they think they can control it; that a powerful U.N. would be a tool in American hands. I think that is far too risky, myself. I'd rather we make an effort to keep the U.N. as weak as possible.
Have you seen this yet?
Sort of the equivalent of electing a conservative to "make government more efficient and effective," or "save social security."
We get what we vote for and deserve, I suppose.
hey ray, hows it going?
did you see this? thought you'd be interested.
Now you will see why this is just wishful thinking on your part. The CFR is the political ruling class of both parties... and hence, of this nation.
Understood.
Not me. I'd rather abolish the first act so I guess I'm two for two.
A lot of the establishment people were trying to stop Reagan. And after he was elected he was almost killed within a couple months by that attempted assasination.
Good buddy. You?
Ya just had to piss me off, dintja? LOL
The bastards need drawn and quartered.
http://www.cfr.org/pub7914/press_release/trinational_call_for_a_north_american_economic_and_security_community_by_2010.php
http://www.cfr.org/pub8104/press_release/task_force_urges_measures_to_strengthen_north_american_competitiveness_expand_trade_ensure_border_security.php
It's all coming together.
Ping to this thread for coincidence value.
I'm mostly a lurker here, so forgive my ignorance, but why are people on FR critical of Ron Paul? He states that we should completely remove ourselves from the UN. How can a conservative argue with that?
There are basement dwellers here, as in most forums, who have an interest in keeping the sheeple sleeping comfortably, like a big dumb Gulliver on the beach, as their masters wind string after string around the sleeping giant.
What he said in 39.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.