Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joking Pilots in Commuter Jet Crash Wanted to 'have a Little Fun' by Climbing to 41,000 Feet
AP ^ | AP-ES-06-13-05 1117EDT

Posted on 06/13/2005 8:45:15 AM PDT by TheOtherOne

Joking Pilots in Commuter Jet Crash Wanted to 'have a Little Fun' by Climbing to 41,000 Feet

By Leslie Miller Associated Press Writer
Published: Jun 13, 2005 WASHINGTON (AP) - Two pilots, in a jovial mood as they flew an empty commuter jet, wanted to "have a little fun" by taking the plane to an unusually high altitude last October, only to realize as the engines failed that they were not going to make it, according to transcripts released Monday.

The plane, which the two were ferrying from Little Rock, Ark. to Minneapolis, crashed and both Capt. Jesse Rhodes and First Officer Peter Cesarz perished.

The cockpit voice recording, released by the National Transportation Safety Board at the start of a three-day hearing into the Oct. 14, 2004 accident, revealed how the pilots cracked jokes and decided to "have a little fun" and fly to 41,000 feet - the maximum altitude for their 50-seat plane. Most commuter jets fly at lower altitudes.

"Man, we can do it, 41-it," said Cesarz at 9:48 p.m. A minute later, Rhodes said, "40 thousand, baby."

Two minutes later, "There's 41-0, my man," Cesarz said. "Made it, man."

At 9:52 p.m., one of the pilots popped a can of Pepsi and they joked about drinking beer. A minute later, Cesarz said, "This is the greatest thing, no way."

But at 10:03 p.m., the pilots reported their engine had failed. Five minutes later, they said both engines had failed and they wanted a direct route to any airport.

The transcript recounts their increasingly desperate efforts to restart the engines and regain altitude. They tried to land at the Jefferson City, Mo., airport but by 10:14 p.m., it was obvious they wouldn't reach it.

"We're not going to make it, man. We're not going to make it," Cesarz said. The plane crashed in a residential neighborhood of Jefferson City. No one was injured on the ground.

Accident investigators are examining how well the pilots were trained - a key safety question as the number of regional jets keeps growing.

The crash involved a Bombardier regional jet plane operated by Pinnacle Airlines, an affiliate of Northwest Airlines. Like many regional carriers, Pinnacle is growing rapidly as it teams up with a traditional network airline looking to offer more seats to more places.

Memphis, Tenn.-based Pinnacle grew by 700 percent in the past five years, according to Phil Reed, its marketing vice president. During that time, it switched its fleet from propeller-driven planes to small turbojets, known as regional jets, or RJs.

The number of regional jets rose to 1,630 last year from 570 in 2000, the Federal Aviation Administration says. The question of whether government safety inspectors can keep up with such rapid changes in the airline industry was raised last week in a Transportation Department inspector general's report.

Jet engines work differently at higher altitudes, and it's unclear whether the relatively inexperienced Pinnacle pilots were aware that they had to be more careful in the thin air at 41,000 feet, the maximum altitude for their plane.

According to FAA transcripts of air-to-ground conversations, an air traffic controller in Kansas City told the two pilots it was rare to see the plane flying that high.

"Yeah, we're actually ... we don't have any passengers on board, so we decided to have a little fun and come up here," one of the pilots said. The transcripts don't identify whether Jesse Rhodes or Cesarz made the statement.

First one, then the other engine shut down. The last contact that controllers had with the crew was at 9,000 feet, when the pilot reported an airport beacon in sight.

At the hearing, NTSB investigators plan to delve into the plane's flight limits and the proper recovery techniques when engines fail. They also want to know if the pilots knew those procedures and to learn the engine's performance characteristics at high altitudes.

On June 2, the FAA issued a special bulletin clarifying what steps pilots need to take to restart an engine when there's a dual engine failure, agency spokeswoman Laura Brown said.

David Stempler, president of the Air Travelers Association, said the issue may be reckless pilots rather than inadequate training or improper recovery procedures.

"This is more a story of pilots having time on their hands and playing with things in the cockpit that they shouldn't," he said.

Flying, he said, is as boring as truck driving most of the time.

"This was boredom and experimentation, these guys experimenting with things they had no business doing," Stempler said.

---

On the Net:

National Transportation Safety Board: http://www.ntsb.gov

AP-ES-06-13-05 1117EDT


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: faa; holdmuhbeer; pilot; plane; planecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last
To: TheOtherOne; HairOfTheDog

ping


21 posted on 06/13/2005 8:59:07 AM PDT by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Idiots.


22 posted on 06/13/2005 9:01:18 AM PDT by Luna (Lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade at Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob



I prefer the good ole days of flight - the days of Stick and Rudder flying.

Most of these Jet Jocks would be lost without a glass cockpit.



23 posted on 06/13/2005 9:02:20 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LKR59; Slings and Arrows; scab4faa

WTF ping

Let me know if you would like on or off the ping list


24 posted on 06/13/2005 9:02:54 AM PDT by Xenophobic Alien (OK gang, you know the rules, no humping, no licking, no sniffing hineys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Maybe they were that incompetent.


25 posted on 06/13/2005 9:05:41 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
This is nonsense. Not only is it NOT wrong for a crew to take an aircraft to its PUBLISHED max altitude, it is a good thing if the light load permitted. Most pilots of commercial jets have been at the PUBLISHED max altitude for their aircraft, so wanting to do that was not wrong for this crew - if in fact 41,000 was the max published altitude.

The question is not whether they should have been at the PUBLISHED max altitude, but whether FL410 was in fact the published max altitude. This article does not answer that question, and blaming the pilots without that information is pure silliness.

If FL410 is the max published altitude for the Canadair, then the fault is not the pilots' for going there.
26 posted on 06/13/2005 9:06:17 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Oh, that's heresy there, that is. Pilot's never make errors...it was the ground's fault that it came up and hit them.


27 posted on 06/13/2005 9:08:35 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

AGL or ASL?

Ooooops!


28 posted on 06/13/2005 9:09:17 AM PDT by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

Try the one I used to work on - The Electric Jet, The Lawn Dart, The Falcon - the F-16A-D. All electric, all the time, unless the generator goes offline and the EPU fails to fire. In that case, it's just several tons of deadweight strapped to the pilot's a$$ - a good launch platform for the ACES II.


29 posted on 06/13/2005 9:10:38 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (The Crew Chief's Toolbox: A roll around cabinet full of specialists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Bombardier built Amtrak's Acela's. They don't perform as advertised, either.


30 posted on 06/13/2005 9:12:17 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

As pilots tend to say they ran out of Altitude, Speed and Ideas all at the same time...


31 posted on 06/13/2005 9:12:27 AM PDT by Syntyr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Two possible explanations is that they slowed below sufficient airspeed for an airstart or that for one reason or another they did not windmill the engine long enough before airstart to overcome rapid cooling brought on by the flameout at high altitude.

Either way, these were a couple of idiots who somehow thought getting an airplane to 41k was a manly feat.

To quote Paul Harvey, "Gonads are useful for their purpose but they are no substitute for brains."

32 posted on 06/13/2005 9:13:25 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
Hey bud, if the engines took them up there, but failed to bring them back, it is the pilots who are at fault. Jet aircraft are not toys to play around with. Unless your jet comes equipped with ejection seats, you don't go anywhere near the limits. They were idiots.
33 posted on 06/13/2005 9:14:17 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (The only thing a man should moisturize is a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
I wonder what kind of engines are used on that aircraft. I've been on commercial flights before that went to 41,000 ft.

Jet engines control themselves by monitoring internal pressures. At high altitudes, the thin air passes through at such a high velocity that the fire gets blown out just like a birthday cake candle. The good ol' P&W engines on the airliner I was on were engineered well enough to accomodate it.

34 posted on 06/13/2005 9:14:40 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paddles
Two possible explanations is that they slowed below sufficient airspeed for an airstart or that for one reason or another they did not windmill the engine long enough before airstart to overcome rapid cooling brought on by the flameout at high altitude.

Quite possibly. I have done airstarts only in the simulator, but they were not that difficult. If you are at 41K, you trade altitude for airspeed--and it doesn't take Einstein to figure that out.

35 posted on 06/13/2005 9:15:26 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
But, you know Bob, that many F-16s have been brought home on a dead stick. Training makes the difference.
36 posted on 06/13/2005 9:15:35 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (The only thing a man should moisturize is a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

It seems FLT410 is the service ceiling of the Bombardier CRJ-200. A beautiful plane, too.


37 posted on 06/13/2005 9:16:07 AM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Icarus - ping!


38 posted on 06/13/2005 9:17:27 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Excrementum Occurum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rudy45
All I can think of right now is that they cavitated the fuel lines somehow. I dunno--need a licensed A&P or A&I on the forum to address this.
39 posted on 06/13/2005 9:18:27 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob

Do you still fly?
If so, what?


In my humble opinion, students would learn to fly in a J3 - or a PA-11/12/15/18 or maybe a Citabria or Champ. Something where they learn the basics - without looking at a bunch of instruments. Feel the seat of their pants and not look to a panel for answers.

The Cirrus, while a stunning airplane with wonderful instrumentation blah blah blah, and that STUPID parachute only makes pilots think they are not in charge of getting their airplane safely on the ground.

"I've got trouble, I'll just pull this little handle and everything will be fine - and no longer my responsibility!"

Barf.

We had a report of a guy who was Instrument Rated and Current in a Cirrus who was on a VFR flight plan and got lost in the clouds and he PULLED THE HANDLE!!!

Perhaps, get on the radio, file or find clear sky - ?

He WASTED a perfectly good airplane because he's a chicken.

/soap box off


40 posted on 06/13/2005 9:18:28 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of FReepers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson