Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW 'SANHEDRIN' CALLS FOR ARCHITECTURAL BLUEPRINT TO REBUILD JEWISH TEMPLE
World Net Daily ^ | Joseph Farah

Posted on 06/11/2005 1:45:05 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

New 'Sanhedrin' Calls For Architectural Blueprint To Rebuild Jewish Temple

The Israeli rabbinical council involved with re-establishing the Sanhedrin, is calling upon all groups involved in Temple Mount research to prepare detailed architectural plans for the reconstruction of the Jewish Holy Temple.

The Sanhedrin was a 71-man assembly of rabbis that convened adjacent to the Holy Temple before its destruction in 70 AD and outside Jerusalem until about 400 AD.

The move followed the election earlier this week of Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz as temporary president of a group aspiring to become Judaism's highest-ranking legal-religious tribunal.

However, although Steinsaltz's involvement with the endeavor adds important rabbinic legitimacy, other major halachic authorities, including Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the leading haredi Ashkenazi spiritual leader, and Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the premier Sephardi halachic opinion, have refused repeated requests to offer their support.

Nevertheless, the group will establish a forum of architects and engineers to begin plans for rebuilding the Temple – a move fraught with religious and political volatility.

The group, which calls itself the Sanhedrin, is calling on the Jewish people to contribute toward the acquisition of materials for the purpose of rebuilding the Temple – including the gathering and preparation of prefabricated, disassembled portions to be stored and ready for rapid assembly, "in the manner of King David."

Rabbi Hillel Weiss, spokesman for the burgeoning Sanhedrin, said in an official statement that because of "concerns that external pressure would be brought to bear upon individuals not to take part in the establishment of a Sanhedrin, the names of most participants have been withheld up to this point."

"The increasingly anti-Jewish decisions handed down by the Supreme Court prove the need for an alternative legal system based on Jewish sources," said Weiss. "More and more people, including Torah scholars, are beginning to understand this."

The Sanhedrin was reestablished last October in Tiberias, the place of its last meeting 1,600 years ago. Since then, it has met in Jerusalem on a monthly basis.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: sanhedrin; templemount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-276 next last
To: muawiyah
""God" is an Anglo-Saxon word better applied to Thor than to the "God of Abraham"."

What are you on anyway? God was the creater of the Universe, centuries before the Anglo/Saxon language came into being.

There is an old Confutze saying that you should take to heart: It is better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool, than to open it.......and remove all doubt.

101 posted on 06/11/2005 4:01:51 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
It was? Prove it!

What you have is something that's accepted as "fact", but where is the cooborative evidence?

This happens to be why archaeology is so important when it comes to Temple Mount. If a Temple is to be built, we need to know if this really is the site, and not just something accepted as the site.

102 posted on 06/11/2005 4:02:25 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
The Rebbi Meier Schneerson pretty much said the same thing about the Temple (even though he had followers who thought him to be the Messiah, and who were all anxious to get about rebuilding the Temple).

Schneerson was usually way ahead of his followers, and still is.

I miss the old guy.

103 posted on 06/11/2005 4:04:45 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Southern Baptists
They do not celebrate Christmas Day (much like many other Scandinavian groups otherwise in the Laestidian wing of belief), but you can still find congregations that not only reject doctors, they reject dentists, so when the peyote they use loosens their teeth, they just fall right out.

Bwahhahhaahaahaaa!!

Okay, I'm convinced. You are insane!
104 posted on 06/11/2005 4:08:06 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor
I don't think an altar is required to be saved, although I do believe that an altar (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) is used to present the Lord's Supper.

There are variations on this belief, but if you celebrate Holy Communion you hardly set the bread and wine on the floor!

If you do not celebrate Holy Communion, I would be persuaded that you are not Christian.

105 posted on 06/11/2005 4:08:15 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

We are speaking of a word spelled "G" "O" "D", not G-D. Thor was a god, for example.


106 posted on 06/11/2005 4:09:32 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

>>I don't think an altar is required to be saved<<

Phew! THAT'S a relief! I was getting worried there for a minute.


107 posted on 06/11/2005 4:11:02 PM PDT by Humidston (Yo, Hitlary... BRING IT ON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
"Breathing makes Muslims hopping mad."

Excellent comment, dear Leapfrog.... and right on the mark. Everything that isn't contributive to "The New Caliphate" makes Muslims hopping mad. And.....make no mistake. They're all working like a busy bee hive to bring about this "New Caliphate."

Question: Don't these eager-beaver "moderate" American Muslim groups (CAIR, MPAC etc) understand that the "new caliphate" equals the now extinct Talibanic Afghanistan?...Where would worker bees like Ibrahim Hooper and Sarah Elkanawah end up, if the "new caliphate" became a global reality? They don't seem to be looking ahead down the road they are so assiduously traveling.

Char

108 posted on 06/11/2005 4:11:13 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
Your blind as a bat ~ I said no such thing about Southern Baptists.

You should go back and read slowly and catch all the subtle nuances like DIFFERENT PARAGRAPHS, DIFFERENT WORDS, DIFFERENT RELIGIONS.

109 posted on 06/11/2005 4:12:08 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

You need an altar to conveniently serve communion to large numbers of Christians.


110 posted on 06/11/2005 4:13:05 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"David's Temple was where? Then there's Solomon's Temple. It was destroyed by the Egyptians. It was replaced."

You are really showing your total ignorance of Biblical History. There was NO David's Temple. He was not permitted by God to built it because he shed blood. That task was given to his son Solomon. That Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar in 586 B.C.. It was rebuilt by the Jews under the edict of King Cyrus of Persia: "Thus says Cyrus, King of Persian: All the kingdoms of the Earth the LORD God of Heaven has given to me, and He has commanded me to build Him a house at Jerusalem (Yerushalayim), which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all His People? May his God be with him! Now let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the House of the LORD God of Israel (He is God), which is in Jerusalem. And whoever remains in any place where he sojourns, let the men of his place help him with silver and gold, with goods, and livestock, besides the freewill offerings for the House of GOD which is in Jerusalem." Ezra 1:14. The Second Temple was inhanced by Herod, and it was destroyed 40 years after Jesus began His minstry by General Titus Flavius Vespasian in 70 A.D.

111 posted on 06/11/2005 4:13:37 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

You ready yet Leapfrog? Did you go back and READ ALL THE STUFF, not just the part you agreed with?


112 posted on 06/11/2005 4:14:13 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The Levites have a special "cohinem" gene on the Y Chromosome. It's real easy to find them. There are, in fact, more than enough!

So, does God look down on their sacrifices and accept them?

113 posted on 06/11/2005 4:14:16 PM PDT by feedback doctor (If you won't love the least of people, then you can't love any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
God is not etymologically related to good. It probably came from an Indo-European *ghut-. This may be related to Sanskrit havate and Old Church Slavonic zovetu, both meaning 'call,' and if so the underlying etymological meaning of god would be 'that which is invoked.' The English word's immediate ancestor was prehistoric Germanic *guth-,which also produced German gott, Dutch god, and Swedish and Danish gud (dictionary of word origins).
114 posted on 06/11/2005 4:16:09 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Ah, yes. You meant "Apostolic Charismatic Church of the First Born" as a different denomination.

My my mistake, I've never heard of it before.

A quick Google of said church (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Apostolic+Charismatic+Church+of+the+First+Born%22&btnG=Google+Search) yields all of three entries... two of which were authored by *ding-ding* YOU!

(Or, shall I call you "TainanCowboy?")

115 posted on 06/11/2005 4:22:39 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You ready yet muawiyah? Did you go back and READ ALL THE STUFF, not just the part you agreed with?


116 posted on 06/11/2005 4:27:39 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"That's so pretentious to use the YHWH business when EL is probably closer to the original."

You continue to show your total ignorance of Biblical history. "El or Elohim" was FIRST name that was given to mankind by God in the Garden of Eden. In Genesis He revealed a second name to Abraham: "EL Shaddai" - "God Almighty", But in Exodus, He reveals another of His Names to Moses (Moshe). Exodus 6:2-3 : And God spoke to Moses and said to him: "I AM the LORD. I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and to Jacob, as "God Almighty", but by My Name LORD I was NOT KNOWN TO THEM. LORD is the English for YHWH.

117 posted on 06/11/2005 4:29:20 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
OK, David was prohibited from building what he wanted, but he was a rebellions man. There are other sites throughout the ancient land of Canaan that look exactly like the layout Hebrews used for their tabernacles and temples.

May we suggest that an Egyptian sacked the Temple and hauled off the treasure. Try 2 Kings 22 starting with 1 and the word "Josi'ah.

What do you imagine has happened in between to cause such devastation to the House of the Lord (i.e. The Temple) to require major repair, and why are these people down to ONE REMAINING COPY OF THE LAW?

BTW, they not only had only one copy, they had a hard time putting it all back together! That meant that the entire caste of men who memorized the entire Torah had disappeared.

Might we suggest that the Egyptians had come in, smacked them down, hauled off the loot, and then disappeared leaving the Jews alone in their little part of the world.

This all happens before the Babylonian devastation.

118 posted on 06/11/2005 4:30:33 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Sounds like an interpretation. However, none of us were there were we. BTW, I'm of that school of thought that the pre-Abramic materials in the Bible drew on the very same written source as the Sumerian materials.

This more readily explains the differences in the name by which God is addressed in the different texts.

There are, of course, theological explanations of all that.

119 posted on 06/11/2005 4:33:28 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
"A temple has to be built exist during the reign of Antichrist..."

Ya meen tah say, POOOOOOOFFFF!!! Tribulation Temple just appears out of thin air?

120 posted on 06/11/2005 4:35:25 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson