Posted on 06/11/2005 9:14:01 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
Nice try, Web.
I haven't been able to read every article yet regarding the newly discovered "wall" within Soviet style commission show trial, but have the "staffers" been identified that were responsible?
Whose staffer's were they?
I wonder why at the time more people did not speak out about this and how potentially (and actually in the wake of 9/11) that this commie C^%&T's memo was.
Hell... I got suspended for posting that. An answer to your question would probably get me banned. ;^D
When I saw this headline on the Latest Comments page, I thought to myself, "Either some New York Senator's aide has been exposed and I misread the story yesterday, or this is a NewsMax article."
According to your logic:
These two sentences: "According to now retired New York Times columnist William Safire, Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell..." "According to the Wall Street Journal, Gorelick fulfilled much the same role as Hubbell had, acting as Hillary's "eyes and ears at the Justice Department."" |
Gorelick was a |
=
|
Biased reporting goes both ways, you know. We're intelligent enough to figure things out for ourselves. This kind of stuff does nothing but insult our intelligence. IMHO.
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.