Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google blocks ad for anti-Clinton book
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 11 June 2005 | Editors

Posted on 06/11/2005 2:18:31 AM PDT by Robert Drobot

Content 'unacceptable' despite search giant's 'Hate Bush' themes

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

A conservative book publisher says the search engine giant Google rejected his ad for a book critical of Bill and Hillary Clinton while continuing to accept anti-Bush themes.

Eric Jackson, CEO of World Ahead, said his ads for "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine" were rejected, without futher explanation, due to "unacceptable content."

Jackson says Google's online ad guidelines make no mention of political content being disallowed.

He points out that while ads for the anti-Clinton book -- which featured images of the book's cover and pictures of the former first couple -- were deemed offensive, the company continues to run ads for overtly liberal advertisers with headlines such as "Hate Bush? So Do We," and "George W. Bush fart doll."

As WorldNetDaily reported, 98 percent of all political donations by Google employees went to support Democrats.

CEO Eric Schmidt gave the maximum legal limit of donations to Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry and to primary candidate Howard Dean.

Schmidt also contributed the maximum amount to Sen. Clinton, whose role in helping her husband intimidate his female accusers is addressed in the new book.

Last month, Google, valued recently at $80 billion, rejected an attempt by the conservative activist group RightMarch.com to run ads critical of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., while continuing to run attack ads against besieged House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas.

Also, Google has agreed to allow the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block "objectionable" search terms such as "democracy." (My emphasis.)

The company came under fire for a recent editorial decision to rank news articles in search results by "quality," giving preferential placement to large and predominately liberal media outlets such as CNN and the BBC over conservative news sources, even if they are more recent or pertinent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ads; antiamerican; bias; bigotry; billary; booksales; candicejackson; censor; china; clinton; commies; communist; content; dean; democracy; ericschmidt; extreme; google; guidelines; hate; leftists; money; newsranking; political; psyops; rightmarchcom; schmidt; theirlives; traitors; unacceptable; usedogpilecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: rdb3
Thanks for saving me the trouble of that google page. An exact search returns about 23,400 hits. I shun google as much as the next conservative, but you gotta give the devil his due.
81 posted on 06/11/2005 8:46:22 PM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: No Truce With Kings
I use Mozilla

I was using Mozilla when I was on dialup, and I'm going to install it on this machine. Thanks for the tip.

82 posted on 06/11/2005 9:27:36 PM PDT by Marauder (Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Google basically shows that it is not independent. They could easily perform the same action with bloggers or any of the none-believers of global warming. Might as well drop it totally if you can't depend on the validity of the search.


83 posted on 06/11/2005 11:45:46 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Anyone have a contact addy for google..Couldnt find one jut now..We should start flooding them with complaints


84 posted on 06/12/2005 12:07:31 AM PDT by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

now would be a good time for every freeper to dump al lthier google stock before it tanks


85 posted on 06/12/2005 1:03:19 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot; All

www.mama.com is agood search engine to use if your tired of google


86 posted on 06/12/2005 1:26:33 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I've now switched to Dogpile, and will never use Google again.


87 posted on 06/12/2005 1:30:34 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy

"Wow. Funky to go from your first link and see Freeperland aka. 2000 and the different appearance. Pretty cool."

Let's see if I can take you even further...

Topic: White Water
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/t990404208.htm


88 posted on 06/12/2005 1:30:41 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Marauder

You need to scan your computer! adaware and spybot are a good start, but look around- there may be newer products out there.

Also, martin_fierro has a list of free utilities, including a virus scanner that I've been using successfully for months now. Ask him.


89 posted on 06/12/2005 4:23:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (...a sheep in wolf's clothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I have Ad-Aware, which is the best I've found that works as well as it does for free. I scan for adware and tracking cookies every time after I've been on line. Word of advice: Microsoft has a free adware scanner - in beta stage - that looks impressive, but as you might expect, it doesn't find any adware. I finally got suspicious of its reporting that everything was "all clear" and reinstalled Ad-Aware.

I downloaded (free) a "smart" popup blocker that seems to work pretty well; it beeps whenever a popup tries to ... well, pop up. Very few get through anymore, and it hasn't blocked any desired screens.

For viruses and other anomalies, I use Norton SystemWorks, which has really done the job well so far, keeping the whole machine scanned for all kinds of problems and fixing them.


90 posted on 06/12/2005 4:50:34 AM PDT by Marauder (Politicians use words the way a squid uses ink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson