Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google blocks ad for anti-Clinton book
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 11 June 2005 | Editors

Posted on 06/11/2005 2:18:31 AM PDT by Robert Drobot

Content 'unacceptable' despite search giant's 'Hate Bush' themes

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

A conservative book publisher says the search engine giant Google rejected his ad for a book critical of Bill and Hillary Clinton while continuing to accept anti-Bush themes.

Eric Jackson, CEO of World Ahead, said his ads for "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine" were rejected, without futher explanation, due to "unacceptable content."

Jackson says Google's online ad guidelines make no mention of political content being disallowed.

He points out that while ads for the anti-Clinton book -- which featured images of the book's cover and pictures of the former first couple -- were deemed offensive, the company continues to run ads for overtly liberal advertisers with headlines such as "Hate Bush? So Do We," and "George W. Bush fart doll."

As WorldNetDaily reported, 98 percent of all political donations by Google employees went to support Democrats.

CEO Eric Schmidt gave the maximum legal limit of donations to Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry and to primary candidate Howard Dean.

Schmidt also contributed the maximum amount to Sen. Clinton, whose role in helping her husband intimidate his female accusers is addressed in the new book.

Last month, Google, valued recently at $80 billion, rejected an attempt by the conservative activist group RightMarch.com to run ads critical of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., while continuing to run attack ads against besieged House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas.

Also, Google has agreed to allow the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block "objectionable" search terms such as "democracy." (My emphasis.)

The company came under fire for a recent editorial decision to rank news articles in search results by "quality," giving preferential placement to large and predominately liberal media outlets such as CNN and the BBC over conservative news sources, even if they are more recent or pertinent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ads; antiamerican; bias; bigotry; billary; booksales; candicejackson; censor; china; clinton; commies; communist; content; dean; democracy; ericschmidt; extreme; google; guidelines; hate; leftists; money; newsranking; political; psyops; rightmarchcom; schmidt; theirlives; traitors; unacceptable; usedogpilecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Google is begging for federal regulation. The geeks have allowed their success go to their heads, allowing money and dominance to dictate their decisions. Agreeing to block any item which includes the word 'democracy' signals Google's willingness to prostitute itself for a few more yen.

"....Google has agreed to allow the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block "objectionable" search terms such as "democracy...."

Pray tell, which other words and or 'terms' has Google agreed to block for the atheist communist government of China?????

That this alleged search engine filters(read censors) news according to the 'quality' of its content, is consistent with the policies of Hitler, Mao, Stalin, New York Times, CBS Television, and Mexico's Fox. These American born geeks are the opposite of everything that surrounds them. They are not an American company, because they represent nothing of their American heritage. They are nothing more than internet whores of the New World Order.

1 posted on 06/11/2005 2:18:32 AM PDT by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

I am now usung clusty. Google can kiss my big libertarian butt.


2 posted on 06/11/2005 2:20:33 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (...a sheep in wolf's clothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Don't like their policies, don't use them. Simple economics. If they lose 10% of their traffic, they'll change swift as an intern in the Clinton White House can get to her knees.


3 posted on 06/11/2005 2:20:59 AM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

I just switched my default Mozilla Firefox search engine from Google to Alta Visa. Goodbye Google, you communist rag!


4 posted on 06/11/2005 2:22:10 AM PDT by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

I guess we can add Google to the list of Bill Clinton enablers. The pig Clinton rapes Juanita Broaddrick, and the left-wingers at Google are lining up to drive the getaway car for the bastard.


5 posted on 06/11/2005 2:24:35 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

If some one could dominate Google's stock and get rid of the CEO...


6 posted on 06/11/2005 2:25:10 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

" They are nothing more than internet whores of the New World Order."

I agree.

Here's a start for alternatives:

100's OF SEARCH ENGINES
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3949b4e87a51.htm

AlltheWeb :: find it all
http://www.alltheweb.com/advanced

ProFusion, the original intelligent meta-search engine on the Web, was founded in 1995 at the University of Kansas
http://www.profusion.com/index.htm


7 posted on 06/11/2005 2:25:28 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Maybe a law suit would work.


8 posted on 06/11/2005 2:26:07 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
I would prefer to dress them in a cement suit.
9 posted on 06/11/2005 2:28:17 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger

I use dogpile..it uses a number of search engines and is far better than google.


10 posted on 06/11/2005 2:28:20 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

bookmark.


11 posted on 06/11/2005 2:31:20 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell
The pig Clinton rapes Juanita Broaddrick, and the left-wingers at Google are lining up to drive the getaway car for the bastard. ---

***

Right on. They might even have some ice too.

12 posted on 06/11/2005 2:42:40 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Sounds of laughter, shades of life are ringing through my open ears exciting and inviting me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

This is why I recently switched to AltaVista. I find it to be just as good and I am getting sick of Google's dominance. What goes up must come down.


13 posted on 06/11/2005 3:04:18 AM PDT by rpellegrini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Google does not have a problem accepting billions from the porn industry.

Cretins.

14 posted on 06/11/2005 3:06:35 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

It figures, I heard on the news a couple of days ago that one of the google founders graduated from the People's University of Michigan the biggest communist school in the midwest.


15 posted on 06/11/2005 3:12:51 AM PDT by RushLake (Permission from the UN...we don't need no stinking permission slip from the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
If some one could dominate Google's stock and get rid of the CEO...

I'll get right on it as soon as the market opens Monday morning ;-)

16 posted on 06/11/2005 3:32:10 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Oh, surely the ACLU will come in and put a stop to this blatant, unjust bias. I mean, they're outraged, right?

< /sarc>

17 posted on 06/11/2005 3:38:21 AM PDT by Allegra (OK, I'm Kind of Used to the Keyboard Now. My Typing Just Sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Or you could own a share of Google, then attend their stock holders meeting and personally ask the CEO:

"How do think you are fully meeting your fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders when this company actively, selectively, and repeatedly refuses to accept ad revenue from some legitimate advertisers?"


18 posted on 06/11/2005 3:39:59 AM PDT by HighWheeler (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Just boycott the search engine and use another one.

does using dog pile "credit" google with traffic? Cause it uses Google to search as well as other search engines.

19 posted on 06/11/2005 3:54:29 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
dog pile may or may not do a search of Google in addition to reviewing other search engines to meet client requests, but it hasn't been seen bending over in public to gratify the whim of any commie pinko anti-American degenerates either.
20 posted on 06/11/2005 4:11:05 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson