Posted on 06/11/2005 2:18:31 AM PDT by Robert Drobot
Content 'unacceptable' despite search giant's 'Hate Bush' themes
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A conservative book publisher says the search engine giant Google rejected his ad for a book critical of Bill and Hillary Clinton while continuing to accept anti-Bush themes.
Eric Jackson, CEO of World Ahead, said his ads for "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine" were rejected, without futher explanation, due to "unacceptable content."
Jackson says Google's online ad guidelines make no mention of political content being disallowed.
He points out that while ads for the anti-Clinton book -- which featured images of the book's cover and pictures of the former first couple -- were deemed offensive, the company continues to run ads for overtly liberal advertisers with headlines such as "Hate Bush? So Do We," and "George W. Bush fart doll."
As WorldNetDaily reported, 98 percent of all political donations by Google employees went to support Democrats.
CEO Eric Schmidt gave the maximum legal limit of donations to Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry and to primary candidate Howard Dean.
Schmidt also contributed the maximum amount to Sen. Clinton, whose role in helping her husband intimidate his female accusers is addressed in the new book.
Last month, Google, valued recently at $80 billion, rejected an attempt by the conservative activist group RightMarch.com to run ads critical of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., while continuing to run attack ads against besieged House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas.
Also, Google has agreed to allow the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block "objectionable" search terms such as "democracy." (My emphasis.)
The company came under fire for a recent editorial decision to rank news articles in search results by "quality," giving preferential placement to large and predominately liberal media outlets such as CNN and the BBC over conservative news sources, even if they are more recent or pertinent.
"....Google has agreed to allow the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block "objectionable" search terms such as "democracy...."
Pray tell, which other words and or 'terms' has Google agreed to block for the atheist communist government of China?????
That this alleged search engine filters(read censors) news according to the 'quality' of its content, is consistent with the policies of Hitler, Mao, Stalin, New York Times, CBS Television, and Mexico's Fox. These American born geeks are the opposite of everything that surrounds them. They are not an American company, because they represent nothing of their American heritage. They are nothing more than internet whores of the New World Order.
I am now usung clusty. Google can kiss my big libertarian butt.
Don't like their policies, don't use them. Simple economics. If they lose 10% of their traffic, they'll change swift as an intern in the Clinton White House can get to her knees.
I just switched my default Mozilla Firefox search engine from Google to Alta Visa. Goodbye Google, you communist rag!
I guess we can add Google to the list of Bill Clinton enablers. The pig Clinton rapes Juanita Broaddrick, and the left-wingers at Google are lining up to drive the getaway car for the bastard.
If some one could dominate Google's stock and get rid of the CEO...
" They are nothing more than internet whores of the New World Order."
I agree.
Here's a start for alternatives:
100's OF SEARCH ENGINES
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3949b4e87a51.htm
AlltheWeb :: find it all
http://www.alltheweb.com/advanced
ProFusion, the original intelligent meta-search engine on the Web, was founded in 1995 at the University of Kansas
http://www.profusion.com/index.htm
Maybe a law suit would work.
I use dogpile..it uses a number of search engines and is far better than google.
bookmark.
***
Right on. They might even have some ice too.
This is why I recently switched to AltaVista. I find it to be just as good and I am getting sick of Google's dominance. What goes up must come down.
Cretins.
It figures, I heard on the news a couple of days ago that one of the google founders graduated from the People's University of Michigan the biggest communist school in the midwest.
I'll get right on it as soon as the market opens Monday morning ;-)
< /sarc>
Or you could own a share of Google, then attend their stock holders meeting and personally ask the CEO:
"How do think you are fully meeting your fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders when this company actively, selectively, and repeatedly refuses to accept ad revenue from some legitimate advertisers?"
does using dog pile "credit" google with traffic? Cause it uses Google to search as well as other search engines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.