Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"This could literally put us out of business,” Paul Stankavich, president of the Alaska Public Radio Network, an alliance of 26 stations in the state, told the Post.

That's the idea!

This is great news, there is no reason our tax money should be used to fund anti-American propoganda.

1 posted on 06/10/2005 2:52:17 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: wagglebee

They call it "listener-supported radio" here in Indiana. Could it really be "taxpayer supported radio"? Hmmm.


2 posted on 06/10/2005 2:57:08 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

sounds good to me.


3 posted on 06/10/2005 2:57:09 PM PDT by tdewey10 (End abortion now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Let's hope NPR is next!


4 posted on 06/10/2005 2:57:34 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
We know were you live.

And they call us simple minded.

/// for the sarcasm impaired.

He's Got A Plan

Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

5 posted on 06/10/2005 2:59:15 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Man, You should have seen them, kickin Edgar Allen Poe! Koo Koo Kachoo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

excellent! let Elmo rot in hell


6 posted on 06/10/2005 2:59:28 PM PDT by Vaquero (an armed society is a polite society (Heinlien).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Cable and satellite more than fulfill alternative, narrowcast interests, subjects, and audiences.

Satellite radio, for a few bucks per month, more than meet demand for mainstream, crazy, and even questionable radio programing. More power to it!

Both are privately funded. Both do what PBS does, and for far less.

I used to work at a PBS affiliate. We don't need them since someone else is doing what they do, and far more efficiently.

Stop the poison. Stop PBS.

7 posted on 06/10/2005 3:01:20 PM PDT by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Yeah, Congress "looks" to reform the tax code, too.

As long as the Senate exists in its current form, I'll hold off on making any plans for celebration.


8 posted on 06/10/2005 3:01:31 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

20 years too late!


9 posted on 06/10/2005 3:01:42 PM PDT by G Larry (Promote Conservative Judges NOW! YOU BUNCH OF COWARDS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Don't these public stations pay huge sums for the syndicated spew? Let the local stations come up with their own programming and sell it. There's a Garrison Keillor in every small town just waiting to bloviate.


12 posted on 06/10/2005 3:04:26 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Hey Paul, you are not in 'business' when you don't have to earn a profit. You lived in a dream world by living off of large corporate donations and tax moeney.

So, get a real job and actually MAKE A PROFIT.


13 posted on 06/10/2005 3:05:33 PM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Nevertheless, Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, said the Republicans "are trying to put their ideological stamp on public broadcasting.”

What an idiot. This will in no way change the liberal bias of PBS. This isn't about content as much as it's about what the need is to support this network anymore.

True, it's biased. But it doesn't need taxpayer money to survive. Cut it loose.

14 posted on 06/10/2005 3:05:37 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
In a move seen as a Republican attack on public broadcasting and its "liberal bias,” a GOP-controlled House subcommittee has voted to cut federal funding for public television and radio nearly in half.

I wonder why Carl put quotation marks around the phrase "liberal bias"?

16 posted on 06/10/2005 3:07:43 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Great. Don't "fix" it. Don't "balance" it. Kill it.

One small reduction in government's all pervasive and insatiable presence. The good shows will get picked up commercially so all this 'hiding behind Big Bird' is just a crock anyway.


17 posted on 06/10/2005 3:08:25 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
No Tote bag for you.


18 posted on 06/10/2005 3:08:42 PM PDT by JOE6PAK ("Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Moyers made millions from PBS.

The government paid for all the production fees of his product and then he resold them and kept all the profit.

Great work if you can get it.


20 posted on 06/10/2005 3:10:40 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
the only thing i can say in defense of npr is that I like the lack of commercials...same with public tv...
those commercials really wear you down...a few weeks ago, the wife timed her soap: 38 minutes of show + 22 minutes of commercials.

That's too many commercials!


21 posted on 06/10/2005 3:13:58 PM PDT by Charles Wickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
There are ‘must-do,’ ‘need-to-do’ and ‘nice-to-do’ programs that we have to pay for. [Public broadcasting] is somewhere between a ‘need-to-do’ and a ‘nice-to-do.’

I think he forgot "irritating to the taxpayer", "total waste of money", and "intrinsically harmful."

I would argue PBS is somewhere between "total waste of money" and "intrinsically harmful."

22 posted on 06/10/2005 3:15:10 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The move would eliminate a $23 million federal program that helps underwrite popular children’s shows such as "Sesame Street” and "Postcards From Buster.”

Boo hoo. That money also underwrites Bill Moyers' latest irrelevant pap and the rest of the PBS Hate America claptrap. Oscar the Grouch and Buster will be just fine. Or they can get day jobs.

Republicans "are trying to put their ideological stamp on public broadcasting.”

"Which is completely unacceptable. Everyone knows that liberalism is the only ideology that's tolerated within the public broadcasting arena!"

"This could literally put us out of business,”

Egad! Not THAT!

24 posted on 06/10/2005 3:17:13 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
and "Postcards From Buster.”

But... but... but how are children supposed to learn about Vermont lesbians and what they do in the woods?

25 posted on 06/10/2005 3:17:25 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Great idea. Toss in the UN and lets make it a defunding "twofer"...


27 posted on 06/10/2005 3:21:17 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson