Skip to comments.
Downing Street Memo Impeachment Rumblings a Joke (Even Salon.com admits this)
Salon.com ^
| 6/9/05
| Cass Sunstein
Posted on 06/09/2005 1:06:41 PM PDT by lastfreeamerican
At the very worst, Bush was committed, early on and for multiple reasons, to using force to remove a brutal dictator from office, and he hyped and distorted the evidence to convince the American public of the need for imminent military action. (In my own view, by the way, Bush believed in good faith that Saddam posed a genuine threat to American security, partly because of Saddam's willingness to support terror, partly because of Saddam's own military goals.)
Compare the behavior of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in World War II, who secretly and unlawfully transferred arms -- including more than 20,000 airplanes -- to England. Roosevelt deceived both Congress and the American public about what he was doing. It would have been preposterous to claim that Roosevelt thereby committed an impeachable offense.
So too for Bush. In any four-year period, the nation's leader is highly likely to deceive the public on a serious matter at least once -- sometimes inadvertently, sometimes for legitimate reasons, sometimes for illegitimate ones. Of course presidents should not exaggerate evidence, and it's perfectly proper to ask whether Bush got us into war under false pretenses. But there isn't anything close to a sufficient basis for impeachment.
It's obvious that the call for impeachment of Bush is impractical; it's simply a nonstarter, a publicity stunt, reality-free television. But it's also an irresponsible and even nutty idea in principle -- the lunatic left imitating the lunatic right. Can we talk about something else instead?
(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blair; britishmemo; clinton; downingstreetmemo; impeachment; intelligence; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
That's right. Even if the Downing Street Memo was legitimate, and even if the Dems had a majority in Congress, impeachment proceedings would still be unconstitutional in this case. Of course, that's not going to stop Kerry, Pelosi, Reid, Conyers and Biden from shrieking about it, but the Constitution apparently means nothing to them anyway.
To: lastfreeamerican
Quick, someone post this over at DU! Just don't think you might not get banned for doing so.
To: lastfreeamerican
I'm surprised Salon.com still exists.
3
posted on
06/09/2005 1:11:24 PM PDT
by
68skylark
To: lastfreeamerican
Kerry, Pelosi, Reid, Conyers and Biden all know that nothing will happen. They're simply rallying the nuts.
4
posted on
06/09/2005 1:14:36 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
To: lastfreeamerican
5
posted on
06/09/2005 1:20:14 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(It's not up to the gov't to give you an education. It's up to you to take it from them......)
To: cripplecreek
Downing Street Minutes hearing scheduled for next week, starring Joe Wilson.
6
posted on
06/09/2005 1:23:21 PM PDT
by
soupcon
To: need_a_screen_name; All
Also please give this article to that EGOMANIAC John Conyers! He is planning on bringing that stupid letter to Bush on July 16th. And they are going to hold some stupid Hippy Rally on the same day in Washingon!
7
posted on
06/09/2005 1:24:14 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: lastfreeamerican
The whole purpose of the minority party filing articles of impeachment is to demonstrate that ALL such articles are just parisan politics and therefore Bill (and Hill) Clinton, even though he was impeached, did nothing wrong. They are providing legacy help to Bill and trying to take an issue off the table for Hill in 08.
8
posted on
06/09/2005 1:24:27 PM PDT
by
Soliton
(Alone with everyone else.)
To: cripplecreek
'They're simply rallying the troops.'
For once the Shrieking Eels in the Dem party seem to be unsuccessful. The public knows about this. It's been out in the open for 2 months, but no one cares. Or maybe most Dems have finally realized that it's counterproductive to make defamatory remarks about your own country while its at war.
To: Soliton
10
posted on
06/09/2005 1:24:52 PM PDT
by
Soliton
(Alone with everyone else.)
To: lastfreeamerican
It is so much fun watching the DU's...
It is like a cartoon with Daffy Duck or Elmer Fudd...
The MSM slings a shovel full of mud around...
The DU's pick up a bit and start running around screaming "We got the smoking gun!!! Impeach!!! Impeach!!! Impeach!!!"...
They eventually either run out of steam, hit a wall, or trip over a piece of reality sticking out of the ground...
Lather, Rinse, Repeat...
This has been the DU for as long as I have monitored it...
Better then the clowns at the circus and you can watch them for free!!!
Of course, you have to 'donate' to use any search functions.
That right there shows the inherent delusions they suffer from. If you want to charge a fee for something. Call it a fee not a 'donation' for Pete's sake. Is it possible for DU to be realistic about anything?
To: lastfreeamerican
They aren't going to impeach Bush. That won't prevent them from trying, however.
They're always on the political offensive. Always.
To: cripplecreek
They're simply rallying the nuts.
-----
It is all they know how to do, other than raise taxes and spend on vote-buying welfare programs. Welcome to the irrelevant left.
13
posted on
06/09/2005 1:28:03 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: lastfreeamerican
Even if it is from Salon, and whatever the writer politics are...there speaking cold rational common sense, at least here
14
posted on
06/09/2005 1:28:58 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(When the State ASSUMES death...It makes an ASH out of you and me..)
To: lastfreeamerican
Cass Sunstein tries to make the point that Clinton's impeachment was unconstitutional. I really wish the left would wake up and realize that subverting a citizens due process rights by commiting perjury about sex is the same as subverting due process by lying about murder.
Clinton's impeachment was based on his abuse of the Constitution...and that is one of the very few justifiable acts for impeachement. Apparently Cass didn't learn much in law school.
15
posted on
06/09/2005 1:31:38 PM PDT
by
jess35
To: lastfreeamerican
Of course presidents should not exaggerate evidence, and it's perfectly proper to ask whether Bush got us into war under false pretenses. But there isn't anything close to a sufficient basis for impeachment.
'specially since Clinton signed the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998" (Public Law 105-338). Not only did it call for Saddam Hussein's ouster, it also spelled out the goal of replacing his regime with a democratic Iraq.
Impeached for carrying out the law ?
16
posted on
06/09/2005 1:34:28 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
( Social Security...neither social nor secure.)
To: EagleUSA
"They're simply rallying the nuts."
Exactly. Dean plays the fool and the Democratic leadership plays the role of the straight man.
Dean's Stalinist spew is part of DNC propaganda. They aren't going to alienate the lunatics on the Left. They will, however, feign moral outrage with a wink and a nod.
The entire thing is a charade, nothing more than cynical, lying propaganda.
To: lastfreeamerican
Does it even occur to them that Cheney takes over if they can (ROFLMAO!) pull this off? They hate him even more than Bush.
Delusional morons. Every last one of them. Quit wasting my tax dollars!
18
posted on
06/09/2005 1:38:52 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Lost Dutchman
It is like a cartoon with Daffy Duck or Elmer Fudd... Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm huntin' wabbits!
19
posted on
06/09/2005 1:41:38 PM PDT
by
6SJ7
To: lastfreeamerican
What ever happened to the Poodle's plans to bring this up on the senate floor last Monday?
20
posted on
06/09/2005 1:52:41 PM PDT
by
alnick
(Rice 2005: We've only just begun to see what Freedom can achieve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson