Posted on 06/08/2005 5:39:25 PM PDT by 4.1O dana super trac pak
I disagree....
Bush's opinion is very very clear..
He's for the continued dumbing down of America through massive illegal alien insurgency.. ON PURPOSE.. The extreme lack of attention is a very clear message.. Or worse makeing them citzens to make the "problem" go away..
The only ones vague on his stand are morons.. True.. there are quite a few republican morons serveing in D.C... maybe THATS why he deemed to make himself clear to the perpetually clueless..
The extreme lack of attention to the Mexican border is its OWN message.. Bush being Vincente Fox's main squeeze is another but related subject.. The well thought out importation of millions of Proto-Democrats and wards of the States would be a mystery if Bush's fiscal propensitys didn't "out" him.. Kinda makes Bush comeing out for Arlen Spectre very logical..
Americas public schools have dumbed America quite well.. must not be fast enough though... Americas globalists must be in a hurry.. for a populace that will vote in a globalist agenda.. which would be very much more neat than a messy Coup D'Etat..
Well I disagree.
The "pivotal election year" was 2000. We hoped, after Scumbag's 8 years, that we would get a conservative, American first Constitutionalist in the White House.
What we got was a good decent man in Bush, but he is NOT a conservative on fiscal issues, he is NOT a Constitutionalist on national sovereignty issues like border control, and Bush has helped accelerate this nation into third-world status. California will have 64 million people in 30 years. There will be gridlock, few taxpayers, and a TOTAL socialistic state in CA in 30 years. The population will be dominated by illegals and children of illegals with little education other than knowing how to get to the welfare office.
So goes CA--so goes the nation.
You need to stop this "wait till next election" stuff. 2000 was THE PIVOTAL ELECTION, not 2006. We had our chance, and Bush and the other RINOs killed us.
Crap. We cannot even ask if someone is a legal citizen? Can we bother to ask if they are a terrorist? ;) This immigration mess steams me.
"A better solution to the problem of illegal immigration is a guest worker program. I am in the process of developing a program that would allow employers to use temporary workers in jobs that would otherwise by hard to fill. Unlike other programs that have been discussed, however, my program would require temporary workers to return home after a fixed period of time . . ." --Tom Tancredo
Here is where we are--Tom Tancredo, the only real voice for border control, now believes in illegal aliens working here.
I got history for you, Tancredo--this nation in the early to mid 1900s became the most powerful nation on earth and the industries employed only legal residents. Your false concern that "some industries depend on "immigrants" [Tancredo's politically correct way of describing illegal aliens] is BS--let those "industries" fail! We somehow had these industries survive and prosper well before illegals dominated these industries.
Folks, let's face it. We have nobody in government--repeat nobody--that is fighting to preserve this nation, now that Tancredo has gone leftist. The explosive birthrate of illegal aliens will swamp our welfare system--it is happening now in CA, and CA will have 64 million people in 30 years, mostly first and second generation illegals/children of illegals.
As I stated in another post, FreeRepublic.com was founded to help impeach Bill Clinton. At that time, we were fighting to preserve honor and tradition by hoping to force out a felon from the White House.
My hope is FreeRepublic.com is a central part of a groundswell of freedom loving Americans who help implement a 2nd American Revolution, to preserve and reclaim the principles of legality, law and order, national sovereignty and a future for our following generations. There is no political group/party that will do this for us. The Republicans have shown us they will not fight to stop and reverse this disintegration (filibuster, border control, etc.)
If we save the nation, it will have to come from us, from a 2nd American Revolution. The stark reality is that the Republicans will never be the force to help preserve our nation.
Damn I hope you're wrong..
Been saying the same thing hoping I was WRONG myself..
Enough said..
Can't get out of my mind that John Kerry running against Bush was just a litte too convient for me.. The democrat party is full of moonbats.. but Kerry being selected to run against a sitting President "at war".. screams out to me "FIXED"... Of all people "KERRY".. with his negatives.. I already have all the tin foil I need,, and know how to use it...LoL..
I fear America is already too dumbed down to fight back..
Its about priorities. Importing poverty while the welfare state is still around? Brilliant
Are you a member of the Libertarian Party?
No border inforcement MUST come first or there will be a flood to get in and jump on the bandwagon
Do they think we are fools?
The "let them eat cake " government continues.
I think the real problem is that we DO understand the plan
I read the link and, while it is disheartening that he would support a guest worker program, I guess that's the compromise we'd have to accept. Unfortunately, he's still the best hope we've got.
He seems serious about enforcing it, but it would have to come with the tenets that anchor babies aren't citizens automatically. Also, the borders would have to be militarized and the people strictly monitored. America definitely isn't ready for ANYTHING like a guest worker program yet, and I think he knows that. He might have just been speaking rhetorically, like if a few things happen first then he might consider it. He definitely doesn't believe in all-out amnesty, so for that I'll stick with him.
I'm still a little pissed though.
LOL. This is FreeRepublic.com, isn't it?
Remember how doomed we were with unemployment and outsourcing in 2003? Remember how doomed we were with China in 2004? I guess we're back to be doomed by Mexico again in 2005. I don't know... Mexico doom seems so early 90s to me. Oh well, it's Free Republic so I guess all doom is good doom. This place is fonking hysterical, imho.
No. I'm a proud Republitarian.
A public hospital? If so, then that's excellent news, and you should understand why. Less government. Start a private one or invest in the group that will. Make some money. This is a good opportunity. (And with your new private hospital, you'll have no obligation to admit "illegals" and can charge them whatever you'd like.)
Quit trying to fix government programs with government solutions. That's called Socialism.
You sound just like the big government fans who say tax cuts should be off limits unless spending is cut as well.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Especially in the case of government programs.
...still waiting.
Our conservative talk show hosts across the country are voicing our disgust at the Republican party for their cowardly stance on illegal immigration and we need to hit our party harder than we have. Our talk show hosts are getting it out there for us and we need to do our part.
Ever hear of EMTALA??????
That's nice. I thought you were looking for the answer to the problems. Not more government solutions. My bad.
Your faith in government is pretty fierce for a self-described "conservative".
EMTALA is only for Medicare-participating hospitals, fwiw. But you should be supporting its repeal as well. Not blaming immigrants for taking away your socialist programs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.