Lando 
Posted on 06/07/2005 8:06:24 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
There can be no doubt that the media is in the throes of self-congratulatory excess as a result of Mark Felt having been mis-identified as the mythical Deep Throat. The celebration continues unabated notwithstanding the existence of evidence that might lead one to conclude that the lynchpin of the affair is fictional.
In a February 18, 2005 interview by Fox News personality Sheppard Smith, historian Eric Burns stated:
Burns: "The noted historian, who had at Simon & Schuster the same editor as Woodward and Bernstein. Stephen Ambrose told me this. There is in the safe at Simon & Schuster a copy of the first manuscript draft of All the President's Men. In it there is no Deep Throat. What does that mean? Deep Throat was a later insertion. Why? Because an editor at Simon & Schuster…Alice Mayhew…said two things to these cub reporters…First, your book has so many sources…it's…hard for the reader to keep up…your book is lacking…in narrative drive. I mean, it's like a bunch of newspaper articles…but I have…one solution to both problems. Let's tie all your sources into one source, and let's make him a mystery man.”
That the press' orgiastic behavior might rest on such narrow pretense should not be surprising, because Watergate is the mantra from which springs the media’s Big Juju and the fact that Mr. Felt is now non-compos-mentis should strike any skeptical journalist as a bit too convenient.
The focus we find of interest here is how it demonstrates the media's double standard on such matters.
Actually double standard is a bit tame since the New York Times has been in the forefront of pushing the envelope of what constitutes freedom of the press to the point that, as demonstrated in the 1964 SCOTUS case NY Times v Sullivan, now the First Amendment protects newspapers against publication of even false statements about public officials unless the claimant can demonstrably prove that the publisher knew the information to be wrong and acted with malice in publishing it.
As a result, the press is essentially unconstrained in its ability to savage – selected - officials. The leftist media maintain that it is the their right and responsibility to disseminate classified information regardless of whether it might be injurious to national security as was evidenced by the New York Times’ and Washington Post’s June 1971 publishing of the so-called Pentagon Papers.
While they established their reputations at the expense of Richard Nixon, the actions of the Kennedy’s a decade earlier escape their serious comment to this day.
Actually it’s far more than reputation which is at the heart of the matter here. It's essence is a process whereby the popular vote can be nullified - a legitimized Fourth Estate sponsored regicide that hinges on political bias.
Though apparently not many are aware of it, during the mid 1970s, when the Democrat congress – still sex-flushed and in bed with the press over having driven Richard Nixon from office – nearly destroyed the domestic and foreign intelligence apparatus of the United States, hundreds of thousands of pages of highly classified documents were opened to the public via freedom of information act lawsuits.
While the intent [by bombastic clowns like Senator Frank Church] of this broad fishing expedition was to further damage the guarantors of American security, some of the documents - had they been pursued with any zeal - would rank alongside anything which came out of Watergate affair.
Below from official FBI documents made public via the FOIA and available in .pdf format at the FBI website Martin Luther King documents
“In October 1963, the Director forwarded a request to the Attorney General [Robert Kennedy] for technical surveillance of Dr. King’s residence and the SCLC office in New York City…the FBI received authorization for technical surveillance and it was instituted almost immediately…The security investigation of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was predicated on the belief that they were under the influence of the Communist Party, United States of America (CPUSA)…The security investigation continued for almost six years until Dr. King’s death.”
Additionally:
“In October 1963, Attorney General Robert Kennedy approved an FBI request for permission to install wiretaps on phones in Dr. King's home and in the SCLC's New York and Atlanta offices to determine the extent, if any, of "communist influence in the racial situation." – Book III Senate Select Committee Report on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans – April 23, 1976
What does this mean?
Well it means that the Kennedy brothers believed that Martin Luther King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference were acting at the behest of the Communist Party USA [CP USA], while at the same time they publicly continued to give the impression that they were fully supportive of the civil rights movement despite its "taint."
During the four years of RFK’s leadership of the Justice Department [and as his brother's constant advisor] Dr. King was surveiled - constantly followed and photographed. His home and over a dozen hotels in which he stayed were bugged using wiretaps, microphones and even video recording gear.
Multi-sourced reports substantiate the claim that Dr. King was caught en-flagrante more than one time under this surveillance and that he was made aware of the existence of this information.
If this is not a national scandal at least as serious as Richard Nixon attempting to stop national security damaging leaks of classified military documents at a time of war you had better adjust your perspective and correct for bias.
But the Kennedy’s transgressions [John and Robert – Teddy is another matter entirely] didn’t stop there.
From the earliest moments of the administration, the Kennedys pushed American intelligence for “solutions” to thorny diplomatic problems; every means legal, questionable and illegal was used.
Assassinations as in the case of South Vietnam's Ngo Dinh Diem, the use of psychoactive drugs, blackmail, poison pen guns, even beard depilatory powders - nothing was outside the realm of possibility when the threat was deemed sufficient by the Kennedy's.
Returning to the domestic front, upon Robert’s insistence the FBI conducted illegal surveillance on every suspected major organized crime and many prominent labor figures in the United States, as some allege, to the point of finally earning JFK a nasty payback in 1963 while campaigning in Dallas.
Contrast Kennedy’s rash and extreme actions – absent in most cases even rudimentary judicial oversight – with Richard Nixon who in a ham-fisted manner, attempted to deal with a domestic insurrection.
The revolutionary fervor of this movement was stoked by people of the ilk of John Kerry, Jane Fonda, Daniel Ellsberg, the Berrigan brothers, the CP USA and other useful idiots. Their combined hectoring could effectuate millions of people to take to the streets, the bombing of military and research facilities and cause Marxist Black Panthers to march on Sacramento California with loaded assault rifles. Concurrently, a hard-core communist government in North Vietnam fed off the energy of these efforts while 50,000 of America's sons died miserably in Southeast Asian rice paddies.
And of course this doesn't even begin to broach either the extent to which both Kennedy brothers subjected themselves to potential blackmail by their descent into moral terpitude or the curious circumstances surrounding JFK's 1960 razor-thin - live from Cook County - electoral victory.
If the Kennedy’s 1,000 days of lawless behavior is defensible, why not Nixon's petit-mal infractions?
If however what Richard Nixon did was so egregious as to be punishable by expulsion from the presidency, shouldn't the reputation of America’s twin martyrs JFK and RFK be similarly re-assessed?
We see no appetite whatsoever for the latter by Dan Rather, Bob Woodward or Simon and Schuster...odd.
This is why as we continue to observe the gratuitous genuflection by the media toward the Washington Post, CBS and the New York Times over the last three weeks our sense of tolerance has worn a might thin, as well it should to anyone who has even a moderate grasp of what has gone down in this country since November of 1960.
Lando
Spot-on and absolutely right, period.
Well just as I was getting going on the other thread I find someone has beat me to it.
I hate it when that happens, lol.
Compliment jovially accepted, will pass it along, now if the freeputer dudes can figure out how to transfer the comments from the jilted thread to this one, that would be nice.
beat by a stinkin 3 minutes, that just aint right.
Dueling same-topic threads are not an infrequent occurrence around here, BTW.
This is on the mark.
oh come on you cads are all alike, read em jilt em, thank you ma'am.
Thanks, how is Cato?
I resemble resent that remark!
;-)
Lando
synchronize this you threadnapper!
:-(~)
Big Ol' Bump.
bump
This oped has some interesting history about the Kennedy's and how they used the FBI to destroy their enemies.
The mediots ignored that dark side and created the myth of Camelot.
They sure do ignore all of that baggage. Funny [tragic?] thing is that all of this information is readily available simply because the 75 Sentate Intell Committe wanted to kill the CIA and the rest of the apparatus that used to protect us from guys like binny, but when binny comes along all these leftist pukes start pointing fingers at the agencies that they castrated.
Hopefully, some respectable news outlet will document the damage done to America by JFK, Johnson, Carter and Clinton.
Granpa
The MSM will NEVER give you what you want, because you are asking for them to attack what they stand for.
The MSM has created a myth and that is what they live to perpetuate, nope, you will have to rely on the alternative media.
Which is why, I never watch nor read anything from the MSM.
My tagline sums up the MSM.
I think I'm finally now leaning toward the hypothesis that DT is much more a real composite character than simply MF with a few frills added.
All these historical items about LBJ, Kennedy, Nixon and the WashPost cub reporters are adding up to much more than simply a disgruntled agent trying to get the word out.
It is seeming more and more that Felt was one of a group of high-level agents whose covert job description was manipulation of the government and the press.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.