Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Post - Was the Washington Post Used by Democratic Operatives in Maryland?
National Review Online ^ | Tuesday, June 7, 2005 | Stephen Spruiell

Posted on 06/07/2005 8:08:13 AM PDT by kristinn

Last week, Vanity Fair scooped the Washington Post when it revealed the identity of the Post’s legendary anonymous source Deep Throat. Once Vanity Fair had reported that Deep Throat was actually W. Mark Felt of the FBI, speculation began to circulate about his motives for feeding information to the Post. Bob Shieffer on Face the Nation Sunday argued that Felt’s motives were unimportant, because his actions had saved America from becoming “a nation of men, not laws.”

Fair enough. Suppose, however, that Deep Throat had orchestrated the Watergate break-in and then leaked to the Washington Post in order to frame his co-conspirators. Would his motives matter then? Judging by the Post’s recent reporting on a political scandal in Maryland, the motives of anonymous sources feeding information to the paper are not important if the result is a chance to relive the Post’s glory days of Watergate, if only in some small way.

E-spionage In October of 2004, a Maryland state employee named Joseph Steffen entered into a discussion on FreeRepublic.com using the screen name “NCPAC.” Another Free Republic user (or “freeper”) using the screen name “MD4Bush” engaged Steffen in a friendly way on the public message board. The two began exchanging private e-mails, in which they discussed longstanding rumors about the personal life of Baltimore mayor and likely 2006 Maryland gubernatorial candidate Martin O’Malley (D).

In early 2005, the e-mails were “given” to the Washington Post by a source that remains unidentified in the paper’s reporting. Post reporter Matthew Mosk confronted Steffen, who verified that he had written them. When Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich (R) found out that the Post was planning to portray Steffen as part of a coordinated effort to spread rumors about O’Malley, Ehrlich had little choice. He accepted Steffen’s resignation.

SNIP

When I asked Mosk how he could trust the source who gave him the private e-mails from Free Republic, he reminded me that Steffen had confirmed that he had written the e-mails. But this does not tell his readers anything about the way in which these private e-mails were brought to the attention of the Post in the first place. Isn’t that important for readers to know? Don’t readers deserve to know why this source wasn’t named? What does this source have to hide? And why hasn’t the Post made available to its readers the entire e-mail exchange between NCPAC and MD4Bush? Or told its readers about how MD4Bush posted excerpts of the e-mails on Free Republic on February 8 and then vanished? By failing to answer these questions, the Post has failed to live up to its own guidelines.

Who is MD4Bush? “We will find out,” (WBAL-TV reporter) Dave Collins told me. “I have full confidence it’ll come out.” In addition to the reporting of Collins and Miller, Joseph Steffen has retained a lawyer, who said he is attempting to get MD4Bush’s account information from Free Republic. Hopefully the truth will come out before it gets to that point.

Does the Post care about MD4Bush’s identity? Mosk would not tell NRO whether the Post is investigating. It would be in the Post’s best interest to do so. It has already been scooped on the identity of one anonymous source this year.

— Stephen Sprueill reports on the media for National Review Online's new media blog, which debuts today.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: baltimore; ehrlich; md4bush; michellelane; ncpac; omalley; steffen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
This is a lengthy story and well worth reading the whole piece. It's good to see The Washington Post's reporting in this matter being put under scrutiny.
1 posted on 06/07/2005 8:08:13 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn; Jim Robinson

bump


2 posted on 06/07/2005 8:10:22 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
In addition to the reporting of Collins and Miller, Joseph Steffen has retained a lawyer, who said he is attempting to get MD4Bush’s account information from Free Republic,

From what JimRob has said, that lawyer sure ain't gonna need a crowbar to pry out that info.

3 posted on 06/07/2005 8:11:08 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Bump.


4 posted on 06/07/2005 8:11:45 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC; MD4Bush; xcullen; Anti-Bubba182; Mo1; cyncooper; BillF; crushkerry; Howlin; backhoe; ...

MD4Bush Ping!

(FReepmail me if you want on or off the list)


5 posted on 06/07/2005 8:13:17 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Was the Washington Post Used by Democratic Operatives in Maryland?

Bad question. The Washington Post IS a Democratic operative.

6 posted on 06/07/2005 8:17:29 AM PDT by RebelBanker (To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

"Was the Washington Post Used by Democratic Operatives in Maryland?"

Calling Captain Obvious--Captain Obvious to the white courtesy phone....


7 posted on 06/07/2005 8:35:42 AM PDT by SoVaDPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; kristinn

Bump! I'm chomping at the bit here, waiting to see if there's EVER going to be a break in this case!


8 posted on 06/07/2005 8:35:55 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
The rest of the NRO article is definitely worth a read for those who ask why we should care. It also nicely summarizes what we know so far about NCPAC, MD4Bush, Michelle Lane and the rest of the cast of characters.

According to the article, somebody doesn't want MD4Bush unmasked:

When [WBAL-TV Reporter] Collins started reporting these facts [about Michelle Lane], he began to receive calls from important state Democrats, who all sounded like they were reading from the “same script,” he said. “‘Why are you guys trying to expose Deep Throat?’ They all asked me that. And I said, ‘Deep Throat was a source of information, and MD4Bush was possibly an operative. Don’t you see the difference?’ And [they] didn’t.”

Interesting.
9 posted on 06/07/2005 8:39:22 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

BTTT


10 posted on 06/07/2005 8:42:57 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
It leaves out a few details, such as the endless stream of hit and run posters who kept bumping the two O'Malley rumor threads.

Or perhaps endless is the wrong word to use. They ended when NCPAC and MD4BUSH exchanged emails-- months before the story broke. Almost as if whoever it was who had been bumping those threads suddenly had what they needed.

11 posted on 06/07/2005 9:10:57 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Definitelly a good read..............BTTT


12 posted on 06/07/2005 9:18:34 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

When are these clueless reporters going to learn that Free Republic isn't a blog, and that Freepers aren't "bloggers"?


13 posted on 06/07/2005 9:23:26 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
When are these clueless reporters going to learn that Free Republic isn't a blog, and that Freepers aren't "bloggers"?

I think you expect the lemming herd to think not just regurgitate. Keep trying.

14 posted on 06/07/2005 9:36:20 AM PDT by Calusa (Hey Nick, was you ever stung by dead bee?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
Well, unlike the Washington Post, NRO's Stephen Spruiell got it right -- Free Republic is a message board, not a blog. And he didn't call Freepers bloggers.
15 posted on 06/07/2005 9:40:25 AM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Well, one good thing is that the longer it takes in finding out who MD4Bush is, the closer we are to the election, meaning a bombshell will have a greater impact on O'Malley's campaign.


16 posted on 06/07/2005 9:40:54 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Well, one good thing is that the longer it takes in finding out who MD4Bush is, the closer we are to the election, meaning a bombshell will have a greater impact on O'Malley's campaign.

Very good point, because it will take a good long time for the RATS and Wapo to wipe the egg of their face once that happens.
17 posted on 06/07/2005 10:33:12 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; All

Here's what I have on this:

The O'Malley Affair- NCPAC, MD4Bush, Ehrlich, & more
various FR links & stories | 02-13-05 | the heavy equipment guy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342165/posts


18 posted on 06/07/2005 10:46:35 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

RE: In early 2005, the e-mails were “given” to the Washington Post by a source that remains unidentified in the paper’s reporting.

Also, of note, as known by a number of us who have been following this, MD4Bush posted the emails to a seemingly unrelated thread within the time window of publication of the initial WaPo story ...


19 posted on 06/07/2005 11:04:22 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The most obvious explanation for this behavior is that someone who knew that Steffen was NCPAC set him up. The Post did not report this strange activity. Instead, on February 11 Mosk and David Snyder co-wrote a story headlined: “Uproar brings focus on role of bloggers.” The first half of the article focused on Free Republic, its history and its nature as a place where people traffic in rumors and gossip.

It's good to know that all the hard work of spreading rumors and gossip does not go unnoticed by 'journalists'. Mark and David, thumbs up! Great work! It's like a Woodward and Bernstein deja vu!

20 posted on 06/07/2005 11:59:59 AM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson