Posted on 06/04/2005 10:55:19 AM PDT by new cruelty
The head of Wachovia Corp.'s corporate and investment bank sent employees an e-mail to acknowledge employees' emotions "from anger and hurt to guilt and embarrassment" over a report issued detailing the company's past ties to slavery.
"As a white person, I know that I cannot fully appreciate the extent of those feelings, particularly for our African-American teammates. The challenge for all of us, particularly for myself and other whites, is to understand the real issues driving these emotions and appreciate the impact of different life experiences of our colleagues," wrote Steve Cummings in an e-mail sent Thursday, which was obtained by the Observer on Friday.
But it was unclear whether the e-mail was to assuage employees' hurt feelings or to head them off.
Wachovia spokeswoman Carrie Ruddy would not say if Cummings' e-mail was unique or if other managers were issuing similar ones.
The Observer spoke with several African American employees Friday, none of whom said they were angry. In fact, they applauded the company for handling the news so expertly.
"It was well communicated," said one investment banker who is African American and works in Cummings' group but who asked not to be identified.
He also said that he hadn't heard of any rancor among colleagues and that the news really wasn't so surprising.
"Any bank in that era likely did business with wealthy people who owned slaves," he said.
Wachovia published a 109-page report Wednesday detailing profits made by predecessor banks from the use of African American slaves. The company said it prepared the report to comply with a growing number of municipal laws requiring companies seeking city business to acknowledge any profits from slavery.
Chairman and CEO Ken Thompson apologized to employees in a statement. Cummings did the same in his e-mail.
The company deserves credit for being honest about its connection to slavery, said one African American woman who works in information technology there but asked not to be identified.
"This is America, and unfortunately slavery was a dark part of our past. Wachovia was upfront in admitting it," she said. "It was what it was."
The slavery issue is looming large over banks these days.
Local governments from Philadelphia to Los Angeles are requiring disclosure reports. The N.C. House of Representatives is considering similar legislation.
Charlotte's Bank of America Corp. has hired a firm to research archives for evidence of slave-related profits.
Observers outside of the bank have been more critical of Wachovia and its report.
The National Legal and Policy Center, a think tank in Virginia, sees such laws as a way to extract information from companies so lawsuits can be filed seeking reparations for slavery.
Harvard Law professor Charles Ogletree, meanwhile, said this week that the bank's apology was incomplete without a financial component. The bank said it would make such a commitment in the near future to fund African American history education.
I was going to switch to Wachovia, but that thought is now erased.
Any African who lived in that era belonged to an African tribe that practiced slavery.
White slave traders did not run around the African West Coast chasing down slow Africans. They bought African slaves captured in African tribal wars by other Africans.
"This is America, and unfortunately slavery was a dark part of our past. Wachovia was upfront in admitting it," she said. "It was what it was."
And I agree.
Tis PC BS.
With all the restructuring in the banking industry, is there any bank that can't be shown to have done business with slave-owners?
I mean c'mon! And if this goes further towards 'reparations', what are we going to do? Nail all of today's corporate share holders for the 'sins' of past managers 200 years ago? That's insane.
Harvard Law professor Charles Ogletree, meanwhile, said this week that the bank's apology was incomplete without a financial component.
If they want to know who profited the most from slavery, then they should research the national democratic party's past misdeeds.
Bingo!
It is the people who use this bank that are paying, not the corporation.
Time for another couple of trillion bucks to be transferred from productive citizens to nonproductive citizens. We all know how well that worked with the Great Society. Hello, welfare, goodbye black family.
......and the name of my bank? Not Wachovia of course.
Jeezzz!
Good point. It also bears noting that only a tiny percentage of Americans alive at that time ever owned slaves. The popular liberal notion that every American with White skin benefited from slavery just isn't true.
This whole business is nothing but a financial shakedown orchestrated by a few race-bailing poverty pimps.
This garbage of demanding apologies from and punishing a generation for the sins on their ancestors sounds like something straight out of the Koran. No wonder the leftists are so enamored by it.
Anyone heard Dr. Walter Williams' take on this? Don't think he'd give his stamp of approval.
Please let this dog die - get over it, Wachovia.
I think the bank should be willing to give $1 million to any person that was a slave owned by a predecessor company. No fair digging one up, they have to arrive with a heartbeat and documentation.
Otherwise, not a dime for the shakedown artists.
I have never bought into the(white guilt)LIE.
and yes there is much untold truth reguarding the UNcivil
war.I know who i am,what i am and how i think.
Dont need lyers to tell me otherwise.
Its no wonder theres so much hatetred in our GREAT NATION.
Spread the truth,WAKE UP SHEEPLE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.