Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Touts Bush Impeachment Memo
Newsmax.com ^ | June 3, 2005 | Unknown

Posted on 06/04/2005 9:55:19 AM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit

Failed presidential candidate John Kerry said Thursday that he intends to confront Congress with a document touted by critics of President Bush as evidence that he committed impeachable crimes by falsifying evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

"When I go back [to Washington] on Monday, I am going to raise the issue," Kerry said, referring to the Downing Street Memo in an interview with Massachusetts' Standard Times newspaper.

"I think it's a stunning, unbelievably simple and understandable statement of the truth and a profoundly important document that raises stunning issues here at home," the top Democrat added.

The Downing Street Memo, first reported on May 1 by the London Times, was drafted by a Matthew Rycroft, a foreign policy aide to Prime Minister Tony Blair. It is said to be minutes of a July 2002 meeting where Blair allegedly admitted that the Bush administration "fixed" Iraq intelligence to manufacture a rationale for war.

Citing the Downing Street Memo, former presidential candidate Ralph Nader called for an impeachment investigation on Tuesday in an op-ed piece published by the Boston Globe.

"It is time for Congress to investigate the illegal Iraq war as we move toward the third year of the endless quagmire that many security experts believe jeopardizes US safety by recruiting and training more terrorists," wrote Nader with co-author Kevin Zeese. "A Resolution of Impeachment would be a first step."

The British memo, however, contains no quotes from either Bush or Blair, and is notably slim on evidence implicating Bush in a WMD cover-up.

Though largely ignored in the U.S. outside of rabid anti-Bush Web sites like MichaelMoore.com, the Downing Street Memo won Sen. Kerry's endorsement in the Standard Times interview: "It's amazing to me," the top Democrat said, "the way it escaped major media discussion. It's not being missed on the Internet, I can tell you that."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: britishmemo; deepthroatdodo; democratsarescum; downingstreetmemo; gigolo; hanoijohnny; impeachment; nowmdiniraq; soreloser; totaloser; truehaterofamerica; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-256 next last
To: Fruit of the Spirit


141 posted on 06/04/2005 2:48:31 PM PDT by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
"And, like you said, the RINOS in the Senate are not only NOT backing up Bush, they are starting the whole thing, with Kerry, and Conyers in the HOuse... "

To be fair, it's about 6 to one and a half dosen to the other: the RINOS desperately in need of face time are clamoring to got on TV so they can give their spiels, while the media is filling in the blanks with well...the same type of hype that has always worked with professional sports.

142 posted on 06/04/2005 2:48:45 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: cubram

I don't think the Senators you are referring to are "challenging groupthink"---I just think they are joining the other side's groupthink!


143 posted on 06/04/2005 2:53:31 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

You might be right, but I respect Lindsey Graham, John Warner, Trent Lott, and as unpopular as he may be in this forum, John McCain. I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.


144 posted on 06/04/2005 3:00:17 PM PDT by cubram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: cubram
McCain is unpopular in any forum. He's a Rino that's scared of a mouse. He couldn't push the button on the "Nuke Option" how could he push the button on a real nuke if needed?
145 posted on 06/04/2005 3:04:25 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I can think of several reasons not to like John McCain, but his opposition to the "Nuclear Option" is not one of them. I think it is a short sighted idea, and am glad it has been averted, if only temporarily.


146 posted on 06/04/2005 3:12:42 PM PDT by cubram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: jws3sticks

How very perceptive of you...especially the morph job!
:-)


147 posted on 06/04/2005 3:13:59 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: cubram

I suppose you support never ending debate?


148 posted on 06/04/2005 3:14:06 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Apparently the "Search" engine wasn't working properly, because I did a search and came up empty. Sorry for your indignation.


149 posted on 06/04/2005 3:16:27 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

It's frustrating at times, but what goes around comes around. I can see a day where Dems are in the majority, and the move comes back to bite us in the butt. Also, the obstruction label was/is working, Dems would have thought very hard before voting against a cloture vote.


150 posted on 06/04/2005 3:20:23 PM PDT by cubram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: cubram
The Dems will never again be in the majority. They have no platform except for being the party of no. Zell Miller has known this for years. There is too much at stake with the SC to allow for obstructionist to take over. The people of the US made their decision and put the Republican Party in the majority and the President back in office and now it's time the Rats and Rinos respect the American's wishes. This is not about the right to filibuster, it's the rights of the nominees to get an up or down vote. Filibusters have been a part of the Legislative process for years but not for the advise and consent role of the Senate until the Rats, with the endorsement of the Rinos, allowed it. The nuke option would have brought the Senate back to the "good faith" agreement that has been in effect for years.
151 posted on 06/04/2005 3:33:13 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
LOL!! .. just when you think they couldn't get any more stupider....Surprise .. Surprise .. they prove us wrong....

Yep, they sink to a new low, then start digging!!

152 posted on 06/04/2005 3:38:57 PM PDT by dirtbiker (Solution for Terrorism: Nuke 'em 'till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; cubram

One of the most irritating arguments that the RINOs have used re: the constitutional option, is the one that involves hypothesizing that "some day we will be in the minority, and we wouldn't want them to do that to us"--

Sorry, but that is a LOSER attitude and it has no place in decision making...by using that arguement, McCain and others are "giving" help to the dems, which in turn could turn out to be self-fulfilling fears...

Can you imagine McCAin as president, not wanting to go to war with Afghanistan, because someday they might be mad at us??? sheesh


153 posted on 06/04/2005 3:44:35 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I went to the opening weekend at The Filmore East , Electric Flag was the headliner


154 posted on 06/04/2005 3:45:28 PM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I'm on your side but you put my name next to my adversary.


155 posted on 06/04/2005 3:48:30 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Please forgive me---I forgot to include in my post that I was equating that person with the same kind of rhetoric that MCCain is spewing!!!

Sorry---won't happen again!!! lol


156 posted on 06/04/2005 3:52:51 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
No Problem. I was actually just joking. It may take a couple more elections for these Rinos to figure out the Rats are being exterminated.
157 posted on 06/04/2005 3:55:54 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Last night Alan Colmes said "No mainstream Democrat has talked about impreachment of Pres. Bush". I just sent him this article...

Won't do any good, doesn't have any pictures...Besides, since when does a lib let the facts get in the way of a good story.....

158 posted on 06/04/2005 4:11:21 PM PDT by dirtbiker (Solution for Terrorism: Nuke 'em 'till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

My question is "Where is Jimmah Carter in all of this?"

He has been the GREAT UNDERMINER of Republican Presidents.

Jimmah and Kerry should be hung for treason.

On different days, of course.

I have a lot relatives. I would have to pop a lot of corn.


159 posted on 06/04/2005 4:21:37 PM PDT by slowpipe (" I'll go to school if you want me to, Pa. But I won't take Symbolic Logic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Your adversary? That's news to me! Thought we were having a civil discussion on American politics.


160 posted on 06/04/2005 4:28:03 PM PDT by cubram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson