Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extinct cave bear DNA sequenced
BBC News ^ | Friday, 3 June, 2005, 10:25 GMT | Helen Briggs BBC News science reporter

Posted on 06/04/2005 3:56:12 AM PDT by planetesimal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2005 3:56:13 AM PDT by planetesimal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: planetesimal

why not the mastadon? - frozen examples exist


2 posted on 06/04/2005 4:14:46 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal
But the scientists hope to ... "build" a Neanderthal from their genetic blueprint.

Sigh. As well as being a good read, Michael Crichton's Jurassic Park has a message. It is: Don't do this. Even if you can, don't do this.

God knows what kind of monsters they'll accidentally create. The truly scary ones are probably microscopic and could spread like wildfire killings millions before a means to combat it is figured out. I mean, maybe we'll find out why the Neanderthals went extinct, and maybe we won't like the answer.

3 posted on 06/04/2005 4:23:30 AM PDT by libertylover (Liberal: A blatant liar who likes to spend other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal

I won’t mind if they bring back Ursus Spelaeus, but please leave the Arctodus Simus DNA alone.


4 posted on 06/04/2005 5:03:38 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal

Perhaps someday, God willing,advanced DNA sequencing will allow us to rebuild Michael Jackson's nose.


5 posted on 06/04/2005 5:16:30 AM PDT by Mariposaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

Didn't they just find soft tissue in a dinosaur bone?


6 posted on 06/04/2005 5:37:05 AM PDT by irishtenor (Did I say something wrong? Or just intolerant?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

"Arctodus Simus"

Man, why are people so stingy with graphics sizes?

I couldn't find a single representation that was large enough for me to see well.


7 posted on 06/04/2005 6:14:32 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal

Could cloned Neanderthals vote in US elections? Paging Dr. Dean...


8 posted on 06/04/2005 7:02:55 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
The truly scary ones are probably microscopic and could spread like wildfire killings millions before a means to combat it is figured out. I mean, maybe we'll find out why the Neanderthals went extinct, and maybe we won't like the answer.

Or not.

When will our culture ever get over the 1950's scifi B-movie paranoia?

9 posted on 06/04/2005 7:18:57 AM PDT by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal
 
 
Guys! You know the rules around FR... picures...



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

10 posted on 06/04/2005 7:33:48 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal
If they ever find a well-preserved cave bear (like the Iceman found in the Alps on the Italian/Austrian border a few years ago) they might find some Neanderthal DNA in the bear's stomach.

Prehistoric Europeans seemed to think it was dangerous to say the name for "bear" so they used euphemisms. In English and other Germanic languages the word "bear" originally meant "the brown one," and in the Slavic languages the word for bear meant "the honey eater."

11 posted on 06/04/2005 8:08:06 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariposaman
If that were possible would it mean that he would become,

GULP! A Brown-noser! wakka wakka!

12 posted on 06/04/2005 8:20:06 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

13 posted on 06/04/2005 8:25:50 AM PDT by Porterville (Don't make me go Bushi on your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Man, why are people so stingy with graphics sizes?

Band width?
14 posted on 06/04/2005 11:37:59 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: planetesimal
It is highly unlikely that viable genetic material will ever be recovered from fossils that are hundreds of millions of years old

What about from the soft tissue recently removed from a T-Rex?

15 posted on 06/04/2005 11:41:12 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911

Wooly Mammoths have already been sequenced. In fact, they have been compared to both the Indian and the African elephants gene sequences to determine the "relatedness" of the WM to today's two elephant species.

Care to make a guess as to which is closer to the Mammoth?


jas3


16 posted on 06/04/2005 11:47:01 AM PDT by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsc
http://www.cecalc.ula.ve/bioinformatica/oso/Arctodus_simus.jpg
17 posted on 06/04/2005 11:52:17 AM PDT by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; GSWarrior; Grammy; hispanarepublicana; GreenHornet; Rennes Templar; Yaelle; Dog Gone; ...
I don't know if you guys can bear this on a Saturday, but if you stop cloning around for a few minutes, maybe you could take the time to come out of your caves and reply to this thread to help splice things up around here.

Frankly, I think the work these guys are doing is in-gene-uous, and will help fossil-itate our understanding of our fore-bears. Perhaps they can even give us some insight as to our puncestors. The work they are doing now may be somewhat rudimentary, but it's almost certain to evolve.

18 posted on 06/04/2005 12:00:02 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
your puns are simply unbearable....

" perhaps one day being able to "build" a Neanderthal from their genetic blueprint."

don't bother. I already know a few, and they aren't worth duplicating.

19 posted on 06/04/2005 12:31:42 PM PDT by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack; Squantos; GSWarrior; Grammy; hispanarepublicana; GreenHornet; Rennes Templar; Yaelle; ..

I go with the old wisdom that says we can't have archaic and breed it, too.


20 posted on 06/04/2005 12:45:47 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson