Posted on 06/03/2005 10:46:48 AM PDT by Warhammer
This week, many an unsuspecting American family will travel to Walt Disney World, where they will find themselves at the epicenter of a recurring cultural earthquake. There, at America's favorite family destination, hordes of homosexuals will congregate at Pleasure Island for an annual exercise in societal entropy. "Gay Days at Disney" they call it -- though it is anything but.
"Gay" in the current vernacular is, of course, the term used by the fashionably PC to describe homosexuals. In dictionaries just a couple of decades ago, however, this same adjective meant "happy" or "a state of high spirits." A century ago, the primary definition was: "licentious, lacking moral restraints, leading a debauched or dissolute life." The Gay '90s, for example, were the final decade of what Mark Twain dubbed "The Gilded Age," an era of unmitigated opulence and unrestrained immorality among a subculture of the elite.
In light of this earliest definition, we're reminded of the inimitable words of that great American philosopher, Yogi Berra: "This is like deja vu all over again." Indeed, today's "gay" culture is equally dissolute, and its agenda is anathema to the bedrock institution of our past, present and future -- the American family.
Leading the charge in homosexual advocacy are groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, and their strategy has heretofore been an effective one. The ACLU will select cases in U.S. Circuit Court venues where the Left has installed a majority of judicial activists -- those who do the bidding of constituencies like homosexuals, in effect ignoring the Constitution and legislating by judicial fiat. It is these same judicial activists who affirm such issues as same-sex "marriage" and same-sex partner benefits.
The homosexual legal agenda notwithstanding, the question all enlightened Americans should be asking themselves in order to understand better the moral implications of this agenda is, which definition of "gay" applies to the homosexual subculture in America? In order to answer this question, one must gain some insight into the pathology of homosexual behavior.
The shifting paradigm of sexual morality is a source of much controversy in America. Homosexuals, though less than 3% of the population, are at the center of this controversy. The secular rights of consenting adults are in contest with the timeless natural order of the family and society.
To discuss the issue of homosexual normalization, we must move beyond the "pro-this/anti-that" labels and dispel a false dichotomy -- one that has infected our dialogue on the issue of homosexuality. Homosexual advocacy groups often rebut dissenters by branding them as pharisaical, intolerant and judgmental -- ad hominem accusations which serve only to preclude a consequential discussion of the issue. Of course, one's heartfelt disagreement with the social agenda of homosexual advocates has no direct correlation with one's capacity to love or have compassion for others. Nor is such dissent necessarily related to judgment, which is God's alone. Rather, it is about discerning between right and wrong and obedience to objective truth -- as opposed to conformity with a contemporary code of relativism whose tenets are "tolerance," "diversity" and "inclusion."
From a Judeo-Christian perspective, it should be noted that objective truth does not constitute law without grace. In fact, law in the absence of grace is meaningless -- little more than oppression. However, grace in the absence of law is, likewise, meaningless -- little more than licentiousness. Law and grace are, in fact, different sides of the same coin.
Understanding aberrant sexual behavior is the critical first step toward healing it. Homosexuality is sometimes a promiscuous lifestyle choice. Often, however, as understood by many medical and mental health specialists, gender-disorientation pathology is associated with childhood or adolescent sexual and/or emotional trauma and/or abuse. Additionally, homosexual modeling by an authority figure -- often an influential person with access to the victim through the family, church, school, neighborhood or media -- can result in gender-disorientation pathology.
Homosexual victims often compensate and cover their pain by manifesting some degree of narcissism -- an unmitigated _expression of self-love. They compulsively indulge in aberrant sexual behavior to avoid reconciling the pain of abuse or homosexual modeling.
Additionally, while there was rampant speculation a decade ago about a "homosexual gene," that theory has been repeatedly rejected by both the scientific community and national homosexual advocacy organizations. It should be noted, however, that some children may be genetically predisposed to exhibit masculine or feminine characteristics associated with the opposite sex -- putting them at greater risk of being targeted by homosexual predators and more susceptible, psychologically, to homosexual modeling.
It is no small irony that the most outspoken advocates for the homosexual agenda are equally outspoken about environmental issues -- preservation of the natural order. Even the most humanist of these advocates must acknowledge the obvious -- that homosexuality is a clear and undeniable violation of the laws of nature.
Given insight into the pathology of gender disorientation, to abandon, under the aegis of "love, compassion and inclusion," those who struggle with homosexuality, is tantamount to abandoning a destitute soul in a gutter.
In the final analysis, there is nothing "gay" about being afflicted with gender disorientation pathology. Nor is there anything redeeming about those who would use a family theme park to advance the homosexual agenda.
Gay Days event is from Michael Eisner's rein at CEO of Disney.
If you should happen to find yourself there during this time of year, do NOT, I repeat NOT, go into any Men's restroom wearing a red shirt.
A buddy of mine happened to be there 3 years ago for a conference and discovered that the red shirt is "their signal."
Yeah, he still has the green shirt he bought at Disney that day...
bump and ping
Sharpen your blades Captain Hook, they're coming.........
Their signal? If you wear a red shirt they immediatly insert themselves into your unholiest of places?
I would have bought the green shirt,no matter the cost.
Wonder if they inflate the cost of non-red shirts during gay days?
You HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!! I've never heard of this type of event and I live in one of the queer capitals of N. America.
Im sure the red shirts are very afordable,like 1/2 price.
"...while there was rampant speculation a decade ago about a "homosexual gene," that theory has been repeatedly rejected by both the scientific community and national homosexual advocacy organizations."
The only "Gay Gene" they have discovered is that Episcopal Bishop, Gene Robinson...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
More on "Gay Days" at Disneyland or world or whatever it is. DON'T go and don't take your kids. And personally, I think everything Disney should be avoided, and the company should be informed why you're avoiding it. Their kid movies are junk and filled with homo-feminazi garbage. At least the few I've seen snippets of. They definitely are in the business of promoting some odd stuff.
A friend of mine's brother worked at Disney (graphics) for a while - and said that a huge % were homosexual, and that's why he ultimately quit.
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
"...gender-disorientation pathology is associated with childhood or adolescent sexual and/or emotional trauma and/or abuse. Additionally, homosexual modeling by an authority figure -- often an influential person with access to the victim... -- can result in gender-disorientation pathology. Homosexual victims often compensate ... by manifesting... narcissism... compulsively indulg[ing] in aberrant sexual behavior to avoid reconciling the pain of abuse or homosexual modeling."
This is the core of the disorder. I had the mixed fortune of attending a college with a strong arts program and living in a major urban center for many years. I had many gay/lesbian acquaintances, business associates and friends. The confidences of the friends revealed to me that nearly every one of them had been seriously neglected or abused by parents or orphaned in childhood, or homosexually seduced or raped in childhood, and were then "adopted" by older gay mentors.
"A friend of mine's brother worked at Disney (graphics) for a while - and said that a huge % were homosexual, and that's why he ultimately quit. "
Many with the disorder idealize a childhood that they may wish they had had but did not, for the reasons discussed in my earlier post #16.
There is a blurring of the lines between childhood and adulthood, and a celebration of the childish, fantasy-loving cartoonish self -- a make-believe world in which the self is a protected child. The childlike "gay man" (or lesbian) is safe from the expectations of heterosexual responsibility and mating rituals leading to frightening episodes with opposite sex expectations, pregnancy and the tensions and anxieties typical of heterosexual relationships. The homosexual "inner child" is safe from the actual homosexual exploitation that took place in his/her dimly remembered childhood.
Gay rituals are self-mocking, a ritualistic sexualization of innocence -- behaving like a "naughty" or even a "dirty" child -- one who never leaves the oral/anal stage.
People boycotted Disney because other people boycotted Disney? Am I reading this right? That's the stupidest thing I've heard in a while!
Do want you want, WE will continue to boycott!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.