Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porn sites to get their own Internet domain
Reuters ^ | 6/2/05 | Andy Sullivan

Posted on 06/02/2005 2:35:35 PM PDT by Crackingham

Sex sites will soon be able to sign up for Web addresses in the .xxx Internet domain, but a virtual red light district won't guarantee that people can avoid pornography online, Internet experts said on Thursday. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers said late Wednesday it would move ahead with plans to set up a separate .xxx Internet domain for sexually explicit material. Sex sites won't be required to sign up for .xxx addresses. But the new domain will enable porn sites to label themselves clearly and help filtering software keep underage users away, according to ICM Registry Inc., the company that will oversee the domain.

"This is a voluntary initiative," said Robert Corn-Revere, a Washington lawyer who helped ICM develop its proposal. "We're not trying to put it forward as the ultimate solution for everything."

Child-safety advocate Donna Rice Hughes said .xxx won't help people avoid online porn because sex sites will still be able to hold on to their old .com domain names.

"It's a nice little red-light district for the pornographers, but I don't think it's going to do anything to protect kids," said Hughes, president of the group Enough is Enough. "It's not going to make filters work any better."

A spokeswoman for Playboy Enterprises Inc. said the adult entertainment company had no plans to move any of its Web sites to the new domain.

Pornography accounts for more than 10 percent of online traffic and there are more than 1 million porn Web sites currently online, according to ICM.

Efforts to ban or segregate online pornography have failed for years. The U.S. Congress in 1996 prohibited the "knowing transmission" of obscene or indecent messages to anyone under 18 years old, but the Supreme Court struck that law down a year later on the grounds that it was too broad. A narrower 1998 attempt has never enforced due to a court challenge.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pron; xxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2005 2:35:36 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

easier to block.


2 posted on 06/02/2005 2:36:17 PM PDT by jbstrick (insert clever tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Does this mean porn will be on the Internet in future?


3 posted on 06/02/2005 2:38:45 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (The Right to Buy Weapons is the Right to be Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Pornography accounts for more than 10 percent of online traffic

Slackers!

4 posted on 06/02/2005 2:38:45 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Sex sites won't be required to sign up for .xxx addresses.

Then they wont. Why would they do something that would make it easier to filter them out?

5 posted on 06/02/2005 2:38:47 PM PDT by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I have a techie question, I guess you would call it..from one who is a Tech Luddite assume ythere is a pron site.."sex.com"..you'd think the owners wouldn't what to give it up, and they aren't being forced to..but they would also probably want to register "sex.xxx" can the two sites be the same..parallel, I guess you'd say..with both linking to the same site?


6 posted on 06/02/2005 2:39:10 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool...any volunteers???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

yea, they can route traffic from one domain to another.


7 posted on 06/02/2005 2:40:44 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

and 1/2 of that is transexual porn. Your fave! ;o)


8 posted on 06/02/2005 2:40:44 PM PDT by pissant (forget the darn fish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
the answer is YES.
9 posted on 06/02/2005 2:40:52 PM PDT by Random Nonsense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
easier to block.

It will take the average teenager about 10 seconds to convert the domain name to an IP address.

The only thing the dot-xxx domain will result in is more Internet porn. It is strictly a marketing gimmick.

10 posted on 06/02/2005 2:41:16 PM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog
Pornography accounts for more than 10 percent of online traffic

In the same way that the Navy reports that nuclear submarines can go "faster than 20kts."

11 posted on 06/02/2005 2:43:42 PM PDT by Haru Hara Haruko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Random Nonsense; ruiner
I fugured as much, but it seemed waaay to obvious..and I didn't want to seem stupid..so isn't that what will happen?..in effect, we'll just DOUBLE the number of porn sites?
12 posted on 06/02/2005 2:43:47 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool...any volunteers???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Great.

Now every legitimate company will have to once again buy another license to redurect traffic (especially if it is generic).

Every time they do this they make it worse, not better. Almost no one exclusively uses the ".tv" domain -- there is almost always a corresponding ".com" address (although they ave to be creative sometimes).


13 posted on 06/02/2005 2:46:16 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Of all the idiots I've known in my life, none of them were retarded (W. Earl Brown - "Warren," SAM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

It'll be interesting if they are businesses, and would like to be easily found by those looking for them, or if they are there simple to be a corrosive agent on society. If they choose the later, then they should be hacked badly.


14 posted on 06/02/2005 2:47:02 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yuck.

You're going to owe me a barf bag soon.


15 posted on 06/02/2005 2:47:22 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leapfrog

I signed you up for duty on the other thread!


16 posted on 06/02/2005 2:48:24 PM PDT by pissant (forget the darn fish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Seems to me ICANN has given the porn sites an easy way to avoid further stigmatization.

It would be in the site's best interest to switch to the .xxx designation.

They can forward access requests to their .com address to their .xxx address. This should allow the filters to trap for the .xxx designation.

Pron sites should go ahead and take advantage of this.

17 posted on 06/02/2005 2:54:09 PM PDT by upchuck (If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
It would be in the site's best interest to switch to the .xxx designation.

For some value of "best interest" that includes less traffic? Whatever.

18 posted on 06/02/2005 2:58:05 PM PDT by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Have you heard this idea somewhere before?

Ping


19 posted on 06/02/2005 3:11:49 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (As the Arabic saying has it: The caravan will continue its journey even if the wolves howl along the)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

believe it or not, there are folks in that business who handle their business responsibly.

on a practical side: ease of filtration means fewer complaints to their server host, which in turn reduces the risk of having their sites yanked off the web.


20 posted on 06/02/2005 3:55:52 PM PDT by King Prout (RG'OIHGV 08 YAEGRKoirliha35u9p089 y5gep'iojq5g353hat5eohiahetb98 ye5po)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson