Posted on 06/02/2005 12:51:03 PM PDT by neverdem
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
June 02, 2005, 7:46 a.m. The Left Asks, Will We Ever Win Again? Searching for answers at the "Take Back America" conference
What is the most urgent priority for today's "progressive" movement?
Walk around "Take Back America," the Washington conference put on by the liberal organizing group Campaign for America's Future, and you'll hear lots of answers.
We need media reform.
No, we need election reform.
No, we need a better way to frame our message.
No, we need to stop Wal-Mart.
No...well, the list goes on. But perhaps the number-one concern for progressives, according to one questioner at a press briefing after the conference's opening session, involves a much more basic problem. "We need to stop being so polite," she said. "Liberals are congenitally polite and reasonable and rational." The speaker went on to explain that those traits, while appealing, make it simply impossible for liberals to effectively counter the harshness of right-wing attacks.
To be fair, much of the self-criticism at "Take Back America" was a bit more searching than that. Eli Pariser, head of MoveOn.org's political-action committee, chided Democrats for relying too heavily on rich donors and growing out of touch with ordinary people. (MoveOn raised millions from small contributors on the Internet, to go with the millions donated by George Soros, Peter Lewis, and others.) Pariser became nearly indignant when discussing the votes of some moderate Democrats on Capitol Hill. "No Democrat should have voted for that bankruptcy bill," he said. "Not one!"
Former Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile got in her shots at the Bush administration she referred to it as "Dick Cheney and the rest of those creeps" but also aimed a number of diplomatic criticisms at the politicians in her own party who took part in the recent Senate filibuster compromise. At least a few Democrats, she said, no longer deserved to be in office. "Some of our progressive friends lose their way and forget why they're up on Capitol Hill," Brazile told the audience. "We may have to run you [for office]."
That's the difference a year makes. At the 2004 "Take Back America" conference, held in the midst of a passionately fought campaign, no one was taking public shots, veiled or otherwise, at Democrats. There was just too much at stake to wander off the reservation. But now that campaign is over, and the next one is not quite underway, so the people at the conference can afford to be a little less guarded when talking about their side's problems.
But not totally unguarded. While Pariser and Brazile made a few pointed comments, much of the criticism of Democrats, and of "progressives" in general, heard at the conference was of the "there's nothing wrong with our message, it's just that we haven't communicated it effectively" variety. Indeed, a significant part of the conference's schedule of speakers is devoted to that single seductive idea. Scheduled appearances by Democratic message guru George Lakoff, What's the Matter with Kansas? author Thomas Frank, and right-wing hit-man turned left-wing hit-man David Brock will all deal with the so-called message problem.
Lakoff's panel discussion, a primer for Democrats, is entitled "Talking American."
Another theme of the conference is the belief that the American people are desperately unhappy with George W. Bush and the state of the nation. Democratic pollster Celinda Lake presented the results of focus group studies in which participants were asked to describe their feelings about the condition of the country today. "They used words like 'disappointed,' 'doubtful,' 'concerned,' and 'shitty' in describing their sentiments," Lake said. Perhaps in keeping with that last description, Lake recommended seriously that Democrats adopt political slogans like "It's time to clean out the stables."
Lake also said that her research showed that Democrats should not be afraid to use the "Two Americas" rhetoric that failed to win even the Democratic nomination for former Sen. John Edwards. "Voters are not afraid of a class-based 'Two Americas' message," Lake said. She also recommended that Democrats use the focus-group-tested phrase "family stress relief" to describe their programs. Look for that soon from the Democratic caucus.
Finally, with the campaign pressures off, the organizers of the conference appear to be more willing to publicly address what might be called their diversity problem. As it has been in the past, most nearly all of "Take Back America" attendees are white. Last year, Robert Borosage, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, said that was simply the result of scheduling conflicts, that many potential minority attendees were busy at other events. But this year, after Los Angeles mayor-elect Antonio Villaraigosa told the crowd, "You look at this room today, and you don't see the kind of diversity we need to build a strong movement in America," Borosage openly discussed the conference's rather overwhelming whiteness.
"The obvious shortcoming in the conference is that the diversity of the panels is not reflected in the diversity of the audience," Borosage told a news conference after the opening speeches. Changing that situation will be "the lead project that we undertake next year," Borosage said, promising that the 2006 conference "will look very different" from today's.
Borosage might also have said that in addition to a lack of racial diversity, the conference also featured a large number of attendees who could be described as being of a certain age. In fact, one speaker at the dinner that capped off the conference's first day began his talk by saying, "This is quite a moment for me to see so many men in ties and women in dresses. We must be on some way station between SDS and AARP."
The joke got a brief and not-terribly-enthusiastic laugh; even activists proud of their radical past did not like being so pointedly reminded that they were getting on. But the past made another appearance just a few moments later, when a small wave of nostalgia washed over the room as an organizer for the radical group ACORN, at the dinner to accept the "Paul Wellstone Citizen Leadership Award," began to chant from the stage: THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
At first a few members of the crowd joined in. And then more. And more.
THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
THE PEOPLE UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
Talking American, indeed.
Byron York, NR's White House correspondent, is the author of the new book The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy: The Untold Story of How Democratic Operatives, Eccentric Billionaires, Liberal Activists, and Assorted Celebrities Tried to Bring Down a President and Why They'll Try Even Harder Next Time.
|
|
|
|||
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200506020746.asp
|
Oh yes, lefties, it's because you're such nice people that you have utterly revolted the majority of citizens in this country.
You are so correct in thinking you need to be more hostile and abrasive. History shows that angry, obnoxious left-wingers are proven vote magnets. Yes sir.
(Hee hee.)
Cockiness, pride, and haughtiness goeth before a fall. Even for the GOP. Everyday that GWB allows to go by without securing the border, reigning in gub'ment spending, and enticing domestic job creation, hurts the conservative cause. The security of the homeland issue will not be solely sufficient to ensure that his GOP successor will take the presidential office next time. I pray we (GOP, conservatives,etc.) have learned this lesson, but I'm not seeing much evidence of it so far. If we lose in 2008, we have no one to blame but ourselves. It won't be because the DEM's beat us head to head.
"It's a shame."
I'm not big on conspiracies, but I think one is going on here. I believe the 2 parties need each other. Without corrupt parties with somewhat equal power, an alternative may arise. Possibly even an honest alternative.
I don't think either party wants to render the other party non-viable. So, they do just enough to gain an advantage, and then ease up, or do things that are counter intuitive simply to give the other guys a chance.
I really believe this.
I though "SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPOLLLLLE"!!!???!!!
"You tread on dangerous ground, speaking as such in a room full of cheerleaders"
Yep, and I've posted like this before recently. They can't attack when someone is right. Most of the folks here are reasonable, they know the score. They just don't like to see it pointed out.
I'm just one of those people who likes to make sure the Bush bots know the emperor has no clothes.
Sadly, all those things you mentioned will give a "President Hilary".
The voters aren't being bought off by a smoke screen any more. Fortunately, the Demos have no one in their talent pool, but As the Beast moves rightward (all false of course)it will happen.
-PJ
I bet that "Take back America Conference" was a lot like the hippie fest on that South Park Episode: "Die Hippie Die".
When are these fool going to get a job and fill their meds regularly.
"As the Beast moves rightward (all false of course)it will happen."
Around here there are lots of "old time" democrats. They are the people that are socially conservative, and not all the liberal economically. In reality, their views are more republican than democrat, they just don't know it.
Anyway, many of those people make up the "swing vote". They loved Clinton. Economically, times were good under Clinton. They think their getting Bill if they vote for Hillary.
Don't laugh this off, this is how we'll end up with President Clinton yet again.
Yeah! That's Right! That's their problem. They're just too rational and polite.
Wow! Those must be powerful drugs she's on.
The Left may as well have won. They are controlling the agenda. (With the help of seven Scalawag Republicans.)
I heard a folk singer on a leftie public radio station singing a 'protest' song that contained the phrase "we owe it to the pioneers to take our country back." I laughed. Did this moron mean the 'sexist, oppressive, racist, homophobic, radical Christian, genocidal, envoronment destroying, capitalist, land stealing, militarist' 19th century America that the left has been wailing nonstop about since the 60's? It's as ludicrous as a pinko like Peter Jennings praising "The Greatest Generation". These people never 'had' this country, and have spit on the beliefs, individuals and institutions that brought us from the Industrial Revolution to be the economic and military savior of the free world. Who do they think they're kidding, other than each other?
I think it's time to think about honest alternatives. In any case, a true groundswell of pressure could serve as a reminder to party leadership.
Former Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile got in her shots at the Bush administration she referred to it as "Dick Cheney and the rest of those creeps"
Lake recommended seriously that Democrats adopt political slogans like "It's time to clean out the stables."
Not what Miss Manners would consider congenitally polite.
dude, at least get your info right - Peter Jennings didnt write the greatest generation, it was Brokaw. So if your going to go on a self-abasing rampage, at least get your information straight
Well aren't you just special...looking down on us poor Bushbots from your special pedestal....glad you are around to keep us straight...
I disagree. If there is a God, those who worked long and hard for everything they could find that was antithetical to God's commandments will surely not be resting in peace.
Allegedly, one is answerable before God for one's sins and deliberate acts of wrong doing.
It certainly isn't from lack of opportunity. Darfur, for example - the unilateral solution is disagreeable to "progressives" and the internationalist approach is simply increasing the number of bodies on the ground. So the Democratic solution is...is...well, you see the problem here. As Bush is president it is easy to declare anything he does as wrong - were Clinton president the Democrat solution would be either to declare genocide the new standard or to ignore it completely in the name of "peace." No ideas there, just positioning, and spin, and their new buzzword "framing." But no new ideas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.