Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You think FR's rules are strict... ;-)
Reviving Islam ^

Posted on 06/01/2005 10:34:00 PM PDT by Sir Gawain

Yes these are the real rules:

By posting on or viewing the RevivingIslam.com Board you agree to abide by the following:

 

Number 1: There is to be no support of the Kuffar or kufr.

Number 2: No incredibly abhorrent foul language (note: that if it is towards a tawghoot or Ahlul-Bida'ah, then there will definitely be leniency.) Foul language is defined by the 'Urf (culture/custom) of the one speaking. This will definitely be taken into account by the Admins and Moderators.

Number 3: No making claims without Proof. We have a no tolerance stance on making claims without authentic proof. If you speak about Islaam, you must have burhaan (evidences, proofs etc.). The first 2 offenses will be warnings. The last, Banned eternally.

Number 4: Everything on RevivingIslam.com stays on RevivingIslam.com. If you spy on any Muslim within our forums, and we find out, we will be ban you. Also, all material posted stays on the forums, except proofs for stances etc. The statements of the members, moderators, or Admins are not allowed to be posted on other sites. To do so requires permission by the Moderators or Admins. We will also take the proper means to implement the law of "an eye for an eye" if this board rule is broken.

Number 5: No Pictures in your Signatures. The reason is because it takes to much space, and uses to much of others' bandwidth.

Number 6: There are to be absolutely no posting of deviant websites through the forums. You will be warned for the first offense. The second offense will result in posting being disabled. Deviants include crack-head sufi sites, madkhali sites, shi'aa sites etc. If there is an article you want to quote from a deviant site, there is to be no referencing.

Number 7: There is to be no instant messaging of the opposite gender, unless permission from that person is given. RevivingIslam.com staff have a  NO TOLERANCE policy regarding such acts.

Number 8: There is to be no flirtatious character between the genders (and definitely no faggot activity). If you are a faggot, we will ban you. If you are being flirtatious with the opposite gender, you will be warned, and then proper action will be taken.

Number 9: There are to be no pictures of women uploaded or linked on the site, even if it be through avatar. If a woman is on the avatar, she must be completely covered.

Number 10: By being on the RevivingIslam.com forums, you are part of the RI family. Remember to treat each other respectfully. Remember that not everyone is at "your level" in knowledge or character. Advice should be given in private, so as not to humiliate a person.

Number 11: By being a member of RI, you agree that you will only have yourself use your account. No other person may use your account whatsoever. If it is found out that you allowed others to use your account, we will ban you.

Number 12: Opinions expressed on this board are those of individual users unless it’s mentioned as a board policy. The owner or the management of RevivingIslam.com could not be held accountable for the opinions expressed by members of the forum.

Number 13: No user should join the board to spy on Muslims. If you have such an intention or find objectionable material on the board, please leave the board immediately and ask your account to be removed.

 


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: cary; dhimmi; morefunthantrollindu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: Howlin

The phrase "Banned Eternally" gives me the creeps. Some poor 13-year-old tawghoot (troll?) smiles because he's been eternally banned, only to hear his front door break down.


41 posted on 06/01/2005 11:00:05 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

I would really like to know why he was banned.


42 posted on 06/01/2005 11:03:27 PM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

What thread are we talking about?


43 posted on 06/01/2005 11:06:18 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

bttt


44 posted on 06/01/2005 11:06:46 PM PDT by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

Never mind, I saw and posted to that thread earlier. Didn't see anything banworthy.


45 posted on 06/01/2005 11:07:32 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Lol! "no faggots"! I love it!


46 posted on 06/01/2005 11:07:37 PM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Wow! Rule Number 9 will make their Ann Coulter threads very boring.

-PJ

47 posted on 06/01/2005 11:07:39 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Let's post a few links to The Joy of Pigs over there - just to see what happens.

If that flies, Stop #2 on our FReeper Journey of Adventure will be here.

48 posted on 06/01/2005 11:07:44 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

sounds like a Klingon term


49 posted on 06/01/2005 11:11:53 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: warcraft2man; brigette; eastforker
They just suspended maineman

It took me a little while to figure out what you were talking about. That is odd. There are no deleted comments on the thread.

50 posted on 06/01/2005 11:13:31 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Or the Bush Twin threads. I made the mistake of posting this without pictures (see post #20):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1411779/posts


51 posted on 06/01/2005 11:16:09 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

52 posted on 06/01/2005 11:16:45 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I know of a Jain site that makes all of those logging and and posting to each other be in the nude. This is according to ancient divine Jain doctrines. Also the keyboards of each JainRepublic.com user must be swept by Jain priest assistants before each post by the user.

Wacky people those Jains !

P.S. I don't know who their admin moderators are, or who their web cam auditors are, but I'm glad I'm not one of them.
53 posted on 06/01/2005 11:17:29 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Actually, many couples all around the world start the day with A pork.


54 posted on 06/01/2005 11:18:56 PM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

I tried joining their message boards to break their rules, namely the "no spying" rule. talk about paranoid, you have to be "vouched for" by two members of the message board before you're allowed to read or post on their message boards. Since I knew there would be no chance in hell that I'd be allowed on, I posted my new email address (mohamedwasacriminal@yahoo.com) and asked politely for any of them to contact me for some intelligent and thoughtful debate on their practices, i was banned within ten minutes.
After my banning, I decided I'd go for it again, this time I went for a new moniker (islamofascist, you'd think they'd like me just by the name). Again I was banned within minutes - these mods are on top of things at RevivingIslam.com. I tried yet again (IslamofascistV2_0), posted my email address and stil no one took the bait, nor did they allow me to post, and then banned me.
I made several more attempts, but had no luck. I did get a great screen shot with the member name "MohamedWasACriminal" scrolling across the bottom of their website. In all, i wasted about 2 hours of my life pissing off the mods of their site just to get a funny screenshot.
BTW I heard about this on Jihadwatch.org the other day; I love Robert Spencer he's my Idol.


55 posted on 06/01/2005 11:19:06 PM PDT by Nipplemancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Wanted: good woman, must be virgin, must cook, clean and raise many children. Must have sheep and/or goats. Send pic of sheep/goats.


56 posted on 06/01/2005 11:22:00 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nipplemancer

So how about the screenshot? Share the love brother!!!


57 posted on 06/01/2005 11:22:29 PM PDT by hatfieldmccoy (Satan has a new name and it is Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: scott7278

He is back, JR just restored him, it was a time out from the AM, he posted his ufo thread in breaking.


58 posted on 06/01/2005 11:36:05 PM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

That would probably do it.


59 posted on 06/01/2005 11:43:31 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
What the hell is a "tawghoot"?

Didn't a Klingon call Jean Luc Picard that once?

60 posted on 06/01/2005 11:45:32 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson