Skip to comments.
Left-wing misogyny is alive and well
The Times (U.K.) ^
| 06/02/05
| Cristina Odone
Posted on 06/01/2005 2:45:57 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Nihao
"...The man doesn't mind letting them sit in the sink and age a bit, either..." Nor does he mind sitting the hard to clean pots and pans on the porch and letting the dog pre-clean them.....
41
posted on
06/02/2005 8:04:54 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(Excrementum Occurum)
To: OB1kNOb
You know, Feminism is crazy...and I am saying this as a woman. This is certainly not the way to equality. Realistically, any one person, male or female, needs to prove that they deserve the chair that they so blatantly desire. Hard work and a built up reputation provides that seat. Worry about yourself and no one else. Above all, respect is earned, and being late is not the way to this reward!! (As to my earlier comments on men now cooking...my spouse can cook a mean dinner...with little mess.He just doesn't like to cuz he works hard all day. JUST LIKE ME)
:?
42
posted on
06/02/2005 8:34:45 AM PDT
by
petpeeve
To: petpeeve
Correct. Correct. And correct.
43
posted on
06/02/2005 10:01:38 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(Excrementum Occurum)
To: Nihao
I hate to say it, but this lady doesn't get much sympathy from me. She wants "equality" and "chivalry", which is a contradiction in terms.Chivalry is one thing. Common courtesy is another. A woman who is in advanced pregnancy ought to be yielded some physical preference in seating, etc.
44
posted on
06/02/2005 7:08:20 PM PDT
by
RonF
To: ahayes
I think the test is whether they'd give a seat to an obviously ill man. If not, then they're just plain rude to everyone. I always give my seat to the elderly or infirm. A pregnant lady would qualify. I might not be civilized but I have manners.
45
posted on
06/02/2005 7:12:42 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(I am not a romantic, I don't hero worship and no, as a matter of fact, I don't have a heart.)
To: Pokey78
The catalogue of Mr Clintons conquests is well known, the crassness of his come-ons much reported. Yet until now no one had asked why it was that when Judge Clarence Thomas allegedly made his remarks about oral sex to a fellow lawyer, Anita Hill, feminist critics went for the jugular, while the former President, despite repeated allegations of far more serious sexual misconduct, went unchallenged by them. LOL The feminists were all panting for Clinton themselves actually, and were dying for the Presidential Kneepads.
To: Pokey78
I wouldn't give her my seat either.
47
posted on
06/02/2005 7:18:16 PM PDT
by
HitmanLV
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: Billthedrill
pure evil...
heh heh...
I REALLY like that.
49
posted on
06/03/2005 12:47:32 AM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(Please don't squeeze the Koran. I gotta go to the bathroom.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson