Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Separation of church and state" is written in the Soviet constitution

not

the US constitution...

The US Constitution has written, "

Congress

shall make no law..."

not

"The Indiana State Legislature shall make no law..."

The goal of phony "civil liberties" groups like ICLU is to remove anything Christian from public property, while simultaneously eroding private property rights so that everything is "public." Then there will be no place for anything Christian, including your own body, since that will also be a property of the state.
1 posted on 06/01/2005 10:09:57 AM PDT by w6ai5q37b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: w6ai5q37b

This sort of thing boils my blood. It should with conservative Americans that value their Christianity. I can't see how we can just sit back and now raise some h*** over this. I'm tired of it.


2 posted on 06/01/2005 10:12:42 AM PDT by FeeinTennessee (Visit me @ peoplepolitical.org --Fee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w6ai5q37b

A prayer isn't a law. Whatever happen to free speech and free exercise and all of that?


4 posted on 06/01/2005 10:21:29 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w6ai5q37b

The idea that the Constitution states that there is a "separation of church and state" is an fraudulent idea foisted on an unconscious and uneducated American public in the 40s by the parent ACLU. ACLU has been tearing the foundation of our country ever since. This must be stopped. First and foremost, the Constitution does NOT say anything about "separation of church and state". People must understand this.


6 posted on 06/01/2005 10:24:24 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w6ai5q37b
Congress shall make no law establishing or restricting the free excercise of....

Wouldn't banning them from praying or any reference to Jesus be, a law restricting their constituional right to express religion?

I know I shouldn't expect them to be able interpret the Constitution, they're lawyers.

7 posted on 06/01/2005 10:26:32 AM PDT by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w6ai5q37b

Exactly how can you have "prayer in the Judeo-Christian tradition" without being able to mention the Christian part of it?


8 posted on 06/01/2005 1:18:21 PM PDT by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: w6ai5q37b

Too bad there aren't any conservative lawfirms who go after groups like this as well to bankrupt them.


10 posted on 06/01/2005 3:12:47 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Rep. John Hostettler, R-Ind., filed a measure to amend the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Section 1988, to prohibit prevailing parties from being awarded attorneys fee in religious establishment cases, but not in other civil rights filings. If you want to corral the ACLU, then consider a letter or email to your Congressman urging them to cosponsor this legislation.

More details here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1413875/posts

11 posted on 06/01/2005 4:43:25 PM PDT by ViLaLuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson