Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today: Couric Proclaims Mark Felt "Did the Right Thing;" Buchanan Reveals He'd Leaked Before
The Today Show | governsleast governsbest

Posted on 06/01/2005 4:40:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
My guess is that the money angle for the avaricious family of Felt is the driving engine for this old news revelation, but there is an interesting and timely little coincidence.

There are two current semi-announcees in the '06 senate race against Her Heinous, a woman with Ferraro type husband problems and the son-in-law of Richard Nixon.

Being one of the "heroes" of Watergate, Her Heinous "saved" us from the original Nixon...

121 posted on 06/01/2005 6:55:37 AM PDT by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
Final approach..

You nailed that approach 29er!
I was formulating a response about Linda Tripp, poor gal.
Good citizen who thought she was doing the right thing and had the guts to go public.. I think Liddy's got the right slant on this..
anyway you did it for me, thanks
122 posted on 06/01/2005 6:59:15 AM PDT by late bloomer ( Neglegere homo pone aulaeum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Katie= "Little Susie Shallow Throat".

Courtesy of DAC.


123 posted on 06/01/2005 7:13:57 AM PDT by LongsforReagan (I hate Howard Dean and everything he stands for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
saw G. Gordon Liddy on the Matthews show last night, and he stated that Nixon didn't order the Watergate operation, that it was John Dean who did so, and that Nixon went down defending something he was not responsible for

IIRC Liddy subscribes to the theory that Dean ordered the Watergate burglary NOT to gather info on the DNC, but to find documents related to an alleged call-girl ring being operated out of the DNC's office in the Watergate.

Dean's new little wifey, Maureen (whose chic appearance was featured adoringly by the MSM at the time), was allegedly either an operator of the call-girl ring, or one of the call girls.

I think the theory is that Dean was trying to seize the evidence in order to protect her from being exposed. Or something like that.

Also IIRC, Liddy was sued for libel by John and Maureen Dean for espousing this theory. Liddy won.

link to photo of John and Maureen Dean at their wedding --note wedding guest on the right, the notorious playboy Barry Goldwater Jr.

124 posted on 06/01/2005 7:22:26 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (The 'right to choose' = The right to choose death --for somebody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Ping me when Katie deep throats on camera in order to boost the ratings..


125 posted on 06/01/2005 7:30:15 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool...any volunteers???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Yes, and the FNF idiots stepped all over everything that Liddy was trying to say.

I can't believe FNF hasn't been replaced by an adult show before now.

126 posted on 06/01/2005 7:36:22 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
Just catching the Today show opening here in Chicago...Katy opens saying that she's so excited to find out about Deep Throat, we've all been wondering for so many years...

I think one of my old fart buddies nailed it over a couple a beers last night.

No one under 50 gives a sh!t about any of this.

127 posted on 06/01/2005 7:42:16 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Ping me when Katie deep throats on camera in order to boost the ratings..

Is she till gettin residuals for the deep colon show?

128 posted on 06/01/2005 7:46:56 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Someone ought to clue the Old Mediots in about the results of the overblown Watergate affair:

-A presidency was brought down by indirect effects simply because the president was perhaps overly loyal to his people.
-The United States was weakened.
-The worst and weakest president of the 20th century was installed - emboldening our enemies.
-The Shah of Iran was overthrown instead of the US being able to bolster up a voice of moderation and modernity in the MidEast - and much of the world's terrorism was strengthened as a result
- and OPEC stretched its muscles - and the US was not strong enough to effectively respond (I categorically don't mean militarity).
-Reagan was the inevitable reaction to the worst president, but by that time irreversible damage had been done.
-The Old Media FRAUDcasters have since been trying to bring down presidents, and even found themselves forced, finally, into joining the New Media to some extent against Bill Clinton.
-Journalism's "highest calling" has become trying to bring shame on politicians - with the gold prizes for R-politicians - instead of reporting news that really affects the country and the world.

(Others have made these comments far more effectively than my poor attempt here, and I would appreciate a ping to better enumerations.) We're still in the process of attempting to recover from Watergate.

Couric's cute comment "wasn't watergate bad" burns me and anybody who cares about this country.


129 posted on 06/01/2005 7:53:46 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

"Why would the WP confirm the "source" having committed to secrecy until the geezer croaks? The WP could have denied comment and make the family prove their case but they didn't."


Why would a LIBERAL, Nixon-hating newspaper deny comment and make the family "prove" their case...but they didn't? Well, DUH...I couldn't guess! Meanwhile, I heard on talk radio this morning that the "story" could prove to be a best-seller (worth well over a million) for the family.


130 posted on 06/01/2005 7:59:51 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: smiley
Good morning.

The family did look like they had just won the lottery, didn't they.

Michael Frazier
131 posted on 06/01/2005 8:02:58 AM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

And you know why the media tries to do that to "R" presidents? Not ideology - - but lots and lots of potential money and fame! Look at Woodward and Bernstein.

Every hack reporter wants some of what they got....getting the story right "be damned"......


132 posted on 06/01/2005 8:05:29 AM PDT by duckbutt ( If you let a smile be your umbrella, then most likely your butt will get soaking wet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: libbybelle
Nixon's mistake was that in trying to protect his friends he obstructed justice.

Nixon was a perfect example of the Peter Principle.

He'd have never found himself in the Whitehouse had he not been Ike's Veep.

He was an accident of history, much like the Bush dynasty.

133 posted on 06/01/2005 8:06:18 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
Nixon's major crime was loyalty to his friends.

As a result, he helped to cover up an investigation into wrongdoing.

He was threatened with impeachment by the large-majority Democrats after much hounding by the Old Media. Representatives of his party, Republicans, took a walk from the Capitol to the WH to ask in a private conversation that he resign. Nixon further showed his loyalty to his friends and his country by doing resigning, instead of forcing the party and country to split in a trial over this, though he never believed his actions were wrong. In fact he believed that the state of war gave the executive branch the right to do what his subordinates did, though he never specifically authorized their ill-fated actions, and cited WW2 precedents.


An unbiased history of Watergate would include what I wrote above. Your dad is right (as usual... I suspect)
134 posted on 06/01/2005 8:08:39 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Don't get too comfortable about your "glad he did"... when you get more into this story, and realize all the damage that was done to the country due to the trivial incident known as Watergate, you may find yourself wishing you hadn't been so duped by the Old Media FRAUDcasters.


135 posted on 06/01/2005 8:13:28 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Do you recall in which tabloid the photo appeared?

I saw it at the market.

I think it was National Enquirer.

136 posted on 06/01/2005 8:16:36 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast

Thanks - I'll see if I can find it online.


137 posted on 06/01/2005 8:17:46 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

While you're at it, you probably note that a greater percentage of R's voted for the Civil Right's agenda and the rest of LBJ's Great Society than did D's.

Goldwater was a voice crying in the wilderness for conservatism. Watergate killed that wing of the R's - and opened up the opportunity for the present (more) Conservative movement.

We did pay a very high price, though, for it greatly weakened the US.


138 posted on 06/01/2005 8:21:41 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

If Watergate is the standard for crimes, and Colson went to jail (1-3yrs) for revealing ONE FBI file, MF should have been put away for life. The crimes MF committed, and was pardoned by Reagan for, were easily more numerous and far reaching than anything Nixon did, or Colson, or Liddy.

The only person who may have been remotely as culpable is Dean - who skated.


139 posted on 06/01/2005 8:30:17 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Ryan Bailey
Good morning.

" We'd still be in Vietnam ( a democrat war if ever there was one, as Sen. Dole rightly commented ) if not for Richard Nixon."

I disagree. I believe that Nixon would have not allowed the final offensive to succeed, probably by using massive air power to inflict massive casualties. Three failed communist offensives would have given South Vietnam time to grow sharp enough teeth to defend itself.

For years I have blamed Trickey Dick for getting himself pushed out of office which gave the DemocRATS the ability to betray South Vietnam.

This thread has made me reconsider where to lay the blame. Clearly a coup took place.

Michael Frazier
140 posted on 06/01/2005 8:33:26 AM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson