Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Dakota flood project spurs US-Canada dispute
Reuters ^ | 05/30/05 | Roberta Rampton

Posted on 05/30/2005 6:27:07 AM PDT by nypokerface

DEVILS LAKE, North Dakota (Reuters) - Joe Belford points out the weathered stumps of half-submerged dead oaks, all that remain of a neighborhood of 40 homes engulfed by 12 years of flooding in this part of northwestern North Dakota.

As Belford drives down roads rebuilt two and three times due to flood damage, the Ramsey County commissioner notes dozens of anglers casting for trophy walleye fish on some of the 90,000 acres of land that have been covered by Devils Lake as it has tripled in size during the years of wet weather.

North Dakota says it has a solution to the lake's spread and wants to divert water ultimately to a river in Canada. But that $25 million plan has caused an uproar across the border, where Canadian politicians worry the water will bring pollution that will harm a valuable fishery.

North Dakota has built a system -- set to go into operation on July 1 -- of pumps, pipes and canals to take water from land-locked Devils Lake to the nearby Sheyenne River with the goal of stabilizing the lake at current levels.

The Sheyenne will carry the water south to the Red River near Fargo, North Dakota, joining the Red as it courses north up the Minnesota state line and then over the Canadian border.

In Canada, the Red drains into Manitoba's Lake Winnipeg, the world's 10th largest freshwater lake. Canadian politicians have been scrambling to stop the plan because they believe the water will threaten Lake Winnipeg's commercial fishery, worth C$25 million ($20 million) a year.

Although its water quality has not been extensively studied, critics say landlocked Devils Lake has especially high concentrations of pollutants because runoff from farms and populated areas accumulates there.

But Belford, the North Dakota county official, said the area's excellent fishing was proof Canadians are overreacting.

"If (the lake) had all of the bad things that (Canadians) say were in it, people wouldn't want to come here" to fish, he said.

REPERCUSSIONS FOR CANADA

But across the border about 280 miles northeast of Devils Lake, fisherman Bruce Benson fumes about the project as he untangles his nets in preparation for the 100-day fishing season on Lake Winnipeg.

"We've got enough problems on the lake," said Benson, a fourth-generation fisherman and one of about 1,000 who make a living catching pickerel -- what Americans call walleye -- and other species.

Each season, he must replace at least one net because it gets so gummed up with algae that it can no longer be used. The algae -- whose growth is spurred by phosphorus in fertilizers carried by groundwater draining into the lake -- kills fish.

About 6,600 tonnes of phosphorus a year from fertilizer used on farms and city lawns across the Canadian prairies, North Dakota and Minnesota ends up in Lake Winnipeg.

The Manitoba government estimates the Devils Lake outlet could dump another 20 tonnes of phosphorus into Lake Winnipeg each year, along with salts, other pollutants, foreign fish and parasites.

The Americans "don't understand the repercussions of some of their actions," Benson said.

What bothers Benson most is North Dakota's refusal to have its project reviewed by the International Joint Commission, an independent binational agency set up to resolve cross-border water disputes.

But North Dakotans say the commission could take years to do its work, and they can't afford to wait.

By the end of 2004, state and federal governments had spent $400 million moving 500 homes and buildings and repairing roads and bridges as the lake swelled to 136,000 acres, more than three times its 1993 size.

Belford said he fears the wet weather, which has raised the lake's water levels by 26 feet (8 m) since 1993, could continue, forcing more people to move and ruin more farmland.

North Dakota started building its $25 million outlet in late 2003 after balking at a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposal that was more than seven times the cost, said state water engineer Dale Frink.

But Frink said the Army Corps' environmental studies showed an outlet would be safe.

The state health department agreed, giving the project a permit to send a small amount of water through the outlet as long as monitoring sites along the rivers show it does not hurt water quality.

"I don't think there's ever been in North Dakota any project that will be monitored as closely as the Devils Lake outlet," Frink said.

The volume of water may be small, but its quality is poor, and scientists disagree on whether the outlet could degrade Lake Winnipeg, said Dwight Williamson, a Manitoba water official.

So Canada, backed by Minnesota and other states, provinces, environmental groups and Indian leaders, asked last April for a year-long expedited review by the International Joint Commission.

"If North Dakota is, in fact, confident in its science on Devils Lake, they really have nothing to fear," Williamson said.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice must approve such a review. She has not yet addressed the issue, and North Dakota is not obligated to wait for Rice before running its outlet.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: environment; water

1 posted on 05/30/2005 6:27:07 AM PDT by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

...."catching pickerel -- what Americans call walleye "....

two totally different fish.
I'd guess Roberta Rampton of Reuters isn't an avid fisherman.


2 posted on 05/30/2005 7:12:38 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

Ping.


3 posted on 05/30/2005 7:27:43 AM PDT by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Send a troop of Boy Scouts to invade and seize Canada. Have done with those Canucks.

Bunch of nattering old women.

4 posted on 05/30/2005 7:34:11 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

List of Ping lists

5 posted on 05/30/2005 8:21:39 AM PDT by farmfriend (Down with the sickness -Disturbed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


6 posted on 05/30/2005 8:52:13 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Abram; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; blackeagle; BroncosFan; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
7 posted on 05/30/2005 10:11:30 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

Send the water to Mexico if it's polluted. I'm sure it's better than theirs 'cause they pee in their creeks!


8 posted on 05/30/2005 10:57:45 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, it's a FREE CALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Guess we need to listen to the "wise" Canadians again.


9 posted on 05/30/2005 3:14:26 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (<-- sick of faux-conservatives who want federal government intervention for 'conservative things.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gdc61

WHAT? A journalist who doesn't know what the hell she/he/it's talking about?

Say it isn't so!!!!!


10 posted on 05/31/2005 4:45:00 AM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Levante

LOL! I'll bet some kanuk fisherman told her that just to make her sound stupid.


11 posted on 05/31/2005 5:38:37 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gdc61

Pickerel


Walleye

12 posted on 05/31/2005 5:47:35 AM PDT by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mollynme

nice catch! ;)


13 posted on 05/31/2005 6:25:32 AM PDT by gdc61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

I wonder if it's possible to ship this water out west. They are always short on water in Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Cali etc..

Perhaps because of government interference in water management there is not a market for it. Boo hoo.


14 posted on 05/31/2005 2:05:47 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/charterschoolsexplained.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

the red river is not a pristine waterway or worthy to eat edible fish. send it north. its ok


15 posted on 06/07/2005 5:34:25 PM PDT by Twist_T (it is never to late to make a difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson