Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's My Party Too supporters
It's My Party Too website ^ | 5-29-2005 | web site information

Posted on 05/29/2005 11:31:38 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver

About Us:

Our vision is a Republican Party that is unified by the basic tenets of fiscal responsibility and personal freedom, but that allows for diverse opinions on social issues by its members.

IMP-PAC is chaired by Christie Todd Whitman, a lifelong and loyal Republican and a leader of the party’s moderate wing, who served in the Bush cabinet as the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from January 2001 to May 2003. Prior to that, she was the first female elected governor of New Jersey, serving two terms from 1993 to 2000.

Advisory Board:

Congressman Mike Castle (R-DE)

Susan Cullman

The Honorable Robert J. Dole

Lewis M. Eisenberg

David Eisenhower

Julie Nixon Eisenhower

President Gerald R. Ford

The Honorable Michael Huffington

Honorable Nancy Kassebaum Baker

Congressman Jim Kolbe (R-AZ)

The Honorable Amo Houghton

The Honorable John McCain

The Honorable William G. Milliken

Congressman Rob Simmons (R-CT)

The Honorable Alan Simpson

Candace L. Straight

The Honorable William Weld


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigtent; christiewhitman; ctwisafrigginidiot; divorce; elite; feminists; gop; itsmypartytoo; losertarians; moderaterepublicans; rino; rnc; whitman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
We need to remember who these supporters are. Moderate, or centrist, versus the conservatives in the GOP.
1 posted on 05/29/2005 11:31:38 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

we also need to remember that neither the conservative nor the liberal bases are enough to win an election on a national scale. There has to be some moderate appeal or else you get 35% and an @$$-whuppin....


2 posted on 05/29/2005 11:33:10 AM PDT by MikefromOhio ( 1,000,000 Iraqi Dinar = 708.617 US Dollar - Get yours today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Traditionally, you're exactly right. But I believe things are changing - due to new media.

Also, we are in the failed-liberal stage of the 30-year cycle (by analogy, it's 1975 and Bush represents Ford or Nixon). That means we have about 5 more years of desperate times, to be followed by a decade of Reagan-like conservatism. Or so the theory says.


3 posted on 05/29/2005 11:39:14 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

yeah but does that mean Hillary would win in 08?


4 posted on 05/29/2005 11:40:38 AM PDT by MikefromOhio ( 1,000,000 Iraqi Dinar = 708.617 US Dollar - Get yours today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
Whitman made her bones in the pro-abortion movement, heading a little outfit called (I believe) "Republicans for choice. As NJ Gov.(I recall) she declared a state day to commemorate Roe v. Wade. She, and most of her boosters are your basic East Coast Country Club Rockefeller Republicans. The fact that they call themselves
"moderates" shows how far our language has been debased, and our values corrupted.
5 posted on 05/29/2005 11:40:43 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

It depends what you're conservative about. Abortion yes I am pretty conservative, but not on contraception. Censorship of pornography or language, no way...censor yourself or your own kids. Gay marriage...too much of a waste of good political energy (more for civil unions, but it's not going to affect striaght marriages). Stem cell research...very tricky ground specially in the desire to make the uber mensch...have to be careful here. I feel more comfortable in big tent conservatism...actually I'd be a libertarian if it were a more viable party. I have voted for libertarian candidates in the past.


6 posted on 05/29/2005 11:47:18 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (Zarqawi sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

christie todd whitman is nobody.

spending money on this pac is just an effort by the left to try and make the parties "generic" again.

Perhaps she should become a democrat and do the same "its my party BS."


7 posted on 05/29/2005 11:52:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

These people should do what Theresa Heinz did. They do not have to change ANY of their views; just admit your party left you and become a Democrat.


8 posted on 05/29/2005 11:56:37 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave
We're pretty much in agreement, Dave. I don't support censorship at all. I don't believe there is anything wrong with contraception (as long as abortion is not defined as "contraception"). I don't support gay marriage, but have a hard time understanding how the government can deny it.

On the flip side, never met a tax that I like. I truly believe that our national defense should receive the highest share of budget money (I can be a bit hawkish too). And I am a FIRM believer in capital punishment!

9 posted on 05/29/2005 11:57:55 AM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
"spending money on this pac is just an effort by the left to try and make the parties 'generic' again."

George Soros owns the Democrats and brags about it. He contributes to these Republicans because he wants to own both parties outright. If those pesky conservatives would just go away and stop causing problems, he could own the country (and brag about it.)

10 posted on 05/29/2005 12:01:43 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
How big is the Republican tent? Abe Lincoln gave us a clue on July 10, 1858 when he said:

We have besides these men descended by blood from our ancestors-among us perhaps half our people who are not descendants at all of these men, they are men who have come from Europe German, Irish,. French and Scandinavian men…if they look back through this history to trace their connection with those days by blood, they find they have none,…but when they look through that old Declaration of Independence they find that those old men say that We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, [that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE]and then they feel that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relation to those men, that it is the father of all moral principle in them, and that they have a right to claim it as through they were blood of blood, and flesh of the flesh of the men who wrote that Declaration, and so they are. That is the electric cord in that Declaration that links the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving men together, that will link those patriotic hearts as long as the love of freedom exists in the minds of men throughout the world.

If you can't abide, join the culture of death, the democrat party.

11 posted on 05/29/2005 12:05:32 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
Hillary will win unless two things happen.

1. Evangelicals are not marginalized over the next 3.5 years; the Republicans cater enough to this very important segment of their base that they again turn out. More pro-life policies, conservative judges, etc. Placate enough for acceptance of 2.

2. Republicans nominate a pro-life "moderate" to retain the Dem temptables. Wide appeal, but has to be acceptable to base (ie not McCain, nor probably Guiliani since he is pro-gay and isn't pro-life).

Does it look like Bush is going to satisfy 1? And who among the potentials for 2008 fit 2? Four years of Hillary will be nasty, and I hate to say it but she looks set to take the mushies in the middle. I want at least ONE good government in North America! Just my take...
12 posted on 05/29/2005 12:06:00 PM PDT by Atheist_Canadian_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
Our vision is a Republican Party that is unified by the basic tenets of fiscal responsibility and personal freedom, but that allows for diverse opinions on social issues by its members.

The first two tenets seem straight-forward. The third is as vague as it can be. If one declares their principles with the implied proviso that they may abandon some of them at any time if they are not consistent with another vaguely stated belief, can one claim to be a principled person?

13 posted on 05/29/2005 12:07:05 PM PDT by eskimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atheist_Canadian_Conservative

I would think Allen with Rice could do it....

maybe a couple others, but it is going to be an interesting race...


14 posted on 05/29/2005 12:08:33 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ( 1,000,000 Iraqi Dinar = 708.617 US Dollar - Get yours today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: penowa

I remember hearing about a movement by in the 1910's or 20' where the elites set about contributing and manipulating both parties so that is would NEVER MATTER which party won. (I think it was michael reagan or another radio show host. Liddy?)

They did not want to have to worry about which party won or whether voting by the populace in general would matter.

I see these RINOs as a movement to foster irrelivancy.


15 posted on 05/29/2005 12:13:44 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

A few of the sheeple have one eye open and that is enough to cause the elite a few sleepless nights.


16 posted on 05/29/2005 12:20:11 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eskimo

Perhaps this is an effort for the powerless Rino's to get money from soros and co.


17 posted on 05/29/2005 12:20:36 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I'm thinking of just using your post as my explanation of my own beliefs! Though we differ in one area--I'm getting a little soft on the capital punishment thing. I agree with it when we're taking out those who we know for a dead (pun intended) certainty did the crime, but I'm also pretty leery of taking the government's word for it. On the other hand, if we quit making the prisons an "alternative living" area, I'd be all for leaving them in there to rot indefinitely.


18 posted on 05/29/2005 12:21:35 PM PDT by SoVaDPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

"we also need to remember that neither the conservative nor the liberal bases are enough to win an election on a national scale. There has to be some moderate appeal or else you get 35% and an @$$-whuppin...."

Absolutely correct. Us despised moderates are just as important. The choice is clear. Big tent or no tent.


19 posted on 05/29/2005 12:26:13 PM PDT by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
The problem that faces conservatives is that we need moderates, but we cannot count on them.
20 posted on 05/29/2005 12:28:08 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson