Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin

That's why having a base of consumption rather than income as the tax base used for S/Ss would be preferable and less punitive on income earners.


164 posted on 05/31/2005 10:24:53 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: pigdog
That's why having a base of consumption rather than income as the tax base used for S/Ss would be preferable and less punitive on income earners.

People who don't have much disposable income won't do much consuming. Look at consumer debt today. People are up to their eyeballs in debt. Those same people aren't saving appropriately into their defined contribution retirement plans. They really expect social security to catch them when they retire with insufficient money set aside for retirement. Those same parties will likely still be mired in consumer debt on retirement, but they won't have a fat paycheck to cover their credit obligations. They are in for a rude awakening.

173 posted on 05/31/2005 10:56:42 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson