Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pigdog
That's why having a base of consumption rather than income as the tax base used for S/Ss would be preferable and less punitive on income earners.

People who don't have much disposable income won't do much consuming. Look at consumer debt today. People are up to their eyeballs in debt. Those same people aren't saving appropriately into their defined contribution retirement plans. They really expect social security to catch them when they retire with insufficient money set aside for retirement. Those same parties will likely still be mired in consumer debt on retirement, but they won't have a fat paycheck to cover their credit obligations. They are in for a rude awakening.

173 posted on 05/31/2005 10:56:42 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: Myrddin; pigdog
People who don't have much disposable income won't do much consuming.
Sure they will, they'll all get another government check every month
Look at consumer debt today.

That's what makes the sales pitch of the fairtax so attractive to the numbskulls...their taxes would be charged to the Visa, MC, car payment, mortgage etc. without ever knowing the difference.

229 posted on 05/31/2005 5:10:18 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson