Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raytheon awarded $3b Navy contract ( DD(X) )
Boston Globe ^ | May 24, 2005 | Robert Weisman

Posted on 05/26/2005 1:43:31 PM PDT by Righty_McRight

Raytheon Co. yesterday won a $3 billion Navy contract to develop radar and other systems for a new class of destroyers that will pioneer technology for a variety of ships in coming decades.

The award is one of the Waltham company's largest ever. It is a follow-on to previous contracts the Naval Sea Systems Command has given Raytheon for the destroyer program, called the DD(X). The new destroyers are being envisioned as the first vessels in the service's 21st century fleet of high-tech fighting ships.

But the contract comes as concerns mount in Congress over the rising cost of the program, now estimated at more than $3 billion a ship, and the fates of competing shipyards in Maine and Mississippi where the destroyers would be built.

Most of the work on the DD(X) systems is being done at Raytheon sites in Tewskbury and Portsmouth, R.I. Dan Smith, the president of Raytheon's integrated defense systems unit in Tewksbury, said yesterday the new award would take the program from development into production and carries the potential for new jobs. But he insisted it was too soon to say how many jobs would be added, when, or where. The Navy contract is scheduled to run through December 2009.

''It's a big contract," Smith said. ''It's got a lot of legs."

Under the program, Raytheon is developing five systems for the new destroyers that improve on existing technology. The five systems are: radar; sonar; the ships' computing network; an external network enabling them to communicate with other ships, shore stations, and aircraft; and a missile launcher that can target other ships and ground installations. Raytheon, which is working with several engineering subcontractors, will also be the systems integrator, making all the technology work together.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: ddx; defensecontractors; defensespending; miltech; raytheon; stealth; usnavy
How many of these ships are we making again? 10-12?
1 posted on 05/26/2005 1:43:31 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

ES, here's some more news on the DDX.


2 posted on 05/26/2005 1:44:37 PM PDT by BostonianRightist (I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

I wonder how many reporters are googling Cheney+Raytheon at this very moment?


3 posted on 05/26/2005 1:45:55 PM PDT by Bigoleelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigoleelephant

lol

Grim thought, but funny.


4 posted on 05/26/2005 1:47:26 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BostonianRightist
For those interested here's the conceptual illustration:
5 posted on 05/26/2005 1:48:50 PM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BostonianRightist
>DDX


6 posted on 05/26/2005 1:49:33 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
My guess is that in the end we will get at least 24, maby a lot more. They had the same sort fo carping when the first proposd the A. Burke destroyer and we built over 60 of those.

It is a good design.

7 posted on 05/26/2005 1:58:23 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

What kind of guns are they putting on the DD(X)? I saw something about rocket assisted shells, and then something about rail guns. Which is it?


8 posted on 05/26/2005 2:02:29 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

If you search high and low to look at a picture of the DD(X) you may note that it looks a bit like the USS Monitor. It likely has slightly improved technology, though.


9 posted on 05/26/2005 2:09:49 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem

I have a feeling the final design won't "look" nearly as stealthy as many of the neato concept pictures.

Really for this ship, stealth doesn't matter that much.


10 posted on 05/26/2005 2:10:49 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
What kind of guns are they putting on the DD(X)?

Check this out.
11 posted on 05/26/2005 2:16:15 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Does anyone remember that deal with Raytheon and Brazil. The rainforest monitoring system? It was Clinton thing. Could be why they are not going nuts. IF George Bush or Dick Chaney had worked for them we would be hearing Moonbats around the country blood vessels popping.


12 posted on 05/26/2005 2:34:40 PM PDT by texassizednightcrawler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I've sensed that the stealth technology was being built into everything external on all war ships. It makes sense. On something like the DD(X) it would take a miniscule profile and make it disappear altogether.


13 posted on 05/26/2005 2:57:09 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: texassizednightcrawler
"Could be why they are not going nuts."

Raytheon is the #7 top government contractor. With 80% of contracts to the military, there isn't much complaining in Congress.

14 posted on 05/26/2005 9:55:47 PM PDT by endthematrix (Newsweek lied, people died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight; andyk
From Andy's link
"Our bottom line is that if we can put millions of joules of energy onto a target, something will happen." ... "...the burning and blinding of an optical system, or cutting an [airplane’s] wing off, or causing a fire that results in an explosion."

Pretty damned cool. Perhaps the Marine Corps should look into it, taking a beach would be nothing if those "directed energy" weapons could be aimed at a shoreline. But then again, napalm is always fun and effective.

15 posted on 05/27/2005 7:16:27 AM PDT by BostonianRightist (I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson