Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/26/2005 7:53:28 AM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JeanS

You'll get a headache looking at 'rat votes through a logical lense.


2 posted on 05/26/2005 7:56:15 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prairiebreeze; Mo1

Ping.


3 posted on 05/26/2005 7:56:57 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS
Well, I do have one guess.

I think the Donks were the most vulnerable, all over the place, on going to the mat to block two women, one of whom is black.

Just that.

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG

4 posted on 05/26/2005 7:57:59 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS; Semper Paratus; Peach

"My mama says: "Stupid is as stupid does."

6 posted on 05/26/2005 8:00:09 AM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS
And what about Pryor? The former attorney general of Alabama, Pryor was, like Owen, filibustered mostly over the issue of abortion. But unlike Owen, who appeared the picture of moderation at her confirmation hearing, Pryor, when he went before the Judiciary Committee back in June 2003, made no attempt to hide his views.

For example, Pryor had in the past called Roe v. Wade “the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.”

At the hearing, when Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) read Pryor’s words to him and asked him whether he still believed that, Pryor answered, simply, “I do.”

Later, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), trying to give Pryor an escape route, asked whether the “abomination” quote was accurate.

Pryor said that it was indeed accurate, and what was more, “I stand by that comment. I believe that not only is [Roe] unsupported by the text and structure of the Constitution, but it has led to a morally wrong result. It has led to the slaughter of millions of innocent unborn children.”

Democrats called Pryor an extremist. They dug in their heels and threw out two centuries of Senate tradition to stop him.

I like Judge Pryor!!!

9 posted on 05/26/2005 8:17:26 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS

It is good to see the names of the Judges who were screwed by the gang of 14 im-moderates ... a reminder that this was not a noble compromise, but the worst sort of backroom deal:

WE NEED TO GET VOTES FOR THESE NOMINEES:

• The nomination of Henry Saad to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals represents an “extraordinary circumstance” and will be filibustered by Democrats.

• The nomination of William Myers to the 9th Circuit represents an “extraordinary circumstance” and will be filibustered.

• The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the D.C. Circuit might represent an “extraordinary circumstance” and might be filibustered.

• The nomination of William Haynes to the 4th Circuit might represent an “extraordinary circumstance” and might be filibustered.


10 posted on 05/26/2005 8:20:18 AM PDT by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS
To the non 7 RINO senators -

SHOW SOME SPINE!

CUT THE CRAP AND NUKE THE DEMS, DANGIT ALL!!!!

11 posted on 05/26/2005 8:27:26 AM PDT by llevrok ( Former Republican. Forever Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS

Very clear article that shows the inconsistency in these judicial votes better than anything I've yet seen. Thanks for posting it.


12 posted on 05/26/2005 8:31:51 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS
Get the three through. Then send up the undetermined ones. If the Dems filibuster their half of the 14 will be torn between party loyalty and the agreement they signed. If they betray their party, we win. If they break the agreement we're back where we started except three judges are in and the Dems have admitted to being hypocrites.

Once the questionables are through, send up the "extraordinaries" and then nuke the bastards.

13 posted on 05/26/2005 8:58:52 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS

Rush jsut said that now Graham has opined that he will not vote against a filibuster of John Bolton.


14 posted on 05/26/2005 11:05:25 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeanS

The simple answer to the question has to do with who is already on the court that these people are nominated to & what was the judicial philosophy of the judge they are being nominated to replace.

Replace a conservative with a conservative, you have no change in balance of that court. Replace a liberal or a moderate with a conservative & the court issues rulings in the opposite direction than it had previously.


15 posted on 05/26/2005 2:02:22 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson