You'll get a headache looking at 'rat votes through a logical lense.
Ping.
I think the Donks were the most vulnerable, all over the place, on going to the mat to block two women, one of whom is black.
Just that.
"My mama says: "Stupid is as stupid does."
For example, Pryor had in the past called Roe v. Wade the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.
At the hearing, when Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) read Pryors words to him and asked him whether he still believed that, Pryor answered, simply, I do.
Later, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), trying to give Pryor an escape route, asked whether the abomination quote was accurate.
Pryor said that it was indeed accurate, and what was more, I stand by that comment. I believe that not only is [Roe] unsupported by the text and structure of the Constitution, but it has led to a morally wrong result. It has led to the slaughter of millions of innocent unborn children.
Democrats called Pryor an extremist. They dug in their heels and threw out two centuries of Senate tradition to stop him.
I like Judge Pryor!!!
It is good to see the names of the Judges who were screwed by the gang of 14 im-moderates ... a reminder that this was not a noble compromise, but the worst sort of backroom deal:
WE NEED TO GET VOTES FOR THESE NOMINEES:
The nomination of Henry Saad to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals represents an extraordinary circumstance and will be filibustered by Democrats.
The nomination of William Myers to the 9th Circuit represents an extraordinary circumstance and will be filibustered.
The nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the D.C. Circuit might represent an extraordinary circumstance and might be filibustered.
The nomination of William Haynes to the 4th Circuit might represent an extraordinary circumstance and might be filibustered.
SHOW SOME SPINE!
CUT THE CRAP AND NUKE THE DEMS, DANGIT ALL!!!!
Very clear article that shows the inconsistency in these judicial votes better than anything I've yet seen. Thanks for posting it.
Once the questionables are through, send up the "extraordinaries" and then nuke the bastards.
Rush jsut said that now Graham has opined that he will not vote against a filibuster of John Bolton.
The simple answer to the question has to do with who is already on the court that these people are nominated to & what was the judicial philosophy of the judge they are being nominated to replace.
Replace a conservative with a conservative, you have no change in balance of that court. Replace a liberal or a moderate with a conservative & the court issues rulings in the opposite direction than it had previously.