Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Bush a Sith Lord?
NewsMax.com ^ | May 25, 2005 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 05/25/2005 7:43:18 AM PDT by Revenge of Sith

The current episode of "Star Wars" is dynamite for the duplicitous Bush administration. Palpatine, a Sith Lord masquerading as a galactic Republican, becomes Chancellor of the Galactic Republic through deception. Palpatine uses wars that he instigates to elevate security over the power of the Senate and to become dictator.

In a moment of triumph, Palpatine tells the Senate, "In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire, for a safe and secure society." The senators respond with sustained cheering and applause. Padme says, "So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause."

Sith lords use the powers of the dark side of the force. Jedi knights use the power of the good side. The Jedi are selfless and use their incredible powers to protect the Republic. Sith are evil and crave absolute power. Palpatine, who is really Darth Sidious, manipulates the Senate and enlists the Jedi Council's patriotism to "defend" the Republic against a "separatist" army that he secretly directs. The purpose of the orchestrated war is to erode liberty in the name of security. The naive Jedi catch on too late and are decimated. The Republic falls.

Bush's "war against terrorism" is no less orchestrated than Palpatine's war and has led to the same result: a society dominated by security concerns.

The top secret British government memo that was leaked to the London Times proves beyond all doubt that Bush invaded Iraq for none of the changing reasons that he has given a too-trusting public. Bush did not invade Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction or because he wanted to bring democracy to Iraq.

Why did Bush invade Iraq? No one, least of all the Bush administration, has come up with a believable reason. Yet, there is no shortage of patriotic Republicans who sincerely believe that Bush has made America safer by turning the Muslim world against us and stirring up a hornets nest of terrorists united by their hatred of America.

Moreover, like Palpatine's war, Bush's war in Iraq appears to be interminable. U.S. military commanders say the United States will be fighting in Iraq for years to come. Forecasts are that the war will have cost taxpayers $600 billion by 2010.

Meanwhile, Bush, like Palpatine, has brought civil liberties to a crisis. In the United States, civil liberties are everywhere biting the dust. Not content with the Orwellian-named "Patriot Act," the Bush administration is pushing for expanded secret police powers. Even conservative Republican Bob Barr writes in the May 17 Washington Times that provisions of the "Patriot Act" go far beyond fighting terrorism "and undermine our constitutional freedoms and Fourth Amendment rights."

Barr is chairman of a coalition called Patriots to Restore Checks and Balances. In other words, dear readers, the checks and balances are gone. Bush has enabled the police to bypass the courts. Executive power rules, and there are no Jedi knights.

The Sith, however, are everywhere. In our day, the Sith masquerade as neoconservatives. Neocons deal in absolutes. They believe the end justifies the means. As the Jedi master Obi-Wan tells Anakin, who is turning to the dark side and emerging as Darth Vader, "Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes." Anakin to Obi-Wan: "If you're not with me, you're my enemy."

Palpatine is able to manipulate the Galactic Senate with the clever use of words that play upon emotions. People want to feel secure. They want their side to prevail and will do whatever it takes to win, including trading their republic for an empire. Palpatine prevails because people deceive themselves.

Republicans have become adept at self-deception. They will believe any argument that justifies Bush and no news report that casts doubt on Bush's war. The leaked British government memo is dismissed as just more anti-Bush propaganda from the liberal press, like Dan Rather and Newsweek.

Newsweek's retraction of its story that U.S. soldiers flushed a Quran down a toilet proves to Republicans that the only problem is an anti-American liberal media. The fact that Newsweek was absolutely correct in reporting desecration of the Quran by U.S. troops -- and only got wrong the particular way in which the holy book was desecrated -- has been totally ignored by Republicans.

Republicans believe everything Bush says. When he tells them he needs a police state to save them from terrorists, they believe him.

Who will save us from Bush's police state?

Just as Child Protective Services has had to frame innocent parents and child-care providers as child abusers in order to justify its budgets and a massive bureaucracy, the vast Homeland Security apparatus will have to "find" terrorists. Otherwise, there is no point to all the expanded police powers and the huge budget.

Just as the indignities of airport security and its assorted searches fall on loyal American citizens, the police state measures will also fall on loyal American citizens.

With the courts bypassed, a terrorist is whoever the secret police say is a terrorist. The U.S. government is already committing the crime of kidnapping people mistakenly identified as terrorist suspects and flying them to brutal regimes to be tortured.

Police states have an insatiable need for enemies. In Stalin's time, the secret police conducted "street sweeps." People waiting for buses and shopping for food were carted off to prison, where they were tortured until they implicated others. Thus was the Gulag filled with innocents.

"It can't happen here," but the beginnings of it already have. The U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba is full of mistaken identities and people who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time -- including, according to The Associated Press, a chicken farmer and an invalid. Bush's brand of democracy -- a regime that holds people in prison for three years without charges -- does not have civil liberties at heart.

Republicans are cheering. According to news reports, Congress has passed -- and Bush is about to sign -- a law requiring a national identity card (Real ID) containing invasive digital information about the person.

How long will it be before the card specifies whether the person is a gun owner? If it is dangerous for air travel to permit a passenger to have a toothpick or nail clippers, how can a terrorist-threatened society permit mass gun ownership?

If the constitutional protections of civil liberties can be suspended in order to better fight terrorism, the Second Amendment doesn't have a chance. A government that spies on its citizens will not trust them with guns. When gun control becomes an essential feature of Homeland Security, the National Rifle Association and talk radio conservatives will be as astounded as Bail Organa and Padme when they hear Palpatine declare "an empire ... and a sovereign ruler chosen for life."


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush43; itsjustamovie; moviereview; paranoia; paulcraigroberts; revengeofthesith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: Restorer
Invalids can't be terrorists?

If I'm not mistaken, Al-Zarqawi has some sort of physical handicap that resulted from some previous injury. I guess he can't be considered a terrorist.
41 posted on 05/25/2005 8:14:05 AM PDT by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith
"The fact that Newsweek was absolutely correct in reporting desecration of the Quran by U.S. troops -- and only got wrong the particular way in which the holy book was desecrated -- has been totally ignored by Republicans."

It seems that the left sees it as OK to make outrageous claims as long as they want them to be true.
42 posted on 05/25/2005 8:14:50 AM PDT by MJRitter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith
As the Jedi master Obi-Wan tells Anakin, who is turning to the dark side and emerging as Darth Vader, "Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes." Anakin to Obi-Wan: "If you're not with me, you're my enemy."

The first quote could have come out of JF'n Kerry's mouth (sounds like "nuance" to me). The second quote could easily have come out of Hillary.

43 posted on 05/25/2005 8:15:05 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

Why do people like make comparisons between real people and someone who is nothing more than a figment of someone's imagination put on the big screen? Sheesh!


44 posted on 05/25/2005 8:15:40 AM PDT by Luna (Lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade at Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

I'm suprised Newsmax would include this article. It's actually pretty good


45 posted on 05/25/2005 8:15:47 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AaronInCarolina

Many famous warriors down through history have been invalids.

Nelson was missing an arm and an eye.

Confederate general Hood had both an arm and a leg missing.

To give just two of many examples.


46 posted on 05/25/2005 8:16:27 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

Now Rove, on the other hand...


47 posted on 05/25/2005 8:17:43 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
No, but I have.

Man, now I'm confused. Who's sister are you boofing, yours or Paul Craig Roberts?

48 posted on 05/25/2005 8:17:44 AM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pelayo

Kind of sucks for Senator Bail Organa, having adopted a daughter, only to have that result in the destruction of his home planet.

Basketball is a peaceful planet! Please! We have no weapons!


49 posted on 05/25/2005 8:18:48 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: QueenBee3
How about this line adaptation, "The United Nations Building. You will never find a more retched hive of scum and villainy."
50 posted on 05/25/2005 8:19:44 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. - John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Paul Craig Roberts has lost it. I bet he's been boofing his sister.
No, but I have.


You've been boofing your sister? EEEEEEW.

My response to the article is this: The Executive Office is not the usurper of liberties here. It's the Judicial Branch.
51 posted on 05/25/2005 8:20:29 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Would you like an apple pie with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith
"Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes."

It's funny how many people seem to think that this movie is really about Bush. Never mind that the basic premise and idea were written 30 years ago. This is not the first article I've read that refers to the above line as condemning "proof" that Bush is evil. You frequently hear similar comments made by liberals about Bush, and conservatives in general. Isn't it ironic that the statement is itself an absolute?

52 posted on 05/25/2005 8:23:04 AM PDT by usapatriot28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

No. It's movie. Made by capitalists to make money...lots of money.


53 posted on 05/25/2005 8:23:29 AM PDT by Dallas59 (" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

What drooling paranoia! LOL!


54 posted on 05/25/2005 8:23:56 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Hood lost the arm at Gettysburg. I am not so sure about the leg.

Union Brigadier Gen. Thomas Meagher didn't have his right (or left I cant remember exactly) after Fredricksburg....


55 posted on 05/25/2005 8:24:21 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Is anyone else ready for football to begin again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

I hear Bush has fantastic skill with a light sabre, and Al Franken nedy reminds me of Jar Jar Binks.


56 posted on 05/25/2005 8:24:25 AM PDT by BadAndy (Specializing in unnecessarily harsh comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"The top secret British government memo that was leaked to the London Times proves beyond all doubt that Bush invaded Iraq for none of the changing reasons that he has given a too-trusting public."

Anyone have a clue what this is about? What document?

"In the United States, civil liberties are everywhere biting the dust."

Name one. Please. Someone. Just name one.

57 posted on 05/25/2005 8:26:48 AM PDT by Romish_Papist (The times are out of step with the Catholic Church. God Bless Pope Benedict XVI.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

I believe that anyone who uses violence to achieve his ends can be seduced by the "dark side", but it doesn't mean that he will be. If limited by a firm moral foundation, as the President is, the probability is small. On the other hand, the use of violence by liberals to achieve their ends, as in using the full power of the government to limit people's liberties, is unfettered by morality. I believe that liberals are, metaphorical speaking, having their destinies controlled by the 'dark side."


58 posted on 05/25/2005 8:27:17 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

I found one thing hysterically funny during the new Star Wars flick. Everyone in the media said it was a bash against Bush (and it was), but Emperor Palpitaine looks just like old Sheets Byrd.

Now I know that the senile old bigot would have a problem with the DARK side of the force, but he has a problem with DARK people in general.


59 posted on 05/25/2005 8:27:39 AM PDT by exile (Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz, you're nuts. LOL. :)


60 posted on 05/25/2005 8:28:08 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson