No.
If not, what kind of evidence would be acceptable?
The presence of a designer would be a good start.
So, when you see an automobile, you need to see the person who designed it in order to have suitable evidence it was designed?
Misses the mark IMO. What is required is a theory of design that meets scientific criteria. If you cannot, from the theory, say that when A is observed we will also observe B (perhaps with a given probability), then it is not a scientific theory.
ID does not meet this criterion. But science does employ other theories of design. If fact I would say that such theories are routinely employed, in archeology for example.