[Fester Chugabrew]

. . . there's no evidence for its validity.

Do you believe science by definition is incapable of comprehending evidence for intelligent design? If so, why? If not, what kind of evidence would be acceptable?

[AntiGuv]

Do you believe science by definition is incapable of comprehending evidence for intelligent design?

No.

If not, what kind of evidence would be acceptable?

The presence of a designer would be a good start.

[AntiGuv]

Do you believe science by definition is incapable of comprehending evidence for intelligent design?

No.

If not, what kind of evidence would be acceptable?

The presence of a designer would be a good start.