Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox: 730pm Press Conference to Announce Filibuster Compromise

Posted on 05/23/2005 4:18:39 PM PDT by jern

Announce Filibuster Compromise


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; 2008; bbsforballs; betrayedagain; brinkmanforcongress; candyassrepublicans; castratedrino; castrati; cowardicegop; defeatdewine; dewine; filibuster; fillibusted; fooledagain; goats; gopcojonesinajar; johnmccain; johnwarner; lyingdemocrats; mccain4dnc; nomorerncmoney; notdonatingtornc; olympiasnowe; packmonkeys; partyofthecastrated; payback4scprimary2k; reacharound; rochlab; sellout; sellouts; shirleypants; sodomy; spineless; spinelessbastards; tulipbreath; turass; ussenate; warner; weakness; weasels; willywonkagut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,4801,481-1,5001,501-1,520 ... 2,481-2,482 next last
To: BushWonGore'sDone
Yes and when extraordinary circumstances arise again perhaps the Dems will have gained another 6 or 8 seats from the 2006 election and will block Bush's last two years of appointees.

The Dems picked up 7 seats tonight. I think they give some of them back in 2006.

1,481 posted on 05/23/2005 6:43:49 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1474 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Now that is sweet [smile], now, get in line and let's keep fighting!


1,482 posted on 05/23/2005 6:44:28 PM PDT by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1419 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I think the deal was that the Republicans would oppose any change in the rules during this congress without exception which is a big loss considering that the Democrats put conditions on the pledge to refrain from filibustering.
1,483 posted on 05/23/2005 6:44:36 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Such insightful remarks! Why don't you evolve and then we can have a conversation? In the meantime, go back to playing with crayons and the picture book. You haven't made one coherent point and spend all your time in condescending others. Sounds like a real grown-up.


1,484 posted on 05/23/2005 6:44:43 PM PDT by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1463 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

well, as much as i disagree with McCain, i still respect his service, therefore i wish him a successful recovery and many long years retired away from the senate.


1,485 posted on 05/23/2005 6:44:59 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1468 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

I wonder what Rush is going to say tomorrow.


1,486 posted on 05/23/2005 6:45:14 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Allen/DeLay '08!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1441 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

Oh sheesh, Chrissy matthews, now swooning over mccain like a girl at a 1964 Beatles concert.


1,487 posted on 05/23/2005 6:45:15 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1479 | View Replies]

To: StarFan


John is in his collective glory! He pulled it off and TKO'd POTUS. Nothing like payback time.


1,488 posted on 05/23/2005 6:45:17 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1479 | View Replies]

To: BushWonGore'sDone
Yes and when extraordinary circumstances arise again perhaps the Dems will have gained another 6 or 8 seats from the 2006 election and will block Bush's last two years of appointees.

They are going to oppose the next bunch of judges because they are Reailian's.;)

1,489 posted on 05/23/2005 6:45:28 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1474 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Reid was practically giddy tonight. He knew he won. Any future nominees to SCOTUS will have to get his approval.

Want another Scalia or Thomas, forget it. Think Rove v Wade will be overturned - forget it.

Like the way the Fed courts have ruled in the last 20 years - you'll be happy - Just like the ACLU.

Religious conservatives - stop voting Republican - vote your pocketbook.
1,490 posted on 05/23/2005 6:45:44 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1443 | View Replies]

To: livius

I think you're absolutely correct. Now I'd like to see someone in leadership disavow themselves from this "deal," saying that it doesn't represent the sentiments of the vast majority of the Republican caucus.


1,491 posted on 05/23/2005 6:46:49 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1336 | View Replies]

To: Will_Zurmacht
well, as much as i disagree with McCain, i still respect his service ...

Yes, well even Benedict Arnold rendered service ...

1,492 posted on 05/23/2005 6:47:03 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1485 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

As I said in another post, I've voted a straight Republican ticket for 30 years. I've always counted the days until we had both houses of Congress and the presidency so we could appoint conservative judges--the only way we have left to save our country. It was in our grasp, but Frist let the RINOs snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I've told the RNC to get screwed when they called me for money, tell them they can go to Hell now that we've forfeited our right to run the Senate: membership@rnchq.org


1,493 posted on 05/23/2005 6:47:09 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1469 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Here's what this "Moderate" agreement says: We'll stop using the filibuster to block judges and go back to the previous 214 year tradition and you won't change the Rules to formalize the tradition.

The result is the same in practice as if we had formalized the Rules change to make the tradition crystal-clear. We still will not see filibusters of judicial nominees going forward except maybe a very rare case. If the moderate Democrats go right back to stonewalling judicial nominees using filbusters, these seven Democrats will be the ones who breached the agreement first.

This is not a big deal. I have predicted for months that the Democrats would allow votes if they thought they would lose the "nuke" vote. They will not be filibustering any more. (If they break their promise, the nuke option happens still).


1,494 posted on 05/23/2005 6:47:24 PM PDT by RobFromGa (Enact Constitutional Option Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies]

Comment #1,495 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx

All I know is that there were 7 Dims and 7 RINO's. McLame being one of them. I had the misfortune of being away from a TV.


1,496 posted on 05/23/2005 6:47:49 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Don't hate me because I'm a player)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1471 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Religious conservatives - stop voting Republican - vote your pocketbook

Yeah, your pocketbook will be raided by voting for the democrats. Real smart there.

1,497 posted on 05/23/2005 6:47:57 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1490 | View Replies]

To: etcb
I think the deal was that the Republicans would oppose any change in the rules during this congress without exception which is a big loss considering that the Democrats put conditions on the pledge to refrain from filibustering.

Unless the Democrats violate the "exceptional circumstances" clause.

Then, all bets are off.

1,498 posted on 05/23/2005 6:48:13 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1483 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini

No, don't contribute to the democrat. Better to find a primary challenger for Olympia and one for Susan too. Who's up for relection next?


1,499 posted on 05/23/2005 6:48:13 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1397 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

B. Arnold gave his leg for the revolution - no one remembers that...


1,500 posted on 05/23/2005 6:48:20 PM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1492 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,4801,481-1,5001,501-1,520 ... 2,481-2,482 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson