Why would links presenting the evidence on a physics/astronomy/nuclear chemistry question worry about some kind of population demographic issue?
The number of intelligent observers can only assist in verifying the information, right? I don't think modern science wants to know the answer to my question. But since "modern science" (a laughable concept when applied to Darwinism) is so intent on proclaiming the number of adnherents and amount of agreement as evidence of veracity, maybe this line of reasoning suits them perfectly.