To: VadeRetro
Why would links presenting the evidence on a physics/astronomy/nuclear chemistry question worry about some kind of population demographic issue?The number of intelligent observers can only assist in verifying the information, right? I don't think modern science wants to know the answer to my question. But since "modern science" (a laughable concept when applied to Darwinism) is so intent on proclaiming the number of adnherents and amount of agreement as evidence of veracity, maybe this line of reasoning suits them perfectly.
To: Fester Chugabrew
Hint: It's not an election. Important studies get replicated. If a finding is wrong, it doesn't work and we figure it out. Come to think of it, that's how we got from the time everyone was a creationist--1780 or so--to here. Creationism flunked all the tests.
356 posted on
05/23/2005 6:49:35 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson