Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't think I needed to put a puke alert since it's obvious being a gun grabbing editorial by Josh Horror, I mean Horowitz of CSGV. He even sites his buddy Josh Suckermann, I mean Sugarmann of VPC in this one.
1 posted on 05/21/2005 10:42:39 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Dan from Michigan
The most recent example of the tension came last month, when Florida Gov. Jeb Bush signed a bill that allows people to use deadly force -- including guns -- when faced with a violent threat, even when a confrontation could be avoided by simply walking away.

He's right. Imagine, those backward Bushes have gotten the crazy idea that people actually have the right to defend themselves! If I am ever confronted by an armed robber or rapist, instead of using force I will beg him to spare me while I await help from the Almighty government. No thug would want to harm me if I fell to his feet crying hard enough . /liberal "logic"

39 posted on 05/21/2005 11:23:02 PM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
"The most recent example of the tension came last month, when Florida Gov. Jeb Bush signed a bill that allows people to use deadly force -- including guns -- when faced with a violent threat, even when a confrontation could be avoided by simply walking away. The new law goes far beyond self-defense, which was already a well-established right in Florida, to invite vigilantes to substitute their judgment for the judicial system. "

Florida eliminated it's "requirement to run" law, and I believe adapted Texas law that says basically that any legally armed citizen is not required to run. If you feel that your life is being threatened, you can use deadly force, and this has not caused any problems in Texas.

43 posted on 05/21/2005 11:30:12 PM PDT by de Buillion (Jerusalem, 1099)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
Josh, if you're really serious about changing things, feel free to go out there and confiscate all those guns on your own.
47 posted on 05/21/2005 11:55:57 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
josh (w)hor(e)witz
55 posted on 05/22/2005 12:11:32 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change government support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee

ping


56 posted on 05/22/2005 12:16:47 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change government support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
I don't think I needed to put a puke alert

Pardon me if I go ahead and puke anyway.

57 posted on 05/22/2005 12:16:53 AM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Don't worry. My suit is triple-flameproof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
"As LaPierre puts it, "The Second Amendment is the fulcrum of freedom in our nation, because freedom and the Second Amendment are mutually interdependent. They are the 'chicken and the egg;' neither can exist without the other.""

So what part of that statement can't the commies/socialists/gun-grabbing fascists/fabian/gramsciites understand?

" . . . they are threats to our democracy and our way of life.", says Horrorwits.

Of course they are! They are supposed to be. Take 'your way of life' and 'democracy' and set up shop in another country, stupid. We'll keep our Republic -- one way or another. Count on it!

58 posted on 05/22/2005 12:20:03 AM PDT by Eastbound (Jacked out since 3/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

So Josh, just what is it you have in mind for me, that you're so damned worried about me having a gun?? Hmmm?


59 posted on 05/22/2005 12:23:39 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

"Citizens need to be armed
to protect themselves against
a tyrannical government."

                -- Senator Ted Kennedy



60 posted on 05/22/2005 12:28:32 AM PDT by devolve ( That Music Still Continues: http://pro.lookingat.us/ElvisLive.html - more traffic than DU-Koz-LDot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan; All
horwitz osunds like apretty jewish name and it seems to me there was a country that had democratically elected officials that passed laws whose policies were subjected to review by an independent judiciary in a constitutional democracy and that constitutional democracy passed a buttload of guncontrol laws around 1938 and the end result wasnt to great fora whole lot of people in that country


61 posted on 05/22/2005 12:40:57 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change government support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
The standoffs at Ruby Ridge and Waco -- often cited as proof that the government can and does abuse its power -- illustrate why armed resistance is a dead end. Randy Weaver and David Koresh may have had good reasons to distrust the government, but they had no right to use private arsenals to keep the police at bay.

Those were tactical defeats, but moral and strategic victories, for the cause of freedom and gun rights. Government types sometimes forget that these are liberties jealously guarded by millions of people. Waco was a bracing reminder that there are limits to what government can foist on the people in this country. The scrutiny the FBI and BATF endured afterwards will be long remembered by those in charge.

If they believe in the right to take up arms to resist government policies they consider oppressive, even when these policies have been adopted by elected officials and subjected to review by an independent judiciary, then they are opposed to constitutional democracy.

Straw man! Nobody I know ever argues that this is the case. Armed resistance is for when constitutional democracy is usurped.

-ccm

71 posted on 05/22/2005 2:11:01 AM PDT by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
As famed legal scholar Roscoe Pound observed, however, "A legal right of the citizen to wage war on the government is something that cannot be admitted

I never heard of this clown. It is obvious he has not read the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire.

Part I, Article 10: [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.

June 2, 1784

72 posted on 05/22/2005 2:17:01 AM PDT by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

This is bourgeois to bourgeois scarifying tactic.Stick to your guns,the ones who don't will be fried,despite the implicit threat.As Christ said:if you have money,give it all away,and sell your coat to buy a sword.


73 posted on 05/22/2005 2:17:27 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
"This warped conception of popular sovereignty is at the root of the most egregious anti- democratic proposition advanced by the gun lobby: that citizens need to arm themselves to safeguard political liberties against threats by the government.

Sounds like the purpose of the second ammendment to me. Amen.
74 posted on 05/22/2005 2:26:39 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Read later.


77 posted on 05/22/2005 3:06:26 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

"Guns equal freedom"....what else needs to be said?...no one will ever consider invading your abode if they even think you have a weapon...believe me, it's true.


78 posted on 05/22/2005 3:20:06 AM PDT by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Poor Horowitz. I'm sure someone will protect him.

Or maybe he is already safe - it makes complete sense that criminals obey gun laws and would never think of getting a weapon through illegal channels, noooo. Man, must be nice living somewhere other than reality.


82 posted on 05/22/2005 4:01:39 AM PDT by Atheist_Canadian_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
"Protecting vigilantes from criminal prosecution and urging citizens to stockpile weapons for a showdown with the government are more than just threats to public safety -- they are threats to our democracy and our way of life." - Josh Horowitz

As usual, the Libs have it all wrong.

FREEDOM

83 posted on 05/22/2005 4:30:36 AM PDT by Gritty ("Dangerous ideas have killed many millions more people than dangerous handguns" - Bill Whittle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS THE RESET BUTTON ON THE CONSTITUTION...BEN FRANKLIN?


84 posted on 05/22/2005 4:30:39 AM PDT by UltraKonservativen (( YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
This warped conception of popular sovereignty is at the root of the most egregious anti- democratic proposition advanced by the gun lobby: that citizens need to arm themselves to safeguard political liberties against threats by the government.

Good thing he was not around during the American revolution.

87 posted on 05/22/2005 4:41:32 AM PDT by Guard Dog (The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson