Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge urges an end to verbal attacks
Inside Gay ..er...Bay Area ^ | 5/19/2005

Posted on 05/20/2005 12:43:15 PM PDT by worldclass

A federal judge whose husband and mother were slain by a disgruntled litigant urged Congress on Wednesday to help bring an end to "truly dangerous" verbal attacks on judges that might lead to violent action. In addition to asking lawmakers to "publicly and persistently repudiate gratuitous attacks on the judiciary," Lefkow called on Congress to increase funding for the U.S. Marshals Service, which protects judges. She also wants legislation to ban putting personal information about judges and other government officials on the Internet without their permission.

(Excerpt) Read more at insidebayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: imperialjudiciary; judges; judicialtyranny; judiciary; lefkow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Def of a liberal judge: screw society and hide behind a black cloak; see also judicial rapists using protection

oooops...was that a verbal attack?

1 posted on 05/20/2005 12:43:15 PM PDT by worldclass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: worldclass

Obey the Constitution, then we'll talk, Mrs. Federal Judge.


2 posted on 05/20/2005 12:46:45 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Problem is -- they think they are the Constitution.
3 posted on 05/20/2005 12:54:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"Fostering disrespect for judges can only encourage those that are on the edge, or on the fringe, to exact revenge," Lefkow told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Seems to me the first step in having respect is to behave in a manner that merits respect. Demanding it as a perk of having a black robe while the judiciary dismantles the constitution and the social fabric of our nation is ridiculous.

This is just a repeat of the classic liberal attack that Clinton pioneered after the Murrah bombing. In effect, he sold the country, for a short time, on the notion that Newt and Rush were somehow responsible for the bombing because they fostered disrespect for the government. As a result of that disrespect, McVeigh bombed the Murrah building.

So the upshot is, we have to pretend we respect judges and the feds so that crazy people won't attack them. Every time a crazy person attacks a judge or a liberal, it proves we are not sufficiently respectful and we have to try harder to be respectful.

4 posted on 05/20/2005 12:56:43 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

Why don't the judges just rule that Congress can't say these things anymore. Call it an emanation of a penumbra of Article III.


5 posted on 05/20/2005 12:56:58 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

When Judges stop making law maybe.


6 posted on 05/20/2005 12:57:16 PM PDT by Nyboe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
"truly dangerous" verbal attacks

"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!, now go away...or I will taunt you again!"

7 posted on 05/20/2005 12:58:09 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
A federal judge... urged Congress on Wednesday to help bring an end to "truly dangerous" verbal attacks on judges that might lead to violent action.

Damn straight! Tell that Harry Reid to shut up. Schumer, too.


8 posted on 05/20/2005 1:00:06 PM PDT by Nick Danger (He's dead, Jim. But he's electable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

How about some of these judges having respect FOR US!!!!! They are our public servants, we don't exist for their benefit.


9 posted on 05/20/2005 1:06:03 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

She should resign her lifetime position and return to private life.


10 posted on 05/20/2005 1:08:03 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
In the context of the constant drumbeat of explicit calls by left-wingers to assassinate the President, and the protection granted by these very judges to that "speech", I can only smirk in wry irony at their demands.
11 posted on 05/20/2005 1:13:32 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

Hey, that's the risk of the job. These appts are for life, right? They get nice large raises while the rest of have to make do. Plus, these federal judges keep crossing the line making law instead of their job which is to interpret the law. Now they want protection when they screw up? No way, Jose! No how! End of discussion! Suspect these judges will want next hazardous pay on top of the plush salary they already receive.


12 posted on 05/20/2005 1:14:33 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
"A constitution... is to a government what the laws made afterwards by that government are to a court of Judicature. The court of Judicature does not make the laws, neither can it alter them; it only acts in conformity to the laws made: and the government is in like manner governed by the constitution." - Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791.

"Judges... should always be men of learning and experience in the laws, of exemplary morals, great patience, calmness and attention; their minds should not be distracted with jarring interest; they should not be dependent upon any man or body of men." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Wythe. July 1776.

"These decisions [of federal judges] nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by little and little the foundations of the Constitution, and working its change by construction before anyone has perceived that this humble and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Adamantios Korais. Mid - 1780’s

"Knowing that religion does not furnish grosser bigots than law, I expect little from old judges." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Thomas Cooper. 1810.

"This member of government was at first considered as the most harmless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining, slying and without alarm, the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare attempt." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Edward Livingston. 1825.

Founders Speak Out.

13 posted on 05/20/2005 1:18:52 PM PDT by PsyOp (Wherever law ends, tyranny begins… - Rousseau.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
More poignantly, Lefkow said, "I am the wife who wakes up in the middle of the morning, not to a cup of coffee presented by my husband of 30 years to reopen what we called the endless conversation of marriage,' but to an open book that I was reading in an effort to banish the memories of 5:30 p.m. on the day that changed our world forever."

Here's a suggested reading list.

14 posted on 05/20/2005 1:19:39 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Ferget all that stuff about respect, not making laws, etc.; I saw this loon talking and she wants us to pay for judges security system AT HOME.

I'd sooner pay for a security system for a family stuck in a crack neighborhood as I would for these folks that have gotten fat off the sweat of our brows. They want a home security system they can buy it like the rest of us have to. It's not like she's making a provery wage.

The entitlement mentality the "ruling class" has developed over the past 20 years is truly disgusting. A couple of judges get popped and they freak like it's the end of the world. Hey Lefkow, sorry it happened, but guess what, it happens every day to us "ordinary" folk. You don't want to take the very, very minor risk of a whackjob taking you or your family out? Quit your job and don't leave the house.

Or better yet quit your judge job and work as a solo cop on a major drug highway.

Oh yeah, that'd never do, you're part of the ruling class and as a cop you'd have to mingle with the rest of us.

15 posted on 05/20/2005 1:20:05 PM PDT by Proud_texan (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
In a republic, the judiciary is never above criticism.

Sorry.

16 posted on 05/20/2005 1:20:52 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

"In a republic, the judiciary is never above criticism."

I guess that is the point. How far from totally losing the Republic are we?


17 posted on 05/20/2005 1:27:07 PM PDT by worldclass (www.massright.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: worldclass

About 33 years ago.


18 posted on 05/20/2005 1:28:28 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: worldclass
Growing up in the mid west I can remember a time when judges were held in great respect. Times have changed and and now we see judges drunk with arrogance, judges on the take, judges arrested for DUI and corruption and then we have the activist judges that change laws t suit themselves and spit in our faces while doing it. Sorry judge you guys brought this on yourselves.
19 posted on 05/20/2005 1:28:53 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
So the upshot is, we have to pretend we respect judges and the feds so that crazy people won't attack them. Every time a crazy person attacks a judge or a liberal, it proves we are not sufficiently respectful and we have to try harder to be respectful.

Of course the DUmbocRAT attack on judges nominated by Bush for higher courts, well they're open game, right????

Horses**t! They ARE the CRAZY people.

20 posted on 05/20/2005 1:32:42 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson