Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could New York Vote 'Red' In 2008?
Fox News ^ | 5/20/05 | Dana Blanton

Posted on 05/20/2005 11:01:22 AM PDT by An Old Marine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Barney Gumble
Republicans had a much better shot in 2000, when she only won by 52-48% against a no name replacement for Guiliani. Now it is much harder, if not impossible.

Check your figures. Hillary actually beat Loozio by about 12 points.

21 posted on 05/20/2005 11:51:42 AM PDT by Clemenza (Now its dark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble
Found it:

2000 Senate Race Hillary Clinton 55.27%

Rick Lazio: 43%

Other: 1.73%

22 posted on 05/20/2005 11:53:53 AM PDT by Clemenza (Now its dark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
Could New York Vote 'Red' In 2008?

Hmmm...let me see...uh...no.

23 posted on 05/20/2005 11:58:18 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
Vote communist??? Hillary could declare herself communist world leader and NY would vote for her.

Vote republican, yes, if Hillary were on the ticket.

24 posted on 05/20/2005 12:02:08 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

You illustrate a good point when people compare previous elections. The fact is that many of those blue collar conservative Democrats around in the '80's are gone. They've been replaced by their hippie children. That is why it is unlikely to see sweeps of states as with Reagan and Nixon any longer. The '70's generation replaced their parents and unless their children replace THEM, it looks to stay the same for awhile.


25 posted on 05/20/2005 12:06:39 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
New York vote for a Republican President? Never, unless the Democrat running is more conservative (fat chance)!

They'd pull the lever for the Devil first.

26 posted on 05/20/2005 12:09:26 PM PDT by Gritty ("If a welfare state were a German S&M club, the government is the S and you're the M."-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine

Manhattan Republican here (guess not a "real" Republican, but have not voted for a Democrat in 12 years in any election). No way this place goes Red. I depressingly noted that I was one of 16% of the Manhattan population that voted for Bush last November. Bloomberg (definitely not a real Republican) will likely lose to a Bronx Hispanic candidate in the next mayoral election, and we'll be annexed by France soon after. Au revoir!


27 posted on 05/20/2005 12:14:18 PM PDT by Bruceski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Upstate had a number of red counties. We aren't really blue in central new york except in college towns and cities. The rest of us have good sense.


28 posted on 05/20/2005 12:16:30 PM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine

The biggest problem will be winning any Bush states for Hillary. Don't get me wrong because any democrat is formidable with their national vote fraud machine.


29 posted on 05/20/2005 12:24:18 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syco

30 posted on 05/20/2005 12:26:04 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Two chances....Slim and None; and Slim's HIV positive.


31 posted on 05/20/2005 12:27:54 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (I don't drink and FReep...it just looks that way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bruceski

The last neighborhood I lived in in Brooklyn at least had a Republican State Senator (Marty Golden) and was in Vito Fossella's district. The rest of Brooklyn, like Manhattan, is only red in the sense of the October Revolution.


32 posted on 05/20/2005 1:31:52 PM PDT by Clemenza (Now it's dark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

This just in: Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein ahead of George Bush in the most recent Marist College poll of 1899 registered New York City voters.


33 posted on 05/20/2005 1:42:36 PM PDT by Bruceski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine

The New York that went for Reagan is gone, just like California. And we lost both states for the same reason, uncontrolled third world immigration that is largely poor, votes for government handouts, and provides the margin of victory for socialist politicians.

Since 1980, the white population of New York (Broke 50-49 for Bush) dropped by over a million. The legal Hispanic population (went Kerry 3:1) increased by 75%. The black population (Kerry 10:1) increased over 25%.


34 posted on 05/20/2005 4:31:56 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson