Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: areafiftyone
2 posted on
05/18/2005 6:57:15 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
To: areafiftyone
3 posted on
05/18/2005 6:57:19 AM PDT by
sarasotarepublican
(Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
To: areafiftyone
The prosecution looks like it's trying to throw the case....
4 posted on
05/18/2005 6:58:29 AM PDT by
freebilly
To: areafiftyone
We've been KenStarred again.
To: areafiftyone
Looks like Hillary is flexing her FBI File muscles. Scary stuff. First the DoJ lets Sandy Berger off the hook, and now this.
7 posted on
05/18/2005 7:00:59 AM PDT by
montag813
To: areafiftyone
9 posted on
05/18/2005 7:01:06 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
("We, the people, are the...masters of...the courts..." -Abraham Lincoln)
To: areafiftyone
The future President Clinton must have promised Zeidenberg a seat on the Supreme Court when she gets control of the government.
10 posted on
05/18/2005 7:01:10 AM PDT by
Flint
To: areafiftyone
I guess the duoopolopy, Republicrat government rolls on. And people wonder why so many voters are apathetic and don't bother to vote...
11 posted on
05/18/2005 7:01:27 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: areafiftyone
Thanks for the post. Very interesting.
13 posted on
05/18/2005 7:03:50 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: areafiftyone
More of "The New Tone" Bush has brought to Washington?
14 posted on
05/18/2005 7:04:18 AM PDT by
umgud
(FR, NASCAR, NRA, GOP)
To: areafiftyone
Recent reports claim that President Bush and his brother Jeb now refer to the former president as "Bubba" and "Bro." Impeachable offense? This article makes me absolutely sick to my stomach.
To: areafiftyone
Looks like Michael Savage got this one right. Bush is inexplicably doing everything in his power to elect Hillary Clinton president 2008.
To: doug from upland
20 posted on
05/18/2005 7:08:32 AM PDT by
tomkat
To: areafiftyone
Just what makes this guy a BUSH prosecutor? Because he is a lifer in the Justice Dept.?
23 posted on
05/18/2005 7:11:55 AM PDT by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: areafiftyone
Disappointed but not surprised am I
24 posted on
05/18/2005 7:12:33 AM PDT by
txroadhawg
(Don't believe any statistics unless you made them up yourself)
Pathetic.
Just nitpicking, but Newsmax needs to edit its re-written stories.
the Bush Justice Department has decided to deep-six it's best evidence against Rosen
A good rule of thumb: Never use apostrophes if you don't know the simple rules governing their usage.
To: areafiftyone
This smells very funny. The "Bush prosecutor"? Could this be another attempt by the Bush camp to prop up the Clintons for some unnkown reason?
The "Illuminati are in control of both the Clintons and the Bushes" conspiracy freeks should be working overtime on this one.
To: areafiftyone
28 posted on
05/18/2005 7:18:25 AM PDT by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: areafiftyone
Why are the Republicans so terrified of annoying the scumbag dems? From the Senate Judiciary Computer memos to this, the Pubbies seem unable to do anything when they have a foot across the throat of some crapweasel dem. Why? What's up?
30 posted on
05/18/2005 7:19:30 AM PDT by
Tacis
( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
To: areafiftyone; Congressman Billybob
This is NewsMax. I have been suckered before by believing their articles. I want to see this from another source, preferably more than one.
John, I have pinged you to this thread to ask if the prosecutor has committed some act that would make this a mistrial or if he can somehow be sanctioned for this egregious refusal to present clear evidence, IF this article is accurate.
I will be away from the computer most of the day and will check back this evening.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson