Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativecorner

No, the 30 hours was an example on my part. The 100 that you mentioned is probably correct. Now, help me: how do 100 hours translate into days? Nine to ten days on my count. Anyway, if Frist allows 100 hours, the dems can't say they weren't given ample time for debate.


92 posted on 05/18/2005 6:25:13 AM PDT by katieanna (My Redeemer Liveth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: katieanna

Mitch on Tony's show. Says at least five Dems believe all these Judges deserve an up or down vote, that includes future nominees. He must be talking of the red state Dems.


99 posted on 05/18/2005 6:27:37 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna
Frist is trying to allow the minority it's right to "advise and consent" with the 100 hours before the voting on the nominees that is required by the Constitution. The demoncrats have painted themselves into a corner on this, and it's will come back to bite them in their arses.
169 posted on 05/18/2005 6:42:12 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: katieanna

Reid rejected the 100hrs deal. Frist will not unilaterally give that now.


243 posted on 05/18/2005 6:51:37 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson