Skip to comments.
LIVE SENATE THREAD: "Nuclear Wednesday" for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
C-span 2 ^
| May 18, 2005
Posted on 05/18/2005 5:48:45 AM PDT by ken5050
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 3,041-3,046 next last
To: Howlin
621
posted on
05/18/2005 7:49:06 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
To: All
To sum up Spectre's argument-
The filibuster is a consequence of politics, and retaliation that built over decades. It is dangerous to our Republic.
He still wants a compromise, preferably one that codifies the definition of extreme etc...
He wants an up and down vote on all nominees.
Why is everyone getting worked up about Spectre? Settle down. Spectre is being Spectre but I've seen nothing yet to state he isn't voting with us.
To: Ron in Acreage
EXCELLENT point. Good job digging that up!
623
posted on
05/18/2005 7:49:42 AM PDT
by
snowrip
("Going to war without the French is like going hunting without your lawnmower.")
To: Howlin
Specter is pointing out the cynicism of saying we dems will take some of these extreme, unacceptable nominees but not others.
624
posted on
05/18/2005 7:49:52 AM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Something wicked this way comes)
To: Soul Seeker
625
posted on
05/18/2005 7:50:04 AM PDT
by
Nucluside
(Rice-Coulter '08)
To: Soul Seeker
All he's doing is proving that it's the Democrats who won't compromise.
626
posted on
05/18/2005 7:50:16 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
To: Howlin
I think he is trying to save it for SCOTUS
To: shellshocked
No need to apologize, I've been FRustrated with FRist for a long time myself. I like him and think he's a good guy, but come ON.
628
posted on
05/18/2005 7:50:21 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(Theodore: the GOOD Roosevelt)
To: ken5050
I don't agree. Party loyalty is why you have parties to begin with. If Spector wants to go Independent, let him run for office that way. If he got Republican votes, he should support his party, or get the @#$% out.
629
posted on
05/18/2005 7:50:23 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
Spectre votes with us than Santorum's argument that Spectre was needed to win this fight will have proven to be true. Santorum should be strongly supported for re-election in that instance.
To: Soul Seeker
It depends from which side you're listening to Spectre. He's dancing down the middle of the road so far IMHO.
631
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:29 AM PDT
by
LisaFab
To: Soul Seeker
Oh dear... Specter said noo-ku-lar
632
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:44 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(Theodore: the GOOD Roosevelt)
To: Howlin
Yeegads! Black Sabbath for bumper music on Tony Snow?! LOL!!
633
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:47 AM PDT
by
Ladysmith
((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
To: ken5050
Will Traitor
Reid continue to be nasty?Does the sun rise in the East ?
To: Soul Seeker
Specter is adopting the newest democrat strategy.
They have offered to vote on "less controversial" (read less conservative)
nominees OTHER THAN Owen and Brown.
635
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:50 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: ken5050
Blah...blah...blah Specter. You are supposed to be a Republican you POS! If our members did as the demoncrats do, this horse shit would of been over right after the election. I smell some "Daschles" coming in the next election.
To: MamaLucci
Is Specter calling for less extreme nominees to be voted on first..........Leslie Marshall, a demoncrat talking head that was just on FOX, said our choice of judges was radical and extreme, but she slipped and publicly refereed to them as (eeeevil) "Christians."
In other words, righteousness and a moral foundation should not be allowed on the bench. Only whores, homos, racist, thieves, baby murderers,.....the list goes on and on....are allowed to "make laws."
To: Soul Seeker
If you think Spector will vote with us, then you should be reading up on Scottish law.
638
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:55 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: EQAndyBuzz
639
posted on
05/18/2005 7:51:57 AM PDT
by
MattMa
(I'm not a victim, I am a conservative and if you get to close, I just may bite.)
To: Pukin Dog
He sure wanted to play with "the party" when he needed help back in October. And again in January when he wanted this committee.
640
posted on
05/18/2005 7:52:05 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 3,041-3,046 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson