Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Defies Bush, Approves Highway Bill
AP ^ | 5/17/2005 | JIM ABRAMS,

Posted on 05/17/2005 12:36:07 PM PDT by katieanna

WASHINGTON - The Republican-controlled Senate brushed aside a presidential veto threat Tuesday and passed a $295 billion highway bill, arguing that massive spending on bigger and better roads was necessary to fight congestion and unsafe roadways.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush43; transportation; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2005 12:36:08 PM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Good. Maybe President Bush will finally use the veto.


2 posted on 05/17/2005 12:41:18 PM PDT by mattdono ("Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags" -Big Arnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

"Maybe President Bush will finally use the veto."


Not holding my breath. The man LOVES increased gov't spending.

(I hope he does, though)


3 posted on 05/17/2005 12:41:58 PM PDT by Blzbba (Let them hate us as long as they fear us - Caligula)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Those of us in the heavy/highway construction industry are cheering. I think this and defense are about the only ways our government should be spending money.


4 posted on 05/17/2005 12:41:59 PM PDT by ctlpdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

I forget, which party was the "smaller, more fiscally responsible" party again? I wonder if Bush has finally found that Veto stamp that Rove hid from him.


5 posted on 05/17/2005 12:42:03 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

Doesn't possess the testicles for it and expect his base to go for the nuke option.


6 posted on 05/17/2005 12:42:09 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad
Those of us in the heavy/highway construction industry are cheering. I think this and defense are about the only ways our government should be spending money

I've been watching construction crews working on a bridge in Massachusetts for over 10 years - now that's what I call a quagmire!

7 posted on 05/17/2005 12:43:11 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad

See Big Dig in Massachusetts.....


8 posted on 05/17/2005 12:43:21 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad

"Those of us in the heavy/highway construction industry are cheering. I think this and defense are about the only ways our government should be spending money."


That may be, but all the pork and additional spending should be stripped out of the bill.


9 posted on 05/17/2005 12:43:47 PM PDT by golfboy (character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

"Good. Maybe President Bush will finally use the veto."

Don't hold your breath - The veto is not known to Bush. In all truth, I can't remember a single time that he has used the veto since he has been President. I would appreciate any of you offering up any examples of when he has, in fact, used his veto power.


10 posted on 05/17/2005 12:44:02 PM PDT by lnbchip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
In addition to granting money to states to repair and build roads and bridges, the bill provides more than $50 billion for public transit, funds recreational road programs and promotes highway safety.

I think we are worth it after just giving $82 billion more to Iraq. President Bush seems to favor the welfare of other countries over ours. Fine, let's see if he vetoes it. Maybe Amtrak will finally tank. Too bad, I love train travel.

11 posted on 05/17/2005 12:44:13 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Truth is a rare commodity. Seek it, know it and cherish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
It has to be reconciled with the House version, which I believe is more in line with the President's wishes. Not over yet.
12 posted on 05/17/2005 12:44:26 PM PDT by IrishGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

See it, did it. Spent a bunch of my life working on it, and damn proud of it! Bechtel/Parsons Brinkerhoff/QAQuade/Douglas are the idiots to blame, as are the foolish ignorant media.


13 posted on 05/17/2005 12:45:49 PM PDT by ctlpdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ctlpdad
Those of us in the heavy/highway construction industry are cheering.

Those of us in the tax paying industry are crying.

50 billion of the 295 billion is "going for public transit, fund recreational road programs and promote highway safety." Okay, what exactly are recreational road programs?

14 posted on 05/17/2005 12:45:53 PM PDT by Cagey (These pretzels are making me thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Waht town, and what road?


15 posted on 05/17/2005 12:46:17 PM PDT by ctlpdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
Good. Maybe President Bush will finally use the veto.

Expecting Bush to restrain the big spending tendencies of congress is like expecting some of Paris Hilton’s wisdom to rub off on Nichole Ritchie.

16 posted on 05/17/2005 12:46:44 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

I see it every day, thanks. I've seen enough.


17 posted on 05/17/2005 12:47:39 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Sorry, I don't consider millions of dollars for bike trails to be a priority. He should stick with his threat and veto the bill, while highlighting all the pork projects.


18 posted on 05/17/2005 12:48:01 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: golfboy

I agree the pork and tack-ons really suck. Has any bill been passed in the last 5 score without it?


19 posted on 05/17/2005 12:48:58 PM PDT by ctlpdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Okay, what exactly are recreational road programs?

Bike trails.

20 posted on 05/17/2005 12:49:10 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson