Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Identifying ammunition
The Record ^ | May 16, 2005 | Karina Ioffee

Posted on 05/16/2005 9:51:58 PM PDT by calcowgirl

STOCKTON - Could a number help police solve crimes and deter criminals?

Several weeks ago, Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Garden Grove, unveiled a bill proposing the serialization of all ammunition sold in California starting in July 2007.

The legislation, supported by California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland, is being hailed by supporters as a cost-effective way to prevent crimes and help law enforcement do its job. Opponents say the bill is rife with problems and will only increase costs to consumers and ammunition manufacturers.

The proposal would require vendors to sell ammunition with an identification number zapped on the bullet and casing, and buyers would have to register their purchase with the Office of the Attorney General. The intent is to aid police with investigations into gun crimes by tracing the number €" etched with a laser " to the buyer.

"This would help law enforcement identify and convict violent criminals and murderers by bringing DNA-type technology to the identifying of ammunition," said Jim Stevens, spokesman for Dunn.

Almost 2,400 people were murdered in California in 2003, and two-thirds of them were with guns, according to Griffin Dix, president of the California chapter of the Million Mom March, a national survivors-rights organization. But 45 percent of those cases are unsolved, according to Department of Justice statistics. In San Joaquin County, about 36 percent of homicide cases weren't solved in 2003.

The reason is that there often "isn't enough evidence to go on," said Dix, who lost his 15-year-old son to an unintentional shooting 11 years ago. "We think the bill would work to prevent gun violence and have a preventive effect by putting criminals in jail and keeping them there."

Stockton police said they weren't familiar with the bill, which will go to the Senate floor within a month. But some expressed doubt that a bullet identification system would be effective because many seasoned criminals pick up shell casings after a shooting to avoid leaving evidence.

"Any reasonable effort is appreciated, but it wouldn't take long before criminals figured out how to circumvent it," Stockton Police Chief Mark Herder said.

That's the same doubt the gun lobby has expressed, arguing that the bill, known as SB357, would strengthen the already burgeoning black market for guns.

"The notion that criminals will walk into a store and put down their identification and give their name is laughable," said Lawrence Keane, general counsel for the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute.

About 80 percent of crimes in the United States are committed with guns acquired through family or friends, stolen or bought on the black market, Keane said.

Prices also would be affected because serialization of the 8 billion cartridges that are produced each year would take significantly longer, Keane said.

"It (serialization) would take approximately three weeks to do what is now done in one day," he said, adding that the cartridges would take more time to produce, causing the price to jump to several dollars per cartridge.

Proponents say a half cent would be added to the cost of each bullet.

It also would cost about $50 for a shop owner to enter everyone who purchases ammunition into a Department of Justice database.

The measure has been publicly supported by numerous law enforcement officials, including Sacramento County Sheriff Lou Blanas and Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca.

There are hurdles along the way €" from the appropriations committee, where the bill is now, to the Senate floor, where supporters hope it arrives in a month.

Dix says he hopes California's track record of being the first state to ban Saturday night specials, short-barreled guns lacking safety features and assault weapons will bolster the bill's chance of success.

"We are not interested in taking people's guns away but in closing down the illegal gun market," Dix said. "It's much too easy for someone to get a gun."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ammunition; banglist; bloat; california; fkba; joedunn; sb357
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2005 9:51:59 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Almost 2,400 people were murdered in California in 2003, and two-thirds of them were with guns, according to Griffin Dix, president of the California chapter of the Million Mom March, a national survivors-rights organization. But 45 percent of those cases are unsolved, according to Department of Justice statistics. In San Joaquin County, about 36 percent of homicide cases weren't solved in 2003.

---

Gee, if the state was able to execute most of those on death row, many of whom used guns in the commissions of their crimes, maybe a deterrent effect would reduce numbers like the 2003 total.

Nyahhh. what was I thinking? The c'Rats want it both ways , always have, always will, to not be held accountable for coddling criminals but only too happy to make life hell for those left behind, in the name of the greater good.

2 posted on 05/16/2005 9:56:18 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
http://www.saami.org/news/CA_ammoSer040505.htm

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1397471/posts

I for one hope those idiots pass that legislation with no exemption for military or LE. It'd be great to see ammunition manufacturers completely pull out of KA and force the police minions of that socialist cesspool have to sneak into Nevada to buy unmarked ammo because everything else is either too expensive or unavailable in KA.
3 posted on 05/16/2005 10:00:03 PM PDT by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If they executed them how would they get their vote in future elections?


4 posted on 05/16/2005 10:01:28 PM PDT by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This guy Joe Dunn is out of control. I hadn't seen him much before, but this is the third time he cropped up this week (reparations for Mexican deportations and Nixing the Constit'l Amendment defining marriage--click keyword above for articles). He needs to be replaced.... ASAP! LOL.


5 posted on 05/16/2005 10:02:22 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

If all ammo had to be serial numbered, ammo prices would skyrocket while availability would plummet - just what gun grabbers dream of.


6 posted on 05/16/2005 10:09:49 PM PDT by GladesGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: hellbilly

From what I understand of the bill, it will be illegal to possess ammunition that isn't serialized. I have no doubt that the senate will pass this travesty. Perhaps Arnold will veto it.


8 posted on 05/16/2005 10:18:20 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I live in California. I buy all my ammunition from out of state via the Internet.


9 posted on 05/16/2005 10:20:14 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Recall Barbara Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Several weeks ago, Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Garden Grove, unveiled a bill proposing the serialization of all ammunition sold in California starting in July 2007.

The proposal would require vendors to sell ammunition with an identification number zapped on the bullet and casing, and buyers would have to register their purchase with the Office of the Attorney General.

What a kick azz idea! I bet if they put numbers on guns the firearm related crime would vanish... right?

< /idt >

10 posted on 05/16/2005 10:27:50 PM PDT by TLI (. ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA,. .Minuteman Project, Day -1 to Day 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

No it won't.

The entreprenure in me will crank up his reloading press and ship ammo into CA from my website... and CA can suck wind.

This will only effect businesses that are stupid enough to still be located in the Peoples Republic.


11 posted on 05/16/2005 10:31:02 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLI

I think any legislator sponsoring stupid gun control schemes should have the bill number permanently tattoo'd to their forehead. So when they cross the line we'll know who to shoot first.

Aren't serial numbers and registration great?


12 posted on 05/16/2005 10:33:21 PM PDT by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: .38sw

perhaps Arnold will veto it..

being part of the kennedy clan which has been the target of firearms more than once, somehow , I am not so sure.


13 posted on 05/16/2005 10:33:44 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

He did veto the bullet tax last year ( .10 per round), which was helpful, but he signed the .50BMG ban, so ya never know.


14 posted on 05/16/2005 10:34:58 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

Just like cigarettes?
And were seeing how much of a unknown person you are and well that works. Guess what Internet purchases are the next target?


15 posted on 05/16/2005 10:36:19 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .38sw

let's hope he has a new shipment of veto pens and cigars ready to go, the sheer number of bills that will be crossing his desk this year will be ginormous.


16 posted on 05/16/2005 10:38:33 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
I live in California. I buy all my ammunition from out of state via the Internet

The cost of those shipments will increase dramatically or those shipments will halt immediately if this bill passes. Manufacturers may not be willing to incur the cost to comply with this bill and if they do, they will pass it on to the users. The bill is nothing but a thinly veiled attempt by the grabbers to eliminate ammunition coming into the state.

17 posted on 05/16/2005 10:50:16 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Prices also would be affected because serialization of the 8 billion cartridges that are produced each year...

8 billion? That would require, mmmmmm, ten digits. Plus two for the year, I suppose. Maybe one more, to allow for production to reach ten billion.

Thirteen unique id digits. That gonna fit on a .22 short...???

18 posted on 05/16/2005 11:01:32 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Too many people are not only willing to live in a police state but actually WANT to love in a police state.


19 posted on 05/16/2005 11:15:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
That gonna fit on a .22 short...???

Uh, no. That's why they will require all ammunition produced to be .50 BMG... just think of the brilliance... the serial number will fit... and the serial number will never get disfigured by firing because all .50BMG firearms are illegal!

20 posted on 05/16/2005 11:45:49 PM PDT by Swordmaker (tagline now open, please ring bell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson