Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants Retraction From Newsweek
AP ^ | May 16, 2005 | DINO HAZELL

Posted on 05/16/2005 10:19:56 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

In an apology to readers this week, Newsweek acknowledged errors in a story alleging U.S. interrogators at Guantanamo Bay desecrated the Quran. The accusations, which the magazine vowed to re-examine, spawned protests in Afghanistan that left 15 dead and scores injured.

Responding to harsh criticism from Muslim leaders worldwide, the Pentagon promised to investigate the charges and pinned the deadly clashes on Newsweek for what it described as "irresponsible" reporting.

"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst," Editor Mark Whitaker wrote in the apology.

The White House said Monday that Newsweek's response was insufficient.

"It's puzzling. While Newsweek now acknowledges that they got the facts wrong, they refuse to retract the story," said presidential spokesman Scott McClellan. "I think there's a certain journalistic standard that should be met. In this instance it was not.

"This was a report based on a single anonymous source that could not substantiate the allegation that was made," McClellan added. "The report has had serious consequences. People have lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged. I just find it puzzling."

In its issue dated May 9, Newsweek had reported that U.S. military investigators had found evidence that interrogators placed copies of Islam's holy book in washrooms and had flushed one down the toilet to get inmates to talk.

Whitaker wrote that the magazine's information came from "a knowledgeable U.S. government source," and writers Michael Isikoff and John Barry had sought comment from two Defense Department officials. One declined to respond, and the other challenged another part of the story but did not dispute the Quran charge, Whitaker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; bush; islam; koran; korandesecration; liberalmedia; muslim; newsweek; retraction; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2005 10:19:57 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I think a retraction of Newsweek is in order.


2 posted on 05/16/2005 10:22:21 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
No retraction, no White House press credentials.

That would be my ultimatum to NewsWEAK.
3 posted on 05/16/2005 10:23:51 AM PDT by Carling (FReemail me if you want articles that interest, well...me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Not only a retraction, BUT A NEWS CONFERENCE!

"Newsweak" lied and good men died!

Semper Fi,
Kelly


4 posted on 05/16/2005 10:24:05 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Who owns Newsweek?


5 posted on 05/16/2005 10:25:26 AM PDT by Dallas59 (" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Is it possible/feasible to sue them as well?


6 posted on 05/16/2005 10:25:36 AM PDT by k2blader ('Lost' ping list - Please FReepmail me if you want on/off. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Are you sure that this story was in Newsweek? I thought I saw it on 60 minutes II. Another Dano special.


7 posted on 05/16/2005 10:25:47 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carling

I really mean a retraction of Newsweek, exterminate them.


8 posted on 05/16/2005 10:25:49 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
???......is it NOT true,.... that it is now legal for the media to lie to the public worldwide?
9 posted on 05/16/2005 10:26:06 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Washington Post


10 posted on 05/16/2005 10:26:10 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Who owns Newsweek?

The Washington Post.

11 posted on 05/16/2005 10:27:10 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Yep - a simple quid pro quo.

It's the price of admission in DC.


12 posted on 05/16/2005 10:27:45 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

This liberal rag is demonstrating the liberal belief that they aren't responsible for the consequences of their actions. Their desire to print negative things about their own country is bad enough. When it's not even true, doesn't this meet the standard for "providing aid and comfort" to our enemies?


13 posted on 05/16/2005 10:27:49 AM PDT by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What they really need to do is for the white house and DOD to revoke all newsweek reporters press credentials and pull any embedded reporters out of the battle zones.

Don't let them back either until they fire those two reporters and formally retract the story.


14 posted on 05/16/2005 10:28:48 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (September 11, 2001, never forget, and never forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous

I think there will be a firing/resignation over this. Plus a retraction. I cannot remember how Newsweek handled the Rather situation but they cannot afford to have a double standard for their own publication.


15 posted on 05/16/2005 10:31:34 AM PDT by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Washington Post owns Newsweek. Heads should roll.


16 posted on 05/16/2005 10:32:13 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Exterminate them all.


17 posted on 05/16/2005 10:32:17 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Send 'em to GiTMO!


18 posted on 05/16/2005 10:34:36 AM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"It's puzzling that while Newsweek now acknowledges that they got the facts wrong, they refused to retract the story," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. "I think there's a certain journalistic standard that should be met and in this instance it was not."

McClellan is asking for what we in the land of political non-correctness like to call "the truth"

19 posted on 05/16/2005 10:35:51 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Why is it that the wackiest people get to define reality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, in a U.S. State Dept.-issued press release on May 12, said the Newsweek story isn't a chief cause of the riots: " [H]e has been told that the Jalalabad, Afghanistan, rioting was related more to the ongoing political reconciliation process in Afghanistan than anything else."

Also, it should be noted that Newsweek's error was in reporting that the U.S. was prepared to admit to the desecration of the Quran. There are myriad sources that the desecration has occurred, and this is not seriously in dispute.


20 posted on 05/16/2005 10:38:53 AM PDT by uberPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson