Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed NJ Law: Seize Homes w/Illegal Guns
World Net Daily ^ | May 10, 2005 | Ron Strom

Posted on 05/15/2005 4:57:55 AM PDT by publiusF27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-325 next last
To: cvq3842

My word, sections of NJ would be totally vacant if they removed illegals.


21 posted on 05/15/2005 6:06:59 AM PDT by Spirited (God, Bless America, ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Manzo and criminals like him in office is what Magna Charta, Lexington and Concord, and the guillotine were all about.

Americans have just become too lazy, ignorant and apathetic to realize it.


22 posted on 05/15/2005 6:07:01 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Hate your neighbor? Toss a gun on his property and call the police

That's what I was thinking, this really opens the door for corruption.

And what is an "illegal" gun, maybe a pistol your grandpa gave you that never was registered, and you lose your entire life's accumulation. It's a stupid, stupid law, I'm sure it won't pass.

23 posted on 05/15/2005 6:07:10 AM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27
Remember the movie, Enemy of the State?

We have enough laws now that we are all potential enemies of the state. Will we be looking back someday with a rallying cry of "Remember the Davidians"?

It is my personal opinion that we are more likely to see the middle east turned into glass than the US is to be brought down by a coalition of oil shieks and camel jockeys. In the mean time, government mandated socialism is destroying the capital base that has been the cornerstone of our ability to defend ourselves and our ability to defend our freedoms. Socialism is nothing more than government mandated involuntary servitude.

I think there is room to broaden the debate regarding who constitutes the greater threat to our freedoms and our liberties? When the fundamental freedom on which all of our personal abilities to defend ourselves against all enemies, foreign and domestic, has the potential to make us all enemies of the state, there is something radically wrong. And if the fact that this has been proposed as law by an elected public official should send chills of fear down the spine of thinking people who value freedom and the values on which this country was founded. This is the type of proposal one would expect from government officials from the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. This man has a total disregard for United States Constitution, particularly the Fifth and Second Amendments. Such proposals are how the rule of law is replaced by the rule of men.

24 posted on 05/15/2005 6:09:02 AM PDT by Reaganghost (Our freedoms will never be safe as long as a single Democrat holds elected public office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack; ohioWfan
NYPD has a sign on the BQE touting the thousands of cars taken from drunk drivers--BEFORE they were convicted! I laugh when I hear someone say we live in "a nation of law". No we don't and gov't knows it and likes it that way.

No lie.

We defeated the Soviet Union.

Then we became them.

25 posted on 05/15/2005 6:10:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Don't sound so shocked. This has been going on for quite some time. I first became interested in the issue when a boat belonging to the father of a friend was confiscated, along with a smaller boat which was in tow, back in the early 1990s.

The owner of the boat is the most friendly, law-abiding person I think I have ever met. He was doing a favor for a Bahamian he had known for many years. The guy asked for a ride across the Gulf Stream to Miami. He had no idea that the guy, upon learning that Customs and Immigration were coming down to see him, would just take off from the dock and disappear.

His boat committed a crime, the clear suspicion was that the Bahamian was carrying drugs. His other boat was in tow at the time. Both were taken and allowed to deteriorate in a holding yard, where he could not maintain them, for months. He fought in court all that time, and finally got them back when those leftist property rights haters over at CBS 60 Minutes got wind of the story.

There were never any charges against my friend. Civil forfeiture, unlike criminal forfeiture, does not require that. The PROPERTY is guilty, not necessarily the person.

But why bother convicting drug dealers when it is soooo much easier to just take their stuff? Or the stuff of anyone who happens to be around...
26 posted on 05/15/2005 6:13:17 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Better yet, toss a gun onto the property of every Democrat politician in NJ, then call the police. Make sure Louis Manzo is the first one.


27 posted on 05/15/2005 6:16:05 AM PDT by Smedley (I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

Why not? They're already grabbing properties left and right in the name of "eminent domain". Properties which just so happen to be part of burgeoning developments (guess who pockets the profits?)


28 posted on 05/15/2005 6:16:28 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

Blame the damn voters who DESPITE all the corruption still yank the democrat lever

Course Whitman wasn't much better


29 posted on 05/15/2005 6:23:41 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl
It's a stupid, stupid law, I'm sure it won't pass.

Does it afford the suspect almost no rights and recourses? Does it profit the government?

It will pass.

30 posted on 05/15/2005 6:26:48 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tahotdog
Yet another reason for not living in NJ.

Indeed. New Jersey is definitely on my list of states to not take a job in or move to. It's a growing list with California in the number one position.

31 posted on 05/15/2005 6:27:08 AM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
At first I thought this said homes with illegal immigrants!

I'm sure they will be exempt from this law if it passes.

32 posted on 05/15/2005 6:28:39 AM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl
It's a stupid, stupid law, I'm sure it won't pass.

...but, Its' New Jersey. :D

33 posted on 05/15/2005 6:35:23 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

I really don’t want to see bloody riots in the streets or another revolution – but how much can The People take?


34 posted on 05/15/2005 6:56:09 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

Looks like NJ will then be the first 100% state gubmint-owned state in the union then!

Thing is, they'll take the property from otherwise law-abiding citizens, and none from the hoodlums who operate freely in Jersey because they're all related.


35 posted on 05/15/2005 7:00:14 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

Looks like NJ will then be the first 100% state gubmint-owned state in the union then!

Thing is, they'll take the property from otherwise law-abiding citizens, and none from the hoodlums who operate freely in Jersey because they're all related.


36 posted on 05/15/2005 7:00:25 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

It shouldn’t surprise me that what has been so successful for the “war” on drugs should be adopted by the war on the 2nd Amendment 4th Amendments to our Federal Constitution. I am shocked that The People allow it to happen.


37 posted on 05/15/2005 7:00:34 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Excellent observation...these demonrats will never get it--even after losing election after election.


38 posted on 05/15/2005 7:05:14 AM PDT by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
It is not so shocking that people allow it to happen, when you consider that we Americans are actually pretty free when compared to most any human who has ever lived. Life is not so bad in our socialist paradise. They probably won't seize your house.

Probably.
39 posted on 05/15/2005 7:43:57 AM PDT by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: publiusF27

Draconian siezure tactics. Government profits considerably from property siezures. Find more ways to take property, take more property. Add firearms to the mix and it becomes acceptable. Thieves!


40 posted on 05/15/2005 8:03:06 AM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-325 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson