Skip to comments.
Officials Weighed Shooting at Errant Plane
AP (via Drudge) ^
| May 12, 2005 9:33 PM (ET)
| LARA JAKES JORDAN
Posted on 05/13/2005 12:25:41 AM PDT by andie74
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
And who does it land on??
To: andie74
all members of Congress should be required to wear running shoes to work .....
high heels , give me a break.
22
posted on
05/13/2005 1:26:02 AM PDT
by
injin
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
Three radio warnings, then *maybe* a flyby by a jet to see what's going on (if there's time). If no flyby, just light up his world. "Sorry about your luck, buddy."
23
posted on
05/13/2005 1:27:59 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: andie74
And something else that I thought of today. Could the Cessna have been a diversion to something else that was being planned on the ground?That or a dry run to probe our response.
24
posted on
05/13/2005 1:29:52 AM PDT
by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: andie74
A serious problem is if you shoot the airplane out of the sky, you will have a flaming wreckage falling into the Wash. D.C. metro area. There is a very good chance of killing people on the ground. It could fall onto a house, cars in traffic, people walking on a sidewalk etc.
Of course, the American royalty ruling over us doesn't care about the little folks who must die to protect royalty but it makes for some very ugly public relations.
The little people might correctly conclude they are all expendable to protect the elites of Washington D.C.
To: injin
It was the Nancy Pelosi comparison to Cinderella that nauseated me.
26
posted on
05/13/2005 1:33:56 AM PDT
by
andie74
(Socializing children at home since 2003)
To: Fenris6
IMO part of the decisionmaking on this would be the damage and injury caused by falling Cessna debris. Three miles radius from the WH is densely populated urban and semi-urban territory.
27
posted on
05/13/2005 1:34:23 AM PDT
by
angkor
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
As opposed to someone detonating a nuke in an airplane over DC and wiping out things like the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and other items of historic significance to all mankind? Sorry, but I'm willing to take that chance, and I'm not this "royalty" of which you speak.
Not shooting the thing down could mean that A NUCLEAR DETONATION AND RESULTING SHOCKWAVE hits them. Chance killing a few to save the many? Any time.
28
posted on
05/13/2005 1:35:02 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: quietolong
quietolong wrote:
And who does it land on??
--> Maybe a trampoline or some electric lines? :)
29
posted on
05/13/2005 1:45:55 AM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45; quietolong
30
posted on
05/13/2005 1:55:36 AM PDT
by
andie74
(Socializing children at home since 2003)
To: ARCADIA
If and when the terrorists decide on such an adventure, it will not be with a C-150. This affair has shown that anyone with the right equipment can penetrate nearly at will.
31
posted on
05/13/2005 2:08:11 AM PDT
by
cynicom
(<p)
To: Spktyr
....as opposed to someone detonating a nuke in an airplane over DC..LOL! Yeah, the ol' nuke in the Cessna 150 trick, we missed it by THAT much. Hey Spktyr, take a break from the Tom Clancy novels. Maybe ten minutes breathing into a paper bag might help?
32
posted on
05/13/2005 2:13:18 AM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: konaice
You fly under or over the plane without the afterburners on. Once you overtake the plane you drop down or rise up in front of the small plane and hit the afterburners. The pilot of the small plane wouldn't know what hit him.
33
posted on
05/13/2005 2:15:36 AM PDT
by
skimask
(I only fly on planes with two right wings)
To: skimask
Sigh... See my #6 above...
34
posted on
05/13/2005 2:20:07 AM PDT
by
konaice
To: andie74
It was two pilots, one was a student and the other was a person who trains pilots.
FAA said nothing was going to happen to either pilot.
They could rent an other plane and do the same thing again.
The student should get his learners permit burned and the instructor should have his pilot license removed.
35
posted on
05/13/2005 2:22:55 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
To: skimask
The pilot of the small plane wouldn't know what hit him.
Neither would the fighter pilot when he discovers that following orders doesn't cut it when you drop a 17 year old student pilot on a day care center.
Perhaps a better way would be to set up a 100 mile IFR only flight zone around DC.
36
posted on
05/13/2005 2:26:35 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Ummm...forgive me, but weren't the 9/11 hijackers trained in US flight schools? Doncha think we oughta check them out?
37
posted on
05/13/2005 2:28:21 AM PDT
by
andie74
(Socializing children at home since 2003)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
The student should get his learners permit burned and the instructor should have his pilot license removed.
The student should be allowed to make mistakes, his instructor is responsible for his performance. But, before we run off on a witch hunt, lets get the facts. For all we know there may have been an equipment failure, or faulty air traffic vector.
38
posted on
05/13/2005 2:31:53 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: andie74
Like...where is this pilot? Being interviewed by our good friends in Uzbekistan?
39
posted on
05/13/2005 2:35:00 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
To: andie74
I don't understand your point and yes I knew about the flight schools training the terrorists.
I personally don't think this was just a dumb mistake.
40
posted on
05/13/2005 2:40:03 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson