Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials Weighed Shooting at Errant Plane
AP (via Drudge) ^ | May 12, 2005 9:33 PM (ET) | LARA JAKES JORDAN

Posted on 05/13/2005 12:25:41 AM PDT by andie74

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: 1FASTGLOCK45

And who does it land on??


21 posted on 05/13/2005 1:25:57 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andie74

all members of Congress should be required to wear running shoes to work .....
high heels , give me a break.


22 posted on 05/13/2005 1:26:02 AM PDT by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1FASTGLOCK45

Three radio warnings, then *maybe* a flyby by a jet to see what's going on (if there's time). If no flyby, just light up his world. "Sorry about your luck, buddy."


23 posted on 05/13/2005 1:27:59 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andie74
And something else that I thought of today. Could the Cessna have been a diversion to something else that was being planned on the ground?

That or a dry run to probe our response.

24 posted on 05/13/2005 1:29:52 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: andie74
A serious problem is if you shoot the airplane out of the sky, you will have a flaming wreckage falling into the Wash. D.C. metro area. There is a very good chance of killing people on the ground. It could fall onto a house, cars in traffic, people walking on a sidewalk etc.

Of course, the American royalty ruling over us doesn't care about the little folks who must die to protect royalty but it makes for some very ugly public relations.

The little people might correctly conclude they are all expendable to protect the elites of Washington D.C.

25 posted on 05/13/2005 1:30:58 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: injin

It was the Nancy Pelosi comparison to Cinderella that nauseated me.


26 posted on 05/13/2005 1:33:56 AM PDT by andie74 (Socializing children at home since 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

IMO part of the decisionmaking on this would be the damage and injury caused by falling Cessna debris. Three miles radius from the WH is densely populated urban and semi-urban territory.


27 posted on 05/13/2005 1:34:23 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

As opposed to someone detonating a nuke in an airplane over DC and wiping out things like the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and other items of historic significance to all mankind? Sorry, but I'm willing to take that chance, and I'm not this "royalty" of which you speak.

Not shooting the thing down could mean that A NUCLEAR DETONATION AND RESULTING SHOCKWAVE hits them. Chance killing a few to save the many? Any time.


28 posted on 05/13/2005 1:35:02 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: quietolong

quietolong wrote:
And who does it land on??

--> Maybe a trampoline or some electric lines? :)


29 posted on 05/13/2005 1:45:55 AM PDT by 1FASTGLOCK45 (FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 1FASTGLOCK45; quietolong

Or a canopy?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1401804/posts

OK, I am getting loopy. G'nite or good morning, whichever you prefer!


30 posted on 05/13/2005 1:55:36 AM PDT by andie74 (Socializing children at home since 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
If and when the terrorists decide on such an adventure, it will not be with a C-150. This affair has shown that anyone with the right equipment can penetrate nearly at will.
31 posted on 05/13/2005 2:08:11 AM PDT by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
....as opposed to someone detonating a nuke in an airplane over DC..

LOL! Yeah, the ol' nuke in the Cessna 150 trick, we missed it by THAT much. Hey Spktyr, take a break from the Tom Clancy novels. Maybe ten minutes breathing into a paper bag might help?

32 posted on 05/13/2005 2:13:18 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: konaice
You fly under or over the plane without the afterburners on. Once you overtake the plane you drop down or rise up in front of the small plane and hit the afterburners. The pilot of the small plane wouldn't know what hit him.
33 posted on 05/13/2005 2:15:36 AM PDT by skimask (I only fly on planes with two right wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skimask

Sigh... See my #6 above...


34 posted on 05/13/2005 2:20:07 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: andie74
It was two pilots, one was a student and the other was a person who trains pilots.
FAA said nothing was going to happen to either pilot.
They could rent an other plane and do the same thing again.
The student should get his learners permit burned and the instructor should have his pilot license removed.
35 posted on 05/13/2005 2:22:55 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimask
The pilot of the small plane wouldn't know what hit him.

Neither would the fighter pilot when he discovers that following orders doesn't cut it when you drop a 17 year old student pilot on a day care center.

Perhaps a better way would be to set up a 100 mile IFR only flight zone around DC.
36 posted on 05/13/2005 2:26:35 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Ummm...forgive me, but weren't the 9/11 hijackers trained in US flight schools? Doncha think we oughta check them out?


37 posted on 05/13/2005 2:28:21 AM PDT by andie74 (Socializing children at home since 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
The student should get his learners permit burned and the instructor should have his pilot license removed.

The student should be allowed to make mistakes, his instructor is responsible for his performance. But, before we run off on a witch hunt, lets get the facts. For all we know there may have been an equipment failure, or faulty air traffic vector.
38 posted on 05/13/2005 2:31:53 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: andie74
Like...where is this pilot?

Being interviewed by our good friends in Uzbekistan?

39 posted on 05/13/2005 2:35:00 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: andie74
I don't understand your point and yes I knew about the flight schools training the terrorists.
I personally don't think this was just a dumb mistake.
40 posted on 05/13/2005 2:40:03 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson