Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California bill would require parents to OK child's body piercing
Sacramento Bee ^ | 5/12/05 | Jim Sanders

Posted on 05/12/2005 3:36:30 PM PDT by Crackingham

State law requires children to get their parents' permission to obtain an aspirin at school, but not to get a two-inch, 12-gauge needle run through their tongue at a piercing shop. Assemblywoman Sharon Runner claims the lack of regulation over piercing is ludicrous, and that California has a vested interest in protecting minors from putting holes in themselves.

"I think parents need to know exactly what their children are doing when it's something that might affect their health and welfare for the rest of their lives," the Lancaster Republican said.

Runner has proposed legislation, Assembly Bill 646, that would ban the piercing of minors' lips, noses, eyebrows, tongues, navels - anything but earlobes - without a parent being present or submitting notarized consent. Violators would be subject to fines up to $250.

Runner's proposal basically would reinstate a law that expired Jan. 1. When the old parental consent law passed the Legislature in 1997, lawmakers asked that it be given an expiration date to ensure re-evaluation of the policy.

Piercing provides a way to attach jewelry to various parts of the body. Shops currently decide for themselves whether to set a minimum age limit.

AB 646 recently cleared its first legislative hurdle, the Assembly Public Safety Committee, by a vote of 5-1. Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, cast the only negative vote.

"I don't think it's a health issue; it's a lifestyle issue," Goldberg said. "Kids are going to do things to show their independence from their parents. I just don't think we should go down that road."

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bodypiercing; parentalconsent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2005 3:36:30 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
State law requires children to get their parents' permission to obtain an aspirin at school, but not to get a two-inch, 12-gauge needle run through their tongue at a piercing shop. Assemblywoman Sharon Runner claims the lack of regulation over piercing is ludicrous, and that California has a vested interest in protecting minors from putting holes in themselves.

I wonder how she feels about requiring parental notification before an underage girl has a vacuum hose shoved up into her uterus.

2 posted on 05/12/2005 3:38:52 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
AB 646 recently cleared its first legislative hurdle, the Assembly Public Safety Committee, by a vote of 5-1. Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, cast the only negative vote.

"I don't think it's a health issue; it's a lifestyle issue," Goldberg said. "Kids are going to do things to show their independence from their parents. I just don't think we should go down that road."


3 posted on 05/12/2005 3:39:21 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Please forgive my rather crude description of an abortion procedure.


4 posted on 05/12/2005 3:39:44 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Truth is truth.


5 posted on 05/12/2005 3:41:02 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I didn't want to register to read the entire article.

Just out of curiosity, what is the California law regarding "parental consent" wrt underage abortions?


6 posted on 05/12/2005 3:42:22 PM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Crude?

Tell it like it is.


7 posted on 05/12/2005 3:44:34 PM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wingman1

No consent required. However, there is a ballot initiative in the work to change that.


8 posted on 05/12/2005 3:46:05 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Never understood how persons under 18 could legally get nipple and genital piercings. It requires an adult (the only ones who can be licensed to perform piercings) to hold sexual body parts to modify them for the purpose of sexual stimulation.

Why isn't this a crime? Underage kids cannot legally consent to sex with an adult, no matter how much they beg.

And such piercings are done on minors.


9 posted on 05/12/2005 3:49:08 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

"No consent required. "

I figured as much.

Any idea how the ballot initiative will play out?


10 posted on 05/12/2005 3:50:03 PM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wingman1
Any idea how the ballot initiative will play out?

It should pass by an overwhelming margin.

11 posted on 05/12/2005 3:51:02 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Piercing provides a way to attach jewelry to various parts of the body.

In other news, tires provide a way for vehicles to move along the street.

12 posted on 05/12/2005 3:51:47 PM PDT by Luna (Lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade at Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

"It should pass by an overwhelming margin."

Good. Thanks for your responses.


13 posted on 05/12/2005 3:52:45 PM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wingman1

Of course, that's not to say it won't be overturned by a leftist Judge.


14 posted on 05/12/2005 3:53:43 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

"Of course, that's not to say it won't be overturned by a leftist Judge."

True. But then the case is made even clearer how people are no longer in control of this country. I have faith that "a hard rain is going to fall" very soon.


15 posted on 05/12/2005 3:56:39 PM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Pierce v. Society of Sisters – The Court held that due process required legislatures to establish to the satisfaction of an independent tribunal that its restrictions on liberty or necessary and proper. “The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.”
16 posted on 05/12/2005 4:05:52 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Maybe this is her mother.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

17 posted on 05/12/2005 4:23:10 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress

That's the geek that holds up the line every time I am trying to pass through the metal detector at the airport.


18 posted on 05/12/2005 4:26:31 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: weegee; All

I never understood how ANY PERSON regardless of age could want to pierce their nipples or genitalia.


19 posted on 05/12/2005 6:00:26 PM PDT by olde north church (Priority: MESSAGE, then messenger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: olde north church

A bit of a "notice me" call for attention and a bit of masochism...

It is entirely an elective fetish. Much like homosexuality and cross-dressing.


20 posted on 05/12/2005 9:01:13 PM PDT by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson