Posted on 05/12/2005 9:34:27 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
My argument exactly. Every time I argue with some sort of vegetarian I always smile, tap my sharp canines and incisors and tell them that those teeth are for ripping and tearing flesh. The back teeth that are flat and leveraged more closely to the mouths' fulcrum and muscles are for crushing and chewing fibrous matter.
Since they are usually lefties, I don't bring G_d into the discussion. However, I almost always point out that evolution separated the meat eaters from the plant only eaters. Homo erectus won that battle for survival due to adaptability to their food gathering environment. The Neanderthals (with their flat cow-like teeth) didn't make it. The second evolutionary argument is to ask them why our gizzard (appendix) is inert. Due to the fact that we cannot digest cellulose, a plant only diet is ridiculous. Plus, there is a very good reason that animal fat tastes sooooooo good.
That said I've only on rare occasions seen a healthy looking or acting vegetarian.
That was me last year - a nasty hard freeze after the tree had flowered. Perfect weather this year, just no bees. Two years in a row w/o home grown peaches... I'm very sad.
No problemo. </john connor>
You can't really bring God into a discussion with a vegan because in the garden of Eden, Adam and Eve didn't eat meat.
My wife is 5'5". When I first met her she was 105 and looked HOT. She still does!
Oddly enough, the only time it seems that vegans care about the Bible is when discussing Genesis. Otherwise, they use esoteric texts like Essene Book of Peace.
Well, in Ohio a good peach crop 3 of every 5 years is doing well.
{{{Hugs}}} sweetie.
hippies suck
Thank Ya.
Many vegans are as skinny as a stick. That is definitely not a healthy way to be.
Sure it is.Just ask anyone who has or knows someone with PKU.We DO NOT need meat(although I love it dearly).Two of my children are phynelketonuric.That means their bodies cannot break down the amino acids in protein.Meat is very high in protein(well except for bacon fat),so they cannot eat any meat.Nor can they eat or drink any dairy product.They even have to watch some of the vegetables because so many contain lots of protein.Potatos and english peas come to mind. (My daughter,11 years old can only have 6 grams of protein per day.Look at some of the nutritional values of some foods when you get a chance.One slice of bread is around 3 grams)
That said,they are extremely healthy.My 11 year old daughter is about 100lbs(she's tall) and my 1.5 year old son is around 25 lbs.They are measured throughtout the year to make sure they are growing as they should be.They're usually growing above the normal percentile.Something else is wrong with this picture.These kids are way under fed or have some type of disorder.It's not the lack of meat or dairy products.
Ruth Chris' steaks are very good but the service sucks.
Me, too. It's about moderation, too. My sister tried vegetarian for a year or 2 with her kids. No one could talk her out of it. She didn't want 'fat' kids. Only skim milk after age 1, no meat. They were pale, thin, anemic and frequently sick. Finally her doctor laid down the law with her, the kids needed meat, and 2% milk till age 2 and regular snacks. Her youngest, a healthy chubby preschooler, clearly benefits from her new way of feeding them.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
---
You don't know what their political ideology is. They homeschool and many homeschoolers are conservative. Some Conservative Christians practice holistic medicine (Amish to some extent). I'm a Vegetarian, but you'll be hard pressed to find anyone more, well I won't say Conservative, cuz Conservatism seems to be dead these days, but you know what i mean....
Veganism is probably unhealthy for children, pregnant mothers etc.. but I don't think vegetarianism is neccesarily unhealthy, although I wouldn't risk it with my wife or kids in that way.
In this case, I am actually leaning towards siding with the family over the state. I'd need more info to be sure though....
See post 232.Your pediatrician is misinformed,as was ours.
I'm siding towards the family as well, only because this isn't the first the CPS has insisted a person's lifestyle is dangerous for children and it turned out NOT to be. There's a family in Florida who had their children taken away based on their diet and then found out the reason why the baby died was because of a genetic defect.
That's the thing about liberals and their experimentation - they'll do it to their kids and rationalize away a 12-pound 3 yo girl as OK, or at least it couldn't be THEIR fault!
I, too, had raw milk as a kid, but I didn't care for it. I, too, have discovered, as was always suspected by my ped and me, that I am lactose intolerant. A local dairy makes a great acidolphus milk I buy occasionally. I love yogurt and can also tolerate certain cheeses, the part-skim, low moisture seem to work best in small amounts. Kefir is good, too, but hard to find where I am. I still love ice cream now and then, but it doesn't love me!
I tolerate it well, it's that I have always been kind of grossed out by it. Maybe because I knew it was a dead animal and looking at the bones and the veins turned me off. And that goes for beef, chicken, and fish. It's funny because I won't eat soy burgers or anything else that pretends to meat. Just really hate the taste and texture, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.